Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Sun May 01, 2016 2:04 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken

Those bugs will be fixed ASAP (next few days) as they are unfortunately more serious than expected.

If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062

All times are UTC+01:00

Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:18 pm 

Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 6:01 pm
Posts: 1677
ahumblecycler wrote:
I used a 44/38 this season, and I only used the 44 for flatter, grassier courses. I liked the set up because I still had two options but less chain length (i.e., less chain slap). I used a 12-27 cassette.

Smart man :)

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:44 pm 

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:13 am
Posts: 964
Location: 93306
If I raced cross I would definitely consider doing the 1x10 setup with a 42 and 11/28 8)

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 1:41 pm 

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:32 pm
Posts: 550
Location: Bow of a Farr 40
The problem with 1 ring is how to keep the chain from unshipping and the inevitable thought process. This is how it went for me:

- You can buy all sorts of gizmos to keep a chain on a chainring
- When I looked at them they are rather expensive and specific and limit flexibility (more on that in a second)
- also, when you weigh up the add-ons and doo-dads and compare that with a 103gram Shimano CX70 front mech, it's a wash to me
- eventually I had 3/4 front mechs lying around so you can guess what I settled on for my chain-keeper
- I love my CX bike (Giant TCX - the slightly more racy one with the smooth welds, carbon fork and no eyelets, as opposed to the OEM frame) b/c it's so polyvalent - when I'm not racing I take it touring to France or ride the local MTB trails, so I actually want 2 rings.
- so after racing most of the season on a 1 x 9 with a front mech as chain keeper (not hooked up to the STI, I never cabled it) when it became clear I needed more firepower i.e. a bigger ring it was natural to cable up the front mech and I've never looked back. Having 2 rings is more flexbile depending on the course. I don't live in Denmark or Holland: in some of our races we do almost 400-500 meters of climbing in 1 hour, I can post the Garmin traces. So the 42x12 was not enuf, I can't spin at 120 and my power delivery becomes a less punchy above 100 rpms. And given the weight is not a big deal, it really isn't - Stybar's on a alu frame for pete's sake, as long as you don't make poor shifting choices, then 2 rings are pretty ideal.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:53 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:17 pm
Posts: 33
White Industries VBC cranks are beautifully made, lightweight, still, durable, made by a bunch of nice folks in California, and allow for an almost infinite combination of chainrings. They have an exceptionally low q-factor if you're into that sort of thing. Unless you have an irrational hatred for square taper, they're a great choice, IMO.

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

All times are UTC+01:00

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited