Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Wed Sep 28, 2016 6:15 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062

Unanswered topics | Active topics


» »

All times are UTC+01:00

Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic  Reply to topic  Page 2 of 20
  [ 296 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 20 Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Juanmoretime
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:40 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 11:08 am
Posts: 6784
Location: Urbana, Illinois
Very nice project. Are you going to NAHBS?

_________________
RESIDENT GRUMPY OLD MAN.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
MARLON
 Post subject: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:59 am
Posts: 1227
Oooooooh

Aaaaaaah


For what ???

_________________
BACK IN BLACK
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Weenie
 Post subject: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:22 am 


Top
   
 
gumgardner
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:47 pm
Posts: 3553
Location: Pittsburgh
fallen86 wrote:
Ridiculous weight! Congrats. What bottom bracket shell did you go with and what cranks do you have in mind?


Thank you. :beerchug: It's designed to work with the AX Morpheus. It's basically a bb386.

Valbrona wrote:
gumgardner wrote:
The Ruegamer was meant to be an "über" weenie build, but when the frame came in at 1087g I knew it wasnt going to be what I was looking for.


I admire your keeness to want to build what you call an uber lightweight build. Getting the first thing right would be a start, ie. the frame. Surely a frame with an integrated seatpost is lighter than a traditional frame + seatpost?


Not necessarily... my seatpost and saddle will weigh around 125g when done. Jure Berk is building me a nano carbon combo, using the Tune Speedneedle shape. Here are a few "in production" pics, as the parts were pulled from the moulds:

Image
By gumgardner at 2012-01-18

Image
By gumgardner at 2012-01-18

Image
By gumgardner at 2012-01-18

caseycycling wrote:
Wow almost a full pound difference b/t the Crumpton and the Ruegamer, you have got to be excited. Not that many 8lb bikes floating around out there. Are you going to use parts intended to go on the previously mentioned 18page Ruegamer build for the Crumpton frame? Or are you building the Rue as planned and getting all new uber light parts for the Crumpton?


I kept some of the parts intended for the Rue, but the uber-light parts were saved for the Crumpton. There will also be some tuning with the components on this build, which I didn't do on the Ruegamer.

Juanmoretime wrote:
Very nice project. Are you going to NAHBS?

Unfortunately no. A lot of you guys and girls will likely see it before me. :evil: Be nice to it :wink:

_________________
RUEGAMER 5.21kg, 11.48lbs

CRUMPTON 4.40kg, 9.70lbs
Top
   
Reply with quote  
campbellrae
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:20 am
Posts: 518
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
:popcorn:
Top
   
Reply with quote  
mises
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 9:28 pm
Posts: 1769
Location: Unknown parameter
Damn, I may have to get a job again to keep up. :shock:

You should use a DT shifter for the f der to save some more weight, and none of that porky electronic shifting stuff.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
donald
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:32 pm
Posts: 224
Location: san francisco ca. usa
From the picture it really looks like a great frame from a great builder. I really admire Nick's work. Also a fantastic weight. I was wondering If that weight includes the front and rear derailleur hangers. ......can't wait to see more pictures.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
gumgardner
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:47 pm
Posts: 3553
Location: Pittsburgh
@donald...I'm not exactly certain about the weight being with the hangers. All I know is this was the weight before it was sent to the painter. Nick told me that the weight was sub 640g, so this weight 648g might include them. But like I said, I'm not sure. The matte finish will likely add 20-30g to the final weight.

_________________
RUEGAMER 5.21kg, 11.48lbs

CRUMPTON 4.40kg, 9.70lbs
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Fuchspk
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:38 pm
Posts: 274
Location: Sweden
nice looking frame :)
i actually do not like the cabelstops as you could do them a bit more slimmed and lighter...but hey, not every body is perfect :lol:
just joking a bit....

will be fun to follow this build.

_________________
my 4053g - 8,935lbs Bike: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=98639
Top
   
Reply with quote  
fallen86
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 11:12 am
Posts: 45
with all the razor-blade work you do on your components i would have guessed you'd go with a nude carbon finish instead of a matte black... 30 grams in paint? blasphemy! :evil:
Top
   
Reply with quote  
bikemaniack
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 272
The frame is only few grams heavier than the frame from "World lightest bike" project.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
gumgardner
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:47 pm
Posts: 3553
Location: Pittsburgh
fallen86 wrote:
with all the razor-blade work you do on your components i would have guessed you'd go with a nude carbon finish instead of a matte black... 30 grams in paint? blasphemy! :evil:


I've considered that...removing it will give me something to do though :twisted:

Fuchspk wrote:
nice looking frame :)
i actually do not like the cabelstops as you could do them a bit more slimmed and lighter...but hey, not every body is perfect :lol:
just joking a bit....

will be fun to follow this build.


Talk to Nick :wink:

_________________
RUEGAMER 5.21kg, 11.48lbs

CRUMPTON 4.40kg, 9.70lbs
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Fuchspk
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:38 pm
Posts: 274
Location: Sweden
like i said, just joking a little. he do really nice frames and stuff.
and i can see why he build them this way.

_________________
my 4053g - 8,935lbs Bike: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=98639
Top
   
Reply with quote  
gumgardner
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:47 pm
Posts: 3553
Location: Pittsburgh
@fuchspk: I was just kidding. :wink:

Here is the fork that I am going with...the extremely hard to find THM Scapula SP. This is the new, reworked model. THM no longer offers the "tuned" version. The SP is the lightest that they offer. This is the pic of the fork, uncut and before it was finished to match the frame.

Image
By gumgardner at 2012-01-20

_________________
RUEGAMER 5.21kg, 11.48lbs

CRUMPTON 4.40kg, 9.70lbs
Top
   
Reply with quote  
TOflat
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 5:43 am
Posts: 156
You should have a poll to see who will guess the final weight when finished. (By the way things are going I'll say 8.6lbs when all said and done).

I saw the weight of the frame and now I want more!
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Weenie
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:55 pm 


Top
   
 
nicrump
 Post subject: Re: Gum's CRUMPTON UL
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 4:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 5:18 pm
Posts: 741
Location: Austin
Fuchspk wrote:
nice looking frame :)
i actually do not like the cabelstops as you could do them a bit more slimmed and lighter...but hey, not every body is perfect :lol:
just joking a bit....

will be fun to follow this build.


they are 3 grams each. they are not as bulky as you think but they do have a lot of surface area because i do not want them popping off when you grab a ton of brake lever or stuff that front shift hard.

_________________
www.crumptoncycles.com


Last edited by nicrump on Fri Jan 20, 2012 4:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  Page 2 of 20
  [ 296 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 20 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2 Moots and a Crumpton

in For sale - Pictures are mandatory 22-3-13

jonjones13

0

651

Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:23 pm

jonjones13 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Crumpton vs Argonaut ?

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

eaglejackson

35

3081

Wed Aug 17, 2016 7:32 pm

scb View the latest post


» »

All times are UTC+01:00

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media, parker0320, Pulsarxxx and 14 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited