Cranks?

The spirit of Grav-lo-cross. No but seriously, cyclocross and gravel go here!

Moderator: Moderator Team

User avatar
Mads Kock
Posts: 2750
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:52 am
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Contact:

by Mads Kock

I just got myself a used Ridley Supercross 2003 cross-frame. I'm very new into cyclocross (though I've been admiring from a distance for quite sometimes and now it was time to try it).

What crankarm length is the "normal" length? 170 or 172,5 or mtb-standard 175mm? Is it possible to use a mtb-cranks for cyclocross?

I was thinking about the new ultegra compact cranks or maybe the new carbon bontrager cranks - both looks good!

What is the "normal" gearing for a crossbike, front and rear?

sorry for all my questions - hope to get some answers!! thanks!

Mads

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



User avatar
Skyleth
Posts: 1083
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:59 pm
Location: Boston, MA, USA

by Skyleth

I'm pretty new to cross myself, I just picked up a used Empella Bonfire, I've got 36/48 in the front and 12-25/27 in the rear... I've seen alot of pros (Nys) running a single chain ring in the front at 42 teeth...

My crank arms are 172.5 just like my road bike

If you're new to cross, I'd stay away from the carbon cranks (for now anyway) no sense in getting all that nice carbon all scratched up!

User avatar
simon
Resident Pro
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:34 am

by simon

hello mads, welcome to cyclocross!
first: if racers run a single chainring, it is usually 42 tooth, sometimes 44 tooth. 11-23 is fine for most of the courses, but 12-25 is fine as well. i don't really like 12-27 for racing because of the 3 t-jumps from 21 to 24 and from 24-27. if you use your cross bike for light bike tours, i would rather go for a double chainring setup, because there will be longer uphills and you don't want to go full speed on them all the time just to be able to pedal. in races 39-46 or 39-48 is normal, chainrings over 48 do not make sense, also because if you jump over obstacles, you can bang the chainring onto the obstacle.
i use the same crank arm length as on the road bike(172,5 mm), but if you are used to 175 from the mtb, i would choose 175 mm for cross as well, with the disadvantage that your shoes are on the ground in narrow corners earlier, if you start to accelerate(same point as for road criterium bikes). if you're used to mtb, i would then also go for 39-48 with 12-27, or a compact crank with 36 inner chainring. too much difference between the chainrings is bad because f chain tension, if you ride singletrails with roots in the small chainring the chain can easily fall off(deda or other plastic parts are a tip, think they're also calles 3rd eye or dogfang)you have to try if mtb cranks work with the frame(because the chain stays are wider apart for the tire clearance), but i would not do that. a cross bike is much faster than an mtb because of the 28 inch wheels, you won't use the small chainrings.
i have dura ace cranks on my cyclocross bike, i had to modify a little bit. i placed a shimano 9 speed cassette spacer between the right bearing and the frame to get the crank further outside, because the chainring was scratching on the frame. i think that mtb cranks come with those kind of spacers, but it was sunday evening and i had to build the bikes together...

User avatar
Dr.Dos
Posts: 1073
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 11:00 pm

by Dr.Dos

simon wrote:i would choose 175 mm for cross as well, with the disadvantage that your shoes are on the ground in narrow corners earlier, if you start to accelerate(same point as for road criterium bikes).


simon, everything you say makes perfect sense. But since most modern CX races are off-road criteriums, some bikes have higher bbs just like the special criterium bikes on the road. My OCCP is built slightly higher than my old Empellas and I love it. Sure, often an Empella feels "smaller" or "more nimble" but when pedaling through turns or coasting and accelerating hard on the exit you have the clearance between pedals and ground that you need.

User avatar
Mads Kock
Posts: 2750
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:52 am
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Contact:

by Mads Kock

Thanks Simon - that was a very good ecplaination about the gears! I guess I will have to try some different but I think I will start with 12-25/27 on the rear and 39-46 in the front.

I'm not sure about if I should go for a compact crankset or just normal - looks like 46 and 48 is available in both types of cranks?! (I think I will go for 172,5mm crankarms)

I was also wondering about the front derailleur - is it possible to use a topswing derailleur with toppull rather than the downswing? would save so grams here!

User avatar
simon
Resident Pro
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:34 am

by simon

hello mads
no problem, that's the sense of a forum...
i tried mtb front derailleurs, because many cross frames have the cable down the seattube and the cable goes around some kind of pulley to direct it 180°, then normal road fd's are used. the problem is that this pulley is a magnet for mud, grass, etc.
but i never got to a point where mtb fd's worked right. they're usually made for 42 t chainrings, and with 46 or 48 they don't really work(you can bend them with hammer or so, but that's not really the way to treat expensive parts). there is a little metal piece to convert a normal road derailleur that it functions with the cable coming directly from the top. it is a little bit hard to explain, but it is the best solution. if you're interested, i can try to get you one of them.

PNuT
Posts: 1332
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 6:33 pm

by PNuT

new compact cranks???/ are they not just old mtb ones?
21 for road 27 for mtb :D

User avatar
Mads Kock
Posts: 2750
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:52 am
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Contact:

by Mads Kock

New for road cranksets ;-)

Maybe I could just use a mtb-cranks with 46/34!

To Simon - sounds good! do you have some pictures of that derailleur-improvement? What is the price of this thing?

User avatar
Cyco
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 4:49 am

by Cyco

simon wrote:i tried mtb front derailleurs, because many cross frames have the cable down the seattube and the cable goes around some kind of pulley to direct it 180°, then normal road fd's are used. the problem is that this pulley is a magnet for mud, grass, etc.
but i never got to a point where mtb fd's worked right. they're usually made for 42 t chainrings, and with 46 or 48 they don't really work


If you get a XTR front derailler of 95x or previous series they are designed 48t chainrings. The current 96x ones are designed for 44t rings.

The new road derailleurs designed for compact cranks should also work well.
Success is how far you you bounce back up after being knocked down

User avatar
Boonen
Posts: 2407
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 7:33 am
Location: Europe

by Boonen

simon wrote: there is a little metal piece to convert a normal road derailleur that it functions with the cable coming directly from the top. it is a little bit hard to explain, but it is the best solution. if you're interested, i can try to get you one of them.


Simon, do you happen to have a picture of this thing? I'm not really concerned about the extra weight of the cable and the turning wheel as my crossbike isn't much of an ww bike, but it sounds like a good add-on to make shifting better in muddy conditions.
Would it work with campy shifters and fd?

User avatar
simon
Resident Pro
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:34 am

by simon

i've just decided to have one of my three bikes with 39-46, so i'm waiting for my converter(don't have a better name for it). i hope to get it next weekend, then i will make pics of it and put it on a scale. i think the weight of this piece is nearly the weight that you lose by dismounting the pulley and shortening the cable.

User avatar
Mads Kock
Posts: 2750
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:52 am
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Contact:

by Mads Kock

3 crossbikes? nice - what bikes do you have? :D

User avatar
simon
Resident Pro
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:34 am

by simon

ridley x-night. have a look at the new cyclocross season topic, there is a pic of one of them. i hope to have some time left, then i will make a few detailed pics and a spec list with weights.
if you race, you need at least 2 bikes, better 3. and off course, several pairs of wheels with different gears and tubulars.

User avatar
Mads Kock
Posts: 2750
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:52 am
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Contact:

by Mads Kock

Hmmm - if I like riding my crossbike it would really suck!!!! 2-3 crossbikes, 2 mtb's (fully and hardtail) and 1 roadbike - too much money :cry:

User avatar
Cyco
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 4:49 am

by Cyco

Mads Kock wrote:Hmmm - if I like riding my crossbike it would really suck!!!! 2-3 crossbikes, 2 mtb's (fully and hardtail) and 1 roadbike


Well you havn't even listed the track bike, SS, fixed gear road bike and TT bike yet, maybe time to get saving :wink: :lol:

simon wrote:i've just decided to have one of my three bikes with 39-46, so i'm waiting for my converter(don't have a better name for it). i hope to get it next weekend, then i will make pics of it and put it on a scale. i think the weight of this piece is nearly the weight that you lose by dismounting the pulley and shortening the cable.


Can you please discribe this in more detail please? I'm not sure what you are describing.
Success is how far you you bounce back up after being knocked down

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Post Reply