Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:10 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ]  Go to page Previous 14 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7900
Location: San Francisco, CA
Did you get geometry details? Or going on faith?

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:48 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:27 pm
Posts: 540
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
faith :mrgreen:

_________________
:smartass: DO NOT RIDE AN AX-LIGHTNESS FORK :smartass:


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7900
Location: San Francisco, CA
Discoverspeed wrote:
Anybody else has actual weighs of other production Alphas?


From this post on page 3:
55 cm, 691g.

So if we assume 50 grams for paint on the larger frame relative to the smaller (the early photo was unpainted), that's a 4.2% increase in mass for a 1.8% increase in frame size, which extrapolates to 580 grams for a 51-cm frame.

As I guessed before, I suspect they're aggressively scaling weight with frame size to keep a constant stiffness, rather than allowing the small frames to be over-stiff, as is more typical.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7900
Location: San Francisco, CA
andy2 wrote:
Quote:
AX components are "lightness over everything else."

I know it's a cultural thing to have a knee jerk reaction that more of something better\stronger. But you of all people, with such a noted scienterrific mindset, dj?
Anyhow- Fact is that f.i. Ax seatposts are all rated for MTB and road, their cranks and this
particular frame have a 110kg rider limit. Other überlight offerings from the
fatherland such as the Schmolke TLO bars are actually stronger than the slightly
heavier models in their range, etc, etc.
Ax is not low weight at any cost by any means. Did you watch the LeMans 24hr race?
Those Audis have a lot of Ax carbon on board...


I'm not sure what you mean by this. The name itself, I understand, means "lightness over all". Obviously weight is the top priority with these components. I didn't say they were recklessly light, but clearly if you have more material, you can usually make something stronger and more durable.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:18 am 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 9:33 pm
Posts: 713
Location: Luxembourg / Sweden
Mass + Speed = Energy
In practice lighter is often stronger with moving objects such as bikes.
Quality of manufacturing and engineering, care and skill
in the application of sound material knowledge, higher quality materials etc, etc...
-will always factor more than sheer quantity.

Re the name- 'ax' is for Axel Schnura.

_________________
rolobikes


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7900
Location: San Francisco, CA
"Today's stage is over the pave. I'd better tell the mechanic to mount the AX-Lightness gear...."

Could happen, I suppose.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:47 pm
Posts: 3553
Location: Pittsburgh
I totally have the AX bug...I'm loading up on components. The frame looks nice but it's coming out a little too late for me.

_________________
RUEGAMER 5.21kg, 11.48lbs

CRUMPTON 4.40kg, 9.70lbs


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:51 pm
Posts: 3
Will be interesting to see it perform against the new Storck 0.6, which has internal Di2 cable routing.
(Weight I think is going to be around 620g)

(spoke to the guys at Poshbikes recently, he's just made a wallet busting bike which came out at a final weight of 3.75 kg)


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:49 am
Posts: 1447
Location: Europe
The Fascenario 0.6 also has integrated brakes! Looks quite cool, I think... :D


Attachments:
Fascenario 0.6.jpg
Fascenario 0.6.jpg [ 149.26 KiB | Viewed 2194 times ]
Fascenario 0.6 rear brakes.jpg
Fascenario 0.6 rear brakes.jpg [ 153.53 KiB | Viewed 2194 times ]

_________________
“I always find it amazing that a material can actually sell a product when it’s really the engineering that creates and dictates how well that material will behave or perform.” — Chuck Teixeira

RideWert.com
Wert Cycling on Facebook
Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:47 pm
Posts: 3553
Location: Pittsburgh
looks like it'd be a pain in the ass to change the pads

_________________
RUEGAMER 5.21kg, 11.48lbs

CRUMPTON 4.40kg, 9.70lbs


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7900
Location: San Francisco, CA
mythical wrote:
The Fascenario 0.6 also has integrated brakes! Looks quite cool, I think... :D


Fat seatstays: so 2005. Will never sell.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Last edited by djconnel on Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 9:11 pm
Posts: 856
Location: SC, USA
mythical wrote:
The Fascenario 0.6 also has integrated brakes! Looks quite cool, I think... :D


In my dreams I might take the Fascenario 0.6 over the AX frame. They need to fix fork break to the same mechanism as the back and loose that silly cable coming out the side of the fork. I'm sure there is a way to route the cable down the inside of the fork.

The AX frame a big achievment for AX, and if priced below Cervelo's R5 is might be a winner.

_________________
:-) Toys-R-Us


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:49 am
Posts: 2182
Location: Denmark
mythical wrote:
The Fascenario 0.6 also has integrated brakes! Looks quite cool, I think... :D


Will have mine in August. :-)

The brakepads are in fact quite easy to change. The fat stays are cool IMO and not just copycatting design from others. If designed correctly, the comfort will be just as good as frames with pencil thin stays. There's a bit more to it than that...
Storck will come out with a new frame next year that has a lot more compliance than a Roubaix SL2, and that frame has "normal" size stays.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 1:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:49 am
Posts: 1447
Location: Europe
Back on topic:

Image

_________________
“I always find it amazing that a material can actually sell a product when it’s really the engineering that creates and dictates how well that material will behave or perform.” — Chuck Teixeira

RideWert.com
Wert Cycling on Facebook


Top
   
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 1:40 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 1:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:47 pm
Posts: 3553
Location: Pittsburgh
I hate the green... love the frame though

_________________
RUEGAMER 5.21kg, 11.48lbs

CRUMPTON 4.40kg, 9.70lbs


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ]  Go to page Previous 14 5 6 7 8 9 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. ax-lightness VIAL Evo D Vs lightweight urgestalt

in Road

AJ1980

7

744

Thu Sep 15, 2016 4:31 pm

badger4561 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. AX Lightness Vial Evo seat post clamp

in Road

kode54

9

1187

Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:40 am

cfred84 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Anyone running an Edge 1.0 fork with AX Lightness brakes? Clearance for 25 tires?

in Road

jz4nyc

5

288

Fri Jul 15, 2016 1:29 am

jz4nyc View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Frame questions + best frame you ever rode

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 5 ]

in Road

iliedanila

69

8035

Sun Jul 17, 2016 5:01 pm

jerrybrabus View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Question to the aero gurus - "non aero" frame vs Cervelo S5 frame / fork / seatpost

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 5 ]

in Road

mbrider

61

3270

Tue Sep 27, 2016 3:45 pm

fa63 View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BRM, caballero, cyclespeed, Exabot [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], kgt, MSNbot Media, nickf, Ritxis, RM27, Yahoo [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited