Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Wed Sep 28, 2016 6:20 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous 13 4 5 6 7 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7899
Location: San Francisco, CA
Starting from a 73 deg seat tube angle, it's approx 1 cm per degree difference per 60 cm distance from the rails to the BB spindle. So 72 cm to 72 degrees would be 1.2 cm shift in required seat post offset.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:13 am
Posts: 852
Location: Utah
Great build.

Any info on your expereice witht he AX stem would be great to hear.

There are not too many actually ride reports on it.


Top
   
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:24 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:13 am
Posts: 1
The R5ca geometry is the same as the R5 and 2011 R3 assuming you use a zero-offset seatpost. It was designed to specifically to allow weight weenies to use a lighter, zero-offset post. So only an extra-long femur would place the rider back far enough to use the the typical 25mm offset post unless you want to rotate your entire body to a more upright position. I think you'll find this frame is as tough as they come and one of the stiffest in BB and torsion out there. Anxious to hear some ride reports!

Just starting to plan a weight weenie bike for myself so I'll tune in regularly. (Full disclosure...I work for Cervelo's engineering group but any opinions are solely my own!)


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:19 am
Posts: 15
Nice bike Sedluk!

I've just bought a R5 and was wondering how straightforward it was to fit the VumaQuad crank? Did you have to use the SRAM/Rotor BB and spacers etc. that came with the frame or does Zipp produce a specific BBright BB? No-one over here in Oz seems to know and the Cervelo website isn't very clear.

cheers


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:31 am
Posts: 356
Location: LOS ANGELES
Beautiful!

_________________
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=132557


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:22 am
Posts: 380
Location: Seattle, WA
GREAT looking build!

Those frames feel like they're going to float away in your hands!

_________________
2011 Trek Paragon 29er | Reba XX 120mm Fork | XX Drivetrain | 160mm White/Carbon Exiler CR Brakes | Thomson 90mm Stem & Post | Easton Monkey Lite Bar | X.9 Hubs to DT Swiss X470's | Schwalbe Rocket Rons


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 404
The VumaQuad crank install was pretty easy. The R5ca has press fit bearings already installed from the factory. The BB on the frame does not have any metal, the bearings were pressed into the carbon BB. There was one bearing seal on the non-drive side, a bearing seal on the drive side, a 11.5mm spacer and a wavy washer the best I can remember. The crank was perfectly centered with that and ready to go. So far I like the crank, dropped the chain once while down shifting, I will adjust the front derailleur now that the cables have a few shifts on them. Rode 105 hard miles on Saturday.

I have ordered an Ax Lightness premium no setback seatpost, will see if that will fit. I will want the seatpost to secure to the carbon wrap on the saddle rails. It looks like it will be close but might work.

I have ordered a couple of headset to try out. The AER headset is not for me. It may be lighter than air but is not really suited to my kind of riding. It is very finicky. The norglide easily gets off track. Not a problem, the headset is a standard size and I will try out some light headsets with bearings. Maybe the FSA Orbit IS or another Cane Creek, I have ordered both.

I rotated the handlebar up a little and will move the shifters forward on the handlebar. The stem will be lowered a little. Once I get comfortable I will cut the fork tube down some more.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:49 am
Posts: 1447
Location: Europe
sedluk wrote:
The AER headset is not for me. It may be lighter than air but is not really suited to my kind of riding. It is very finicky.
Cane Creek sent me one of the first Aer headsets and I never had issues with them. --> http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=61381 :smartass:

Now I got both the Aer ZS and the Aer IS. Once a NorGlide bushing was worn out and subsequently replaced. I'm so pleased with this product that I'll use the Aer on my next bike too. :thumbup:

I'm not exactly easy on my stuff. Back in '08 I got myself a pair of VumaQuad cranks whose spline interface I ruined relatively quickly into service life. I think it took mere months. They developed excess play in the arm interface that basically rendered them useless, even though they were otherwise intact. They correctly installed but since the failure I never touched them again. I ended up donating them to a friend as they never worked properly for me. :roll:

It's like the saying... different strokes for different folks.

_________________
“I always find it amazing that a material can actually sell a product when it’s really the engineering that creates and dictates how well that material will behave or perform.” — Chuck Teixeira

RideWert.com
Wert Cycling on Facebook


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7899
Location: San Francisco, CA
The interesting thing about the R5CA geometry is the seat tube is set-forward, so it's not a pure 72 degrees:

Image
Image

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 6:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 6:06 am
Posts: 969
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Sedluk that is one awesome machine, black logos on the Lightweights would just finish it off nicely. Weight is phenomenal without being for show only.
:beerchug:

_________________
Ozrider - Western Australia
Parlee Z5 XL (6055g/13.32lbs) Trek Madone 5.9 (7052-7500g)Jonesman Columbus Spirit (8680g)
Chase your dreams - it's only impossible until it's done


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:19 pm
Posts: 1958
Location: On Pave
Still cant understand why this hasnt been made a StickY :|

_________________
i like people... i just can't stand assholes


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7899
Location: San Francisco, CA
Here's that plot again, but I drew a line along the seat tube:
Image

It appears the intercept is 1 cm ahead of the BB center.

So the effective seat tube angle is:

STA = arccos [ cos 72° ‒ 1 cm / L' ]

where L' is the distance from the top of the saddle to the height of the BB center along the seat tube.

The derivative of arccos = ‒ 1 / sin, so I can approximate that as:

STA = 72° + [ 1 cm / ( L' sin 72° ) ] 180° / π
= 72° + 60.2° cm / L'

So if L = 73 cm, for example:

STA = 72.8°

So it wouldn't be that different from the R5, actually.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 7:15 pm
Posts: 108
Location: Blacklick, OH - U.S. of A.
This is impressive Mr. M. I heard about it and now I see why J. is raving about it so much. Nice setup!!! Have you tried the Tufo Elite 23 tires? I really like them and at 250g you"l be saving a bit more weight, not that the R5ca doesn't suffer from acute anorexia, but just a thought... I'll see you soon man!

_________________
MASTER says... FASTER!!! ...but my leg still hurts...


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 8233
Location: Geelong
I like! :shock:

_________________
http://www.nicksquillari.com.au


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:53 am
Posts: 38
Sweet build!

_________________
Mr.Gib wrote:
I think this is where you are making a mistake. If it was my money I'd be looking for a frame that climbs like a scalded baby monkey on amphetamines. A goat on steroids will just not be as fast uphill.



Top
   
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:23 pm 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous 13 4 5 6 7 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. bb question about the cervelo r5ca

in Road

liketoride

6

498

Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:09 pm

liketoride View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cervelo R5Ca Di2 5.32kg - "cedced74"

in Comments

nmx

0

256

Sat Oct 03, 2015 9:27 am

nmx View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cervelo R5Ca / Di2 / AX Lightness 5.32kg

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

964Cup

44

6413

Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:12 am

junghwan View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cervelo 2012 R5ca Frameset Sz 51 - Updated with Better Pics

in For sale - Pictures are mandatory 22-3-13

RyanH

0

441

Mon Aug 29, 2016 4:00 am

RyanH View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Ryan's Ostentatious Fred Sled (Cervelo R5ca) - "Final" pics on pg 15

[ Go to page: 113 14 15 16 17 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

RyanH

241

31730

Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:25 am

ProN3wbie View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited