Cervelo R5ca 51cm 11.1 lbs

Who are you (no off-topic talk please)

Moderator: Moderator Team

Post Reply
sawyer
Posts: 4472
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Location: Natovi Landing

by sawyer

Great to see one of these on here. Awesome weight on a high-end build and kudos for not putting tofus on for the shoot.

I agree with others re. the gatorskins - old hoses ... but you've made your defence.

And the ST angle wld never work for me but alas it's not mine.
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!! :thumbup:

by Weenie


Santoki
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:42 pm

by Santoki

I love your attitude on this bike, go with what works for you. :thumbup:

I'm not one for "Sunday best" in my mind a bike is to be ridden regardless of whether it is $500 or $10k+ and using top spec parts is all the better so long as they don't let you down. So I'm all with you on gatorskins on lightweights. In my mind the way I get most value out of my bikes is to ride them as much as possible, I tend to want to replace parts before they wear out anyway.

ashley77
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:18 am

by ashley77

Why do you weenies compete against eachother who has the lightest bike?
Whats it all about?

User avatar
Dov
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:45 pm
Location: London

by Dov

It's more 'mutual appreciation' than competition
Felt F1 DA Di2
Cinelli Supercorsa
Cielo Classic Sportif
Concorde Shopper
Nagasawa Fixie Skid Machine
Cannondale CAAD 10 Track [custom]

Employee of Rapha
Instagram
Strava

User avatar
Dov
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:45 pm
Location: London

by Dov

Surely a website named weight-weenies should have deterred you if the pursuit of light bikes is not to your taste.

A bit daft eh?
Felt F1 DA Di2
Cinelli Supercorsa
Cielo Classic Sportif
Concorde Shopper
Nagasawa Fixie Skid Machine
Cannondale CAAD 10 Track [custom]

Employee of Rapha
Instagram
Strava

soriyu
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:13 pm

by soriyu

:thumbup:

is all I can think of... :wink:

collegiateRacer
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:36 am
Location: USA
Contact:

by collegiateRacer

kgt wrote:It also seems to me that using a non setback seatpost and a longer stem would be better.


I take it you have no knowledge of bike fit? :roll:

BTW, nice bike.

maxxevv
Posts: 1952
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:51 am

by maxxevv

kgt wrote:It also seems to me that using a non setback seatpost and a longer stem would be better.


And why so ? From an aesthetic viewpoint ?

User avatar
Frankie - B
Administrator
Posts: 6591
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 8:17 am
Location: Drenthe, Holland

by Frankie - B

@ collegiateracer & Maxxevv,

Cervelo designed the bike to be used with a 0 setback post. The seat tube is noticeably slacker then on other bikes.
'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'

BERNARDO
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:35 am

by BERNARDO

oh my gooooood!
What a beautiful bike!

Congratulations.

sedluk
Posts: 409
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:10 am

by sedluk

To clear up some confusion. Cervelo did not design this bike so that it could ONLY accept a zero setback seatpost.

What they did was lower the angle of the seatpost tube to allow many more riders the use of a lighter zero setback seatposts.

In my case, I ordered the frame something like 7 months ago. I wanted to get my parts ready so that when I received the frame I could build it up. I wanted an Ax Lightness seatpost and had to decide between the premium setback model or the no setback.

I knew that even with a 72 degree seatpost angle I would be close. It is simple geometry, on the smaller frames like a 51cm, the 72 degree seatpost angle moves the post back something like 1cm. I am out of town, when I get back I can actually measure the distance compared to the R5. On a larger frame the 72 degree angle moves the seatpost back further.

I am 5"7" and wear size 11 Mavic Huez shoes and have a somewhat normal if not a little on the long side femur. Nothing really out of the ordinary but I thought it would be close. I knew that if I bought the more expensive setback seatpost I would be riding soon after I got the frame. If I bought the no setback seatpost and it did not work I would be ordering a new seatpost and waiting.

You can check yourself, Fairwheel is currently out of stock on both premium (setback and no setback) 27.2 mm L1 seatposts. And guess how long you could be waiting for a seatpost from Ax Lightness. I am not going to put them down, they make great products. But even if you order something directly out of Germany, you might be waiting a while and sitting around looking at that new frame.

Once I have the saddle position dialed in I will be able to decide if I can use a no setback seatpost. There is a good chance that I will be able to use a no setback seatpost, but I think it will be close. If I can use a no setback I will be waiting for a while, Ax Lightness makes great products but getting them can often take some time. In the meantime I will be riding with my perfectly acceptable seatpost.

Raxel
Posts: 1039
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:41 pm

by Raxel

Super build and super photograph. 1Dsmk3 with 200mm 1.8?
:podium: :podium: :podium: :podium:

So the frameset alone weighs around 690gr for size 51?
That's almost the same weight as the lightest one I have ever seen. (I scaled the the ruegamer zen uberlight and it weighed 688gr w/o hanger) I think this frame is quite an achievement for big brand frame. Is the fork steerer tapered?

User avatar
timintense
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:01 pm
Location: UK

by timintense

I didnt realise when i first commented on this bike how much this total build would cost :shock: i mean i knew the ax-lightness kit and lightweights would make it expensive but i hadnt realised the cost of that frame. Truely Epic build on that note :thumbup:
My bikes:-
- 2014 Lapierre Zesty AM 727-11.9kg
- 2012 Storck Fenomalist Di2 - 7.1kg

Carbon - Lightens your bike and your wallet
OCBD - Obsessive Compulsive Biking Disorder

User avatar
djconnel
Posts: 7926
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

by djconnel

sedluk wrote:I knew that even with a 72 degree seatpost angle I would be close. It is simple geometry, on the smaller frames like a 51cm, the 72 degree seatpost angle moves the post back something like 1cm. I am out of town, when I get back I can actually measure the distance compared to the R5. On a larger frame the 72 degree angle moves the seatpost back further.


Don't sweat the seatpost. But this isn't correct. The amount the seat is moved back depends on the saddle-to-BB distance, not the frame size. And if the seat tube axis intersects the BB axis, then the you'd expect this to scale with rider height, anyway, so there's no reason to believe a smaller frame is more likely to use a setback post than a larger one.

sedluk
Posts: 409
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:10 am

by sedluk

What I was trying to say was I found it difficult to precisely calculate exactly how much further back the seatpost on the R5ca would meet the saddle compared to my R5. On a 51cm frame I estimated that it would work out to around 1cm, that the seatpost would hit the saddle around 1cm further back than on the R5. I could look at my R5 and see where the seatpost was hitting the saddle and knew that I would need the seatpost to hit at least 1cm further back and even that would be close.

If you had a 58cm frame and your current setup only required a small setback, something like 1cm then you could feel comfortable ordering a no setback seatpost and be confident that it would work. Moving from a 73 degree angle to 72 would move you back say 1.5cm.

Not to knock Cervelo but they gave very few details about the R5ca geometry. It is hard to tell from the photo, but it almost looks like the seat tube starts out by going up from the BB and then transitions into a 72 degree angle.

I hope that by posting my experience that others will be able to benefit.

by Weenie


Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post