Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:40 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Cervelo R3 v Rivals
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:16 pm
Posts: 56
Location: southampton, UK
i want to start doing some sportives and want a bike that will be comfortable for 6 - 8 hours in the saddle yet efficient and responsive to make the most of my 'limited natural resources'

I like the look of the Cervelo R3 which according to the blurb is meant to be very comfy but i don't know if thats just comfy for a super stiff race frame or comfortable full stop.

unfortunately i can't find any reviews and wondered if any of you out there had any personal experience.

also i'd be grateful for any suggestions on other frames/bikes that would fit the bill.

many thanks

_________________
mikey


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:22 am
Posts: 3657
Location: Leg hurty
Buy a C50, no looking back after that! :wink:


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:47 pm
Posts: 3553
Location: Pittsburgh
I don't think Cervelos are known for their comfy rides. I'd 2nd the C50 for someone looking for comfort


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:27 pm 
Offline
Resident Pro

Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2003 9:42 pm
Posts: 2256
the r3 is extremely comfortable. never ridden a c50, but have ridden colnago carbon bike before. you can ride an r3 all day and no problem with comfort. same with a colnago carbon bike. but in terms of weight, go with the r3, you will save almost a pound compared to a colnago carbon. if you want something that screams luxury bike, go with colnago carbon. the r3 is like a porsche but can still absorb the shocks well, the colnago is like a rolls royce or a bentley that is comfortable but also has 500 horsepower when needed.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 6:55 pm
Posts: 2350
Location: Vienna, AUT
Kuota Khan. You will not be disappointed.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 4:57 am
Posts: 202
My R3 is more comfortable than the Vitus 979 (small diameter aluminum) and Airborne Zeppelin (ti) frames I have. My PedalForce QS2 is a little more comfortable mostly because the Specialized Pave post I put on has some give to it. But the difference in comfort is pretty small. The carbon frames mute some of the high frequency vibration from rough pavement but without suspension you still feel the bumps. No frame material or fancy constructoin (short of a SoftRide beam bike) will change that. I have done 100 mile+ rides on all of those bikes and have been fine. The R3 does have a shortish head tube so it may not work out for you if you want to run your bars higher than racer normal, for long ride comfort.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:26 pm
Posts: 2529
Before you believe the reports that the R3 is comfortable, you should post your weight and the size of frame you might ride.

I rode a 51cm and found it to be quite rough riding with my 135 lbs on it. A heavier rider on a larger frame might not find it as bad. Tires wheels and saddle also make a difference. I used the same tires, wheels and saddle I'd been using for the previous couple of years.

The quality of construction of the R3 does not justify the $2800 MSRP, IMO. I was not impressed at all. There are better frames out there, like the LOOK 585.


Last edited by DaveS on Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 125
I would certainly recommend the R3, and maybe the SL if money is no object.
Its a really light and responsive frame. If you did a search, there are a lot lot lot of reviews and beautiful R3's from the previous year or so..

The only problem for me was how harsh a ride it was in the initial weeks but am used to it now.
I also dont recommend it if you intend to race or travel a lot with the frame as Im not convinced its durable enough with knocks and hits.
In this scenario, the C50 would not be a problem (or rather less of a worry).

I dont race nor travel to races (fly, etc), so would thoroughly recommend the R3. Just make sure you put on a set of stiff wheels to feel the full responsive potential of the frame (32 spoked build?)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 4:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:42 am
Posts: 940
Location: Calgary
I have not ridden the R, although my son had the predecessor R2.5 until it broke and he loved everything about it, but not about the SOloist carbon that replaced it.

This comment is more towards those who've recommended the C50. It is a really nice bike. Mine is a 2005 frame with the HP stays and I wish I had bought the slightly less stiff Extreme C. I find the C50 feels rough over bumps and poor pavement. On the other hand, I can ride it 150 km and not feel beaten up at the end and it climbs better than my first generation (1995) C40 did.

A couple of months ago, I bought a Parlee Z1 and it does everything the C50 does in terms of performance, but with a smoother ride. Chek it out too if you can scrape up the $.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 5:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:56 am
Posts: 770
Location: San Francisco, CA
I love the ride of the R3. However, I own a Tarmac SL and can ride it for 6-8 hours with no complaints. The R3 is awesomely stiff and I am dying for the SL version to finally become availible.

_________________
2011 Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL3 (If the insurance allows)
2010 Specialized Tarmac Pro
2008 Custom Columbus XLR8R Frame (Team Branded)
2006 Specialized S-Works E5 Aerotec - Stolen
1995 Pinarello Stelvio (Fixed Gear)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 7:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 7:41 am
Posts: 130
R3 is a great bike. I have one now and have had several Roubaixs by Specialized. I own the Sworks currently.

For longer training rides I almost always use a Roubaix. Both the bikes are set up very close in the cockpit. Slightly more drop on the R3 but only a few cm.

For me the R3 is a better going down hill and climbing standing. The frame more comfortable on the Roubaiux and better for climbing seated.

I was out for a century today..the first this spring. One of my thoughts was I would really like to have last year's Roubaix Pro frame (even more comfortable than the S works) back for long rides early in the season. That frame can be had for well under $1000 on ebay. I'm 6'1" and go up or down 5# from 180#.

I wrote a short comparison of the two frames here last fall. My opinions still stand although I spent so much time getting the fit sorted on the R3 it is my ride of "choice" now. But since I do have a choice just nothing over 4 or 5 hrs thanks.

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 04&start=0


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 7:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 10:15 am
Posts: 1159
Im 70kg and last year I raced the 'Maratona dles Dolomites' and the 'Marmotte' on an R3 with neutron clincher wheels. For me it's definitively a very comfortable bike, excellent rear shock absortion.
I just recomended it to a friend who was looking for a frame for long distance rides.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 9:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2003 4:35 pm
Posts: 465
Location: The Netherlands
Cannondale Synapse Carbon?

It's specially designed to be comfortable!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 10:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 11:01 am
Posts: 82
lol


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:16 pm
Posts: 56
Location: southampton, UK
thanks every one, it sounds on the whole like it's definately worth arranging a test ride.

_________________
mikey


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cervelo S2 2016 and Di2

in Road

Ste_S

14

1289

Sat Mar 05, 2016 9:56 pm

wingguy View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Pinarello F8 & Cervelo R5

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

MrRouleur

37

5628

Sun Dec 13, 2015 3:53 am

stanseven View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cervelo S5 with Campagnolo EPS V1

in Road

nismosr

0

467

Mon Oct 26, 2015 2:16 pm

nismosr View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Best BB for Cervelo R5 (24mm)

in Road

clipsed

14

838

Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:10 pm

DavidMLee View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2012 Cervelo S5

in Road

hubert222

3

670

Fri Jan 15, 2016 2:09 am

garlet View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Madone69, shk1, Super_fast and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited