Best rear MTB tire??

Discuss light weight issues concerning mountain bikes & parts.

Moderator: Moderator Team

Post Reply
User avatar
cyclemanpat
Posts: 1555
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Location: Kentucky, USA

by cyclemanpat

I want some feedback on which rear tire is best for average packed, very technical trails. Trails have lots of rocks and roots and short steep climbs. Looking for good traction and light weight???

User avatar
Frankie - B
Admin - In the industry
Posts: 6573
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 8:17 am
Location: Drenthe, Holland

by Frankie - B

What do you call lightweight? 300gr? 400 gr? the schwalbe fast fred and racing ralph are both very nice tires. The fred is 360 gr. and semi slick. the ralph is 460 gr. and a knobblie. But it has the rolling resistance of an semi slick 8)

Good luck.

(maybe you can start a poll!)
'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'
If you want to see 'meh' content of me and my bike you can follow my life in pictures here!

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



nikh
Posts: 1923
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 8:05 pm

by nikh

Have you considered the Nokian NBX Lite?

It is primarily a race tire but it sure is fast and fairly light!

I found mine for $30.99 at Aebike.com

Mbuk had a review on them:

http://www.mbuk.com/kittestdetails.asp?id=237

User avatar
elendil
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Karlsruhe (Germany)
Contact:

by elendil

For technical trails I would not take a "semi-slick" or "semi-knob" tire as Fast Fred or Twister (Supersonic). If weight is very important Michelin Comp S light or Nokian NBX lite or perhaps Schwalbe Racing Ralph, if weight is not that important Michelin XL S (good grip and low rolling resistance, approx. 550g).

User avatar
Sandal
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 2:10 pm
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine
Contact:

by Sandal

if we're talking about racing, then i would suggest Kenda klimax lite. it's 345-350g semislick. 1.75 (thou claimed 1.95) it can be well combined with maxxis flylight 1.5 tube (90g) and you've got one of the lightest rear wheel setups on the market.
unless you ride in real muddy conditions, or expect superb braking and turn traction on the downhills, Kenda is likely the best of all i tried, whihc are Contis supersonic, traction, escape, t+c, Mich Light S, Maxxis flylight, mosquitos and python(also very good but rather heavy IMHO).
weight concerned = good, weight obsessed = bad!

User avatar
Frankie - B
Admin - In the industry
Posts: 6573
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 8:17 am
Location: Drenthe, Holland

by Frankie - B

ehm sandal,

he's looking for a tire that will hold up with rocks and roots. I'm a kenda lover myself. (ride with kozmic lite's) but i think that the klimax won't hold up with rocks....
'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'
If you want to see 'meh' content of me and my bike you can follow my life in pictures here!

User avatar
nzkiwiguy
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:18 pm
Location: Colorado

by nzkiwiguy

Maxxis Larson TT 1.9 460gm. Great traction and little rollong resistence. Use for everything but mud.

User avatar
jer
Posts: 553
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: Anchorage, AK

by jer

I've had great luck with the WTB Epicwolf. It's a bit heavier than the superlights, but much tougher and it rolls fast too. 465-475g for the race 1.95 version.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Post Reply