HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 4:08 am
Posts: 3
I'm looking for a set of wheels specifically meant for climbing (doing a few gran fondos and the diabolical double this summer!) and a lightweight set of carbon clinchers seems like a great idea. If money were no object what would you get?

I'm torn between the Lightweight Meilensteins, MadFibers and the Zipp 303s. I imagine the 303's are a little more aero, and I hear they ride really well, but they seem a bit on the heavy side to me. I've felt the difference between a 1498g wheel and a 1080g wheel, and it's night and day different.. so that has me a little worried about the 303's.

Has anyone tried the Lightweight Meilensteins vs the MadFibers?

I'm definitely no rocket scientist, but when I'm cranking up a 17% incline at 4mph, I can't see how having a more aero wheel would be better than less spinning weight. Am I completely off base on that one? So that makes me lean more towards the Lightweights or MadFibers.

Are there other wheels that I should consider?

I know tubulars would ultimately be the way to go, but I just feel more comfortable with the clincher (from a maintenance-on-the-side-of-the-road standpoint, as well as the ease in just carrying an intertube vs a whole nother tire)

Before you flame me, I DID try the search feature, but it returned way too many results which had nothing to do with this specific question, and I gave up after hitting the 23rd (or so) page..

Thanks..


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:01 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:26 am
Posts: 1787
Location: Atlanta, GA, US
Out of your list, I think the Madfiber offer the best value on paper; you are giving up only 70g compared to LW but at a much lower price. One thing about Madfiber is that I don't think you can call them tried and proven yet, but those guys seem to know what they are doing so I imagine the wheels will be good. Plus it seems you can run them tubeless (which to me is a huge plus, since I love how tubeless ride).

_________________
My Bikes

My Photoblog


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:07 am
Posts: 445
Location: San Francisco, CA
so far there is nothing special about my 303s...I certainly haven't seen the firecrest advantage especially in relation to my lightweights. imo go with lightweight or madfiber from that list...

_________________
Thing 1 & Thing 2 & Thing 3


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:43 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1976
Location: NoVA/DC
arent 202 firecrests in the rumor mill?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:31 pm
Posts: 997
Personally I wouldn't go near a set of carbon clinchers for Gran Fondos or Sportives in the European Mountains.

Simply put, unless you are starting at the front and expect to pull away your descending will be governed by lots of other riders who are clueless and will force you to brake far more than you might normally need to. This is especially true of events like the Etape and Marmotte.

In short, get some really decent aluminium rims and save the bling for when you have a clear road.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:55 am
Posts: 457
Well rumor has it the new lightweights hold up to heat better so as far as heavy breaking is concerned that may not be a terrible choice. The firecrest clinchers from zipp also have a pretty good reputation thus far.

I might put in a vote for a good lightweight alu shallow clincher as well like from mavic. Plenty of great climbing wheels in that part of the pie - just not necessarily "deep dish".

_________________
Just ride ..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 381
airwise wrote:
Personally I wouldn't go near a set of carbon clinchers for Gran Fondos or Sportives in the European Mountains.

Simply put, unless you are starting at the front and expect to pull away your descending will be governed by lots of other riders who are clueless and will force you to brake far more than you might normally need to. This is especially true of events like the Etape and Marmotte.

In short, get some really decent aluminium rims and save the bling for when you have a clear road.

:thumbup: What he said. So true. Doing a hilly sportive like Marmotte, Etape, Maratona etc, the last thing you want to deal with is carbon rims. Most of these events are in the high mountains, sometimes it rains, sometimes it starts off dry then pours down 6hrs into a ride. I dont want to be all sketchy descending a mountain with carbon rims in the wet. Besides, you'll spend almost all your time climbing at low speeds, and you can make up more time on the descents if you improve your skills as opposed to running aero wheels.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:29 pm
Posts: 643
Location: UK
To add my tuppence, all of the above is true, and if the carbon clincher wheelset doesn’t weigh less than 1250gms then there’s no real weight advantage vs a good quality handbuilt alu clincher with some weenie hubs (the alu set up would also be at least 50% cheaper).

That said if your heart is set on carbon clinchers and you can afford it the lightweights are basically the most coveted wheels out there, so it's an easy choice.

_________________
"We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities." Oscar Wilde

Pegoretti Responsorium 7580gms
Parlee Z5i 6293gms
Donhou Commuter Lots of gms!
1946 MacLeans Featherweight (L'Eroica!)
1991 Cannondale SM1000


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 10:05 am 
Offline
Formerly known as wassertreter

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:08 am
Posts: 2018
Location: Pedal Square
Someone has to test the Meilensteins for us, go for them :mrgreen:

(Personally I'd still prefer alu clinchers for big mountain rides)

Edit: Why you ask? -- On those popular mountain passes you often get lots of (tourist) traffic, especially when the weather is nice, so chances are you will end up riding your brakes down at 30kph with cars in front and behind you for a significant amount of time. Better safe than ...

_________________
Bikes: Raw Ti, 650b flatbar CX


Last edited by HillRPete on Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 11:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:20 pm
Posts: 1247
Location: New Zealand
What about the Enve Smart 3.4 clinchers?

http://www.enve.com/wheels/road/3.4clincher.aspx

_________________
2012 BMC SLR 6.02kg http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=110390


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 11:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 1:52 pm
Posts: 392
Location: England, UK
If going carbon, I think you should really reconsider Tubs given your priority of weight. There really isn't any much more hassle with them in reality.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 12:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:46 pm
Posts: 89
+ 1 On alu clinchers for and European mountains, forget about carbon clinchers. I personally know of 2 guys who have has their carbon clinchers fail whilst descending Alp d'Huez, luckily managing to actually stop before any disaster happened.

Both went to a bike store closeby afterwards to buy anything to get them rolling again, and the guy there said he has at least 10 or 12 guys EVERY week who come into him after their carbon clinchers fail on the descent, might be even more but they probably went to the hospital first.

Bottom Line : FORGET carbon clinchers for this type of cycling, and probably a good idea to forget about latex tubes on this type of terrain as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:01 am
Posts: 324
Location: Bay State
I had Troy Watson from Fairwheel Bikes build me a set of clincher ZTR 340 Alpha rims with Tune 70/170 24/28 spoke hubs with CX-Rays. Total weight with velo plugs, 1189 grams. Reliable lightweight wheels for mountains, wind and rain.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 3372
Location: Natovi Landing
murph100 wrote:
+ 1 On alu clinchers for and European mountains, forget about carbon clinchers. I personally know of 2 guys who have has their carbon clinchers fail whilst descending Alp d'Huez, luckily managing to actually stop before any disaster happened.

Both went to a bike store closeby afterwards to buy anything to get them rolling again, and the guy there said he has at least 10 or 12 guys EVERY week who come into him after their carbon clinchers fail on the descent, might be even more but they probably went to the hospital first.

Bottom Line : FORGET carbon clinchers for this type of cycling, and probably a good idea to forget about latex tubes on this type of terrain as well.



Interesting!

+ another one for this point of view. As well as being much safer re. heat, tubs will corner better at speed, inspiring more confidence.

Stick with alu clinchers or tubs for the high mountains.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:47 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
Posts: 2394
Location: Mississippi
+1 for aluminum clinchers. I rode my carbon clinchers in a race recently in Tuscaloosa, AL (closest thing we have to mountainous terrain).....after the race a couple guy were like, "Dude, your wheels were smoking!"........of course, I said, "Thanks".......to which they replied, "No, they we literally smoking".

Anyways, if they get that hot with a total of 2000ft of decent, they would absolutely catch on fire in the Alps......

Stan's 340 or XR-200 would build you a very capable wheelset for those types of events that would also give you much less weight in both cases..... :beerchug:

_________________
Cervelo R3

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=125962


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], kauphy, mnmasotto and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Advice/reviews on frames needed.

in Road

Jdrsvin

0

178

Thu Dec 04, 2014 5:23 pm

Jdrsvin View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cannondale Supersix EVO Dura Ace - advice needed

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

MikeC

25

1594

Fri Aug 08, 2014 8:17 pm

PuroScattista View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Di2 6870 front derailleur doesn't stay still - Advice needed

in Road

vtspot

3

345

Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:32 pm

mike View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Geometry advice needed on a prototype Merckx frame

in Road

SWijland

14

1085

Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:44 pm

legs 11 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. DT Swiss RC 55 SPLINE C Carbon Clincher

in Road

TomazK82

2

618

Tue Nov 25, 2014 2:52 pm

Timmy269 View the latest post


It is currently Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:31 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB