HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 266 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:33 pm
Posts: 251
nickel does look hot. i had it on an orange p7. it was great.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 2:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Posts: 2478
Received the first draft of the design and geometry today. We're making a few minor adjustments based on my fitting and the builder's concepts. I'll post final geometry once we've reached a consensus. I have to admit, I like actually working with someone to build MY bike, rather than buying parts to get the best fit to a stock frame. This is going to be fun even if not the lightest bike I've ever owned.

Still undecided on di2 though...

_________________
TED
Schoorl, Noord-Holland, Nederland
Bike Pics
English Custom Steel Internal di2
Litespeed Ghisallo


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 2:00 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Posts: 2478
So we're finalizing the geometry and I'm facing a dilemma...

Option 1 calls for a 983mm wheelbase with a 554mm effective top tube and a 120mm stem to get my ideal position.

Option 2 call for a 1002mm wheelbase with a 574mm effective top tube and a 110mm stem to get my ideal position.

The first would probably result in a more nimble handling bike with a slightly forward center of gravity, very similar to the Ghisallo I am riding now (975mm wheelbase, 555mm top tube, 120mm stem). This was the initial geometry proposed by the builder.

The second would be a more stable handling bike, keeping my center of gravity further behind the front wheel. This was after some revisions based on my fitting data.

So do I stick with what's familiar or go with something new based on the fitting?

_________________
TED
Schoorl, Noord-Holland, Nederland
Bike Pics
English Custom Steel Internal di2
Litespeed Ghisallo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 2:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:31 pm
Posts: 3453
Location: Surrey B.C. Canada
What is the bike going to be used for. If it is long days in the saddle then I would suggest option 2.

_________________
BIG DADDY B FLOW
AERO & LIGHT is RIGHT

Cervelo SLC 5890g/12.98 lbs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 2:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Posts: 2478
That's the direction I'm leaning toward, but I'm still uncertain. I've never ridden a bike with a wheelbase that long before. I know it's not the difference between a sport bike and a chopper, but it seems pretty dramatic. Maybe I'm the one being dramatic? hahaha

_________________
TED
Schoorl, Noord-Holland, Nederland
Bike Pics
English Custom Steel Internal di2
Litespeed Ghisallo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 7:57 am
Posts: 1049
Location: New Zealand
How does a 20mm variation in wheelbase and toptube and only 10mm in stem correction add up? Am I missing something?

Slightly OT but shouldn't these questions be asked-to and answered-by the builder? He's (probably) got more experience than you and should be able to take your description of how you want the bike to ride and turn it into reality. That's why he's paid the bigbucks.

_________________
Wheelworks.co.nz
New Zealand handbuilt wheels


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 3857
Location: Bay Area
Yah, the bb drop and the angles have to be different too to get that reach. I bet he changed at least the sta or hta and probably the rake and/or bb drop.

I don't think its going to be as dramatic unless he did that. My cross bike has the same sta, hta, and all that as my road bike, but it has a different fork rake and 25mm longer chain stays. Its not as nimble, but it takes a specific kind of turn/hill for that to matter. Lots of people I know race their cross frames in crits and do very, very well so I doubt it will stop you, as a recreational rider, from having a bike you really love. I'd go with what you know and already like.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously.
Bike
Strava


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 5:27 pm
Posts: 595
Tristan has hit it on the head.

The biomechanics of rider are paramount, and the frame geo then designed around that to achieve your preferred handling / comfort.

If your builder is proposing a 10mm discrepancy in reach I'd be dubious.

_________________
Don't be alarmed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 2:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Posts: 2478
I have been discussing it with the builder. He is great... very proactive and very responsive. I was just looking for additional input.

I wish I could post the proposed geometries but they are PDF files.

There is a 1cm change in reach between the two proposed geometries. Both share the same hta and sta. My fit numbers called for a 714mm horizontal (virtual) reach from saddle center (sit bones) to stem clamp (handlebar tops). This translated to a 720mm actual (angled) reach. My current setup has 710mm actual reach with a 120mm stem and 550mm top tube. I can't move my seat any further back to get the extra centimeter. The builder used this initial geometry for the first draft of the build plan but I asked him to work in the desired 720mm reach with a 110mm stem. I suspect the right answer is to keep the 120mm stem and get the 720mm actual reach using that instead of the 110mm stem. That gives me the appropriate reach and keeps the wheelbase shorter.

I'll try and post the two geometries for others to see. Again, I trust the builder's judgement more than my own. But I like running my ideas past people to get their opinions. You never know if I may come up some brilliant idea the builder hadn't thought of... not likely, but possible.

_________________
TED
Schoorl, Noord-Holland, Nederland
Bike Pics
English Custom Steel Internal di2
Litespeed Ghisallo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Posts: 2478
OK... I scanned the PDF files and saved them as JPEGs.

"Current" is the bike setup as determined by my bike fit. The handwritten numbers are what I was actually able to achieve with the stem, seatpost, and saddle I have on the bike. Close, but not exact.

"Version1" was the first draft the builder sent me. It was based on the 710mm actual reach on my current setup using a 120mm stem.

"Version2" incorporated my desire for the 720mm actual reach using a 110mm stem.

Looking at the pictures, it seems the 720mm reach with a 120mm stem will give me the right fight and the handling I desire.


Attachments:
version2.jpg
version2.jpg [ 157.73 KiB | Viewed 1286 times ]
version1.jpg
version1.jpg [ 149.2 KiB | Viewed 1286 times ]
current.jpg
current.jpg [ 80.5 KiB | Viewed 1286 times ]

_________________
TED
Schoorl, Noord-Holland, Nederland
Bike Pics
English Custom Steel Internal di2
Litespeed Ghisallo
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Posts: 2478
Just to be clear, I believe the initial 710mm reach was the result of the "current" geometry numbers I provided him.

_________________
TED
Schoorl, Noord-Holland, Nederland
Bike Pics
English Custom Steel Internal di2
Litespeed Ghisallo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 2:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Posts: 2478
OK, geometry is sorted... and I am happy with what the builder came up with. Still trying to decide to di2 or not di2... that is the question.

_________________
TED
Schoorl, Noord-Holland, Nederland
Bike Pics
English Custom Steel Internal di2
Litespeed Ghisallo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:31 pm
Posts: 3453
Location: Surrey B.C. Canada
Di2 and see what magic your builder can come up with. I can not wait to see a very cool internal run Di2 in steel. This is going to be GREAT!

_________________
BIG DADDY B FLOW
AERO & LIGHT is RIGHT

Cervelo SLC 5890g/12.98 lbs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:49 pm
Posts: 1581
Location: Near Horgen, Switzerland
English Cycles? I feel a convergence between your weight weenie ideals and Rob's.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:13 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 7:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 5:27 pm
Posts: 595
That's a long tt and short ht / seat height, but I guess I see why you need custom.

Di2 is fantastic. Just do it.

_________________
Don't be alarmed.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 266 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 18  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Custom Steel on the way

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

Ozrider

9

975

Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:43 am

Ozrider View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Chinese CF frame or custom steel?

in Cyclocross / Touring

dvincere

10

1145

Fri Feb 28, 2014 10:53 am

Marin View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Custom steel 'Old Faithful' build

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

SWijland

3

717

Tue Oct 14, 2014 5:42 am

jhamlin38 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Rauler custom steel frames from Italy

in Road

CippoForLife

0

1115

Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:10 pm

CippoForLife View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Custom Stainless Steel Frame Builders

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

campbellrae

23

1369

Wed May 14, 2014 3:36 pm

Stolichnaya View the latest post


It is currently Thu Oct 23, 2014 10:21 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB