HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:25 am
Posts: 152
Location: Australia
I quite like the look of this bike, and it seems pretty reasonably priced:

Image

I tend to ride fairly easy single track and firetrails etc. I'm not super interested in hardcore downhill stuff.

What are peoples opinion of this model- I think it's very well specced for the price. The only obvious difference from the other more expensive models is the fork. How is the Fatty 80mm regarded? And indeed is 80mm sufficient for my needs? There is a big step-up in price when you get the Lefty fork. I quite like the simplicity of the Fatty as it means I can use my existing wheels.

Being a Flash, I expect it to be quite favorable in the weight department :)

Many thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:25 am
Posts: 2194
Location: Southern Indiana USA
I don't have any personal experience, but after paying $200 to get my Fox rebuilt and knowing that 80mm is plenty of travel for me, I think the fork is a brilliant idea and probably much lighter than the almost 4 lb Fox and SRAM forks.

_________________
For certain parts stiffer is more important than lighter.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 3:48 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 4:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:25 pm
Posts: 476
I have a Flash 1 so can't comment on the the Fatty fork. I do feel 80mm of travel is sufficient for general off road riding.

The frame itself is pretty good. It's very agile, perfect for singletracks. It does however have a relatively harsh ride, the flexible chain stay design doesn't work as well as on the carbon equivalent.
I'm gonna try a wider tire in the future to compensate for this.

On the subject of forks, my Lefty developed a creak and was serviced under warranty.
So good points there for the customer survice.

_________________
  • 2011 Cannondale Flash F1
  • 2010 Cannondale Caad9
  • 2000 Caad 4 aero



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 11:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:25 am
Posts: 152
Location: Australia
Many thanks for replies!

I was hoping 80mm would be enough travel, so that allays my doubts.
Interesting you mention the Flash frame being rather harsh- I suppose the ride quality and geometry is more suited to a race bike? Like you mention better keep the tyre size larger.

Cannondale say the Flash frame is 1450 grams- how does that compare with other aluminium hardtail frames? The Fatty fork is 1250 grams I believe which should result in a pretty light bike.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 11:25 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:26 pm
Posts: 682
Location: Australia
I think for the money it's a reasonably light bike.

The Fatty HeadShok is like an institution at Cannondale. It's a tried and tested reliable set up. It's what Cadel Evans was using when he was winning MTB World Champs all those years ago.

I havent checked weights in that category, but if it's around the weight of an equivalent Scott Scale I'd say you're onto a good thing.

_________________
Lefty heaven


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:25 am
Posts: 152
Location: Australia
Just a question about changing over the cranks- I'm probably going to get the 2 chainring XTR M985 cranks as an upgrade and get rid of the triple this bike comes with.
If I get the XTR cranks, will I also have to get the specific double front derailleur and XTR shifters? Or can I just use the existing triple stuff but limit off the triple?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:33 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:26 pm
Posts: 682
Location: Australia
You should be able to just adjust the limit screws and tune it to just 2 positions on the shifter. I've done it on both Shimano and Sram in the past.

_________________
Lefty heaven


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:25 am
Posts: 152
Location: Australia
Thanks for the reply.

And now I'm tossing up the sizing- Cannondale sizing is a bit weird in that I'm 179cm tall, the medium is 43.3cm/17" while the large is 47.5cm/18.7".

I've opted for the large but I sort of fit between the medium and large which is annoying


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 9:18 am
Posts: 14
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
How did the size L work out for you?

I'm 184cm and my road bike is a Merlin CR size M (55,5cm actual top tube with a 120mm stem). I really like the low stand over height - also for riding curves because i can use my underlegs to balance the bike through tight corners when descending standing up while in the hoods.

I tend to prefer smaller bikes, but Cannondale size guides says that if your between 179 and 186 should chose a size L. however the top tube seems kind of long and stand over height is 1cm taler than my road Merlin - This is my first MTB.

Does anyone know the standard stem length on Cannondale Flas 26" MTB size M and L ?

_________________
--
mvh. Morten Reippuert Knudsen @Merlin Works CR/Chorus 07


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 12:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:25 am
Posts: 152
Location: Australia
reippuert wrote:
How did the size L work out for you?

I'm 184cm and my road bike is a Merlin CR size M (55,5cm actual top tube with a 120mm stem).


Pretty well! I'm 180cm and the large is on the slightly larger size, but it's totally fine. What's difficult is that I'm a height which is pretty much between a medium and a large so I could totally ride either. Good thing about the large is that I can run a standard 100mm stem, while with the medium I guess I'd need to run a 120mm stem, which of course is getting long for modern MTB standards.

The only negative with the large is that the standover height is marginally higher.

Here is an image of the bike when I first got it to give you a sense of the seatpost height:

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:04 pm
Posts: 510
Location: Sunny UK
L frame, 303 mm from top of seatpost clamp to top of saddle.


Attachments:
DSC07793.JPG
DSC07793.JPG [ 64.91 KiB | Viewed 4781 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 11:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 1:37 am
Posts: 245
Location: Sewickley, PA
Is the Flash still available with the fatty head shock fork? I can't find it listed, I want one to replace my old reliable 26'r.

_________________
Curt Brown
2012 Cannondale Supersix EVO SRAM Red 12.5#'s

2011 Cannondale Carbon Flash 1 17.9#'s

http://cbevo.com/2012_cd_supersix_evo_31.html


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 11:34 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cannondale carbon flash 3 - 2013

in MTB

RobThacks

3

1036

Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:40 pm

the_marsbar View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. cannondale flash 26" frame... size small or medium

in Wanted

cyclemanpat

0

108

Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:27 am

cyclemanpat View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2012 Cannondale EVO Hi-Mod top tube

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

252002

22

1813

Tue Apr 29, 2014 5:16 pm

Qman View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2012 Cannondale Scalpel 3 26"

in MTB

fivethirtyonepm

5

783

Wed Apr 16, 2014 8:15 pm

the_marsbar View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) CANNONDALE SS EVO 2012 - 5.58KG (12lbs 5oz) - Details added

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

Argonite

11

2961

Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:30 am

Argonite View the latest post


It is currently Wed Sep 17, 2014 4:46 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB