Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Thu Aug 25, 2016 4:20 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 8:09 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1980
Location: NoVA/DC
clingenpeel-
congrats on having no issues with mounting your setup.
on the SL4, i had a compact srm on a specialized crank. the compact srm may have a slightly smaller ID for the relief around the bb shell.

ms6073,
the reason you could not use the sram pf30 bb with your setup is you only tried mounting it with the srm bearing shield. you would most likely have been able to use it if you either:
removed the supplemental seal over the left bearing, or
used the sram-provided bearing shields on both sides.
the sram bearing shields have a larger relief under it to clear their seals.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 5:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:40 pm
Posts: 1390
this will solve any issues; (install these, SRM bearing shield, SRM spindle, and tons of clearance)

http://www.cannondaleexperts.com/Cannon ... p_480.html

http://www.cannondaleexperts.com/Cannon ... _p_32.html

http://www.cannondaleexperts.com/Cannon ... _p_33.html


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Posts: 1834
Location: Houston, Texas
thisisatest wrote:
ms6073,
the reason you could not use the sram pf30 bb with your setup is you only tried mounting it with the srm bearing shield.
Possibly, but I spent a number of hours trying all possible combinations of shields/seals/spacers/spindles with marginal results yet swapping out the SRAM PF30 for the FSA PF30 worked with the SRM bearing shield, SRM spindle, and 3 spacers.

_________________
Michael - The Anaerobic Threshold is neither...


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Posts: 1834
Location: Houston, Texas
cswi9367 wrote:
this will solve any issues; (install these, SRM bearing shield, SRM spindle, and tons of clearance)
http://www.cannondaleexperts.com/Cannon ... p_480.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Having ordered the Cannondale KP197/SRM PF30 bottom bracket kit, I will find out how well it works this weekend now that I have a can of the Loctite primer to go with the Loctitte 609. Interesting to note that Cannondale's bonding instructions supplied with the bottom bracket kit outline installation for a SRAM PF30 bottom bracket and not the Cannondale specific parts. This has me wondering after I bond/press in the alloy press-fit shell cups, do I then repeat the process of applying Loctite Primer & 609 Retaining Fluid to the inner races of the alloy shell and the outer part of the bearings before pressing them in? I am guessing the answer would be yes in order to avoid creaking like with the BB30 bottom brackets.

_________________
Michael - The Anaerobic Threshold is neither...


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:40 pm
Posts: 1390
the use of 609 is suggested, yes. personally, i dont use anything. i press the cups in without loctite. if you want to loctite the bearings into the PF30 cups, go for it.

personally, i still wish it was BB30, but PF30 is easier to manufacture for everyone else due to more open tolerances.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:12 pm
Posts: 26
I'm trying to find out more about the older wired SRMs.
Is it possible to fit the older, non bevel srm to a pf30 Evo frame? With the 'tricks' above, or are the tricks to get the never beveld wired/wireless srms to fit?

Thanks


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:28 pm
Posts: 220
When you use the srm specific pf 30 cups, what effect does that have of the chain line? Does the crank shift either direction?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:38 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1980
Location: NoVA/DC
No effect on chainline. The lip on the cups is much thinner, beveled. The bearings themselves end up in the same place.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Posts: 1834
Location: Houston, Texas
skinnyrider wrote:
Is it possible to fit the older, non bevel SRM to a pf30 Evo frame?
Out of the box with no modifications, no. I think you will find that it is possible if you order the new SISL2 spindle (KP248). Alternately, you could locate a local machinist to modify your existing spindle to remove the shoulder as discussed here.

_________________
Michael - The Anaerobic Threshold is neither...


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 8:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:55 am
Posts: 592
My cannondale SRM worked just fine with the cannondale srm spindle and NDS bearing shield you need to have anyway. A bit of work with spacers but it worked fine on my EVO.

_________________
Just ride ..


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) RD 6870 / RD 6770 differences

in Road

jay cee

8

531

Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:44 pm

glepore View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Easton EC90SLX differences

in Road

cep111

2

393

Sat Sep 26, 2015 3:28 am

cep111 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Size differences between Veloflex and Vittoria

in Road

fignonsbarber

5

651

Mon Aug 08, 2016 7:28 pm

spookyload View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Lightweight - model year and differences

in Road

ebsilon

0

296

Tue Feb 23, 2016 1:29 pm

ebsilon View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Shoe sizing differences Scott Road RC

in Road

Vermu

0

129

Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:17 am

Vermu View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 11.4, albertop07, Bing [Bot], Mockenrue, MSNbot Media, Shrike, sungod, William, Yahoo [Bot] and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited