HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:09 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:34 pm
Posts: 527
Location: Insjön, SWEDEN
I have cleaned and removed paint on ny XTR cranks, theýre hollow right?

Wondering about shave them in the backside.

Weighing at 408 gr without spindle, lockring.


Attachments:
XTR95untuned.jpg
XTR95untuned.jpg [ 96.57 KiB | Viewed 1697 times ]

_________________
Experimental Prototype
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:29 am 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:34 pm
Posts: 527
Location: Insjön, SWEDEN
I just milled off the backside of a non drive crank.
Uneven thickness in the hollowgram forging process made it a unsafe experience to mill it off.

The arms are down to 396 gram from 408 now but I think it will not be worth it?
I milled away only one arm, so I may shoot to 380 gr but durability will be a issue.

I will test them in a fairly safe environment first.

_________________
Experimental Prototype


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:29 am 


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 170
Location: North Hills, CA.
Hi Mattias,

Are you sure those are hollow? They look lightyears away from my XT Hollowtechs. Your XTR arms look too squared off me.

Look for a seam at the pedal end, and inside the threaded hole too. Were there any depressions on the area that you milled?

I like the idea of shaveing the hollowtechs. More material could be removed from around the pedal I think.

Terry

_________________
Down there? DOWN THERE???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:58 pm
Posts: 181
Location: Newcastle, UK
shovelon - these XTR's were the first ones they made hollow [xt at the time were still solid], they were made from a U shaped piece with a plate welded on the back then machined, so you wont find an seams or anything. Also the thickness should be reasonably even id have thought.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 403
Location: Debrecen, Hungary
shovelon wrote:
Are you sure those are hollow? They look lightyears away from my XT Hollowtechs. Your XTR arms look too squared off me.

One of the best cranks made ever! And use the Hollowtech technology.
http://www.fa-technik.adfc.de/Herstelle ... M952-4.jpg
http://kobu-mtb.no-blog.jp/photos/uncat ... nk_01s.jpg

_________________
MORATI COMPONENTS WANTED! - MORATI ON FACEBOOK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 676
Location: Belgium
those polished ones are pimpin

_________________
Scott CR1 6.67 kg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:33 pm
Posts: 218
Honestly I prefer the "normal" version to the polished one. But I agree that the 952 crankset is one of the best ever made!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:00 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:34 pm
Posts: 527
Location: Insjön, SWEDEN
How stiff is these crank?
I milled away a lot as you can see here.


Attachments:
milledXTR95X.jpg
milledXTR95X.jpg [ 97.52 KiB | Viewed 1721 times ]

_________________
Experimental Prototype
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 1:38 pm
Posts: 78
Location: uk, birmingham
Those cranks were ran by all of the dh pro's at the time along with xc racers so i expect there pretty stiff and strong.

What bb do they run, octalink or splined?

Is there such thing as a light octalink bb if they do indeed use this fitment?

Rick


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 403
Location: Debrecen, Hungary
Mattias Hellöre wrote:
How stiff is these crank?
I milled away a lot as you can see here.

With this process you made a huge mistake!

_________________
MORATI COMPONENTS WANTED! - MORATI ON FACEBOOK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:35 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:34 pm
Posts: 527
Location: Insjön, SWEDEN
enté wrote:
Mattias Hellöre wrote:
How stiff is these crank?
I milled away a lot as you can see here.

With this process you made a huge mistake!


Mistake?
Give me constructive critics or you are like Gunkillah.

_________________
Experimental Prototype


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 6:19 am
Posts: 565
Location: nr Derby, UK
Rickhughes wrote:
Those cranks were ran by all of the dh pro's at the time along with xc racers so i expect there pretty stiff and strong.

What bb do they run, octalink or splined?

Is there such thing as a light octalink bb if they do indeed use this fitment?

Rick


they run the "original" octalink with the short splines (not the later version with long splines), as used on the road cranksets. I use mine with a Dura Ace BB which weighs ~150g...only problem for some people is the short spindle might cause interference between chainrings and chainstays on some frames


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 6:56 pm
Posts: 1280
Location: Worcester, UK
Mattias Hellöre wrote:
enté wrote:
Mattias Hellöre wrote:
How stiff is these crank?
I milled away a lot as you can see here.

With this process you made a huge mistake!


Mistake?
Give me constructive critics or you are like Gunkillah.


If you want more details, then they are now no longer hollowtech, and are a huge amount less stiff and strong than they were, and by far larger a proportion than the amount of weight you saved. the whole point of those cranks was to have a tubular section, and you now no longer have that!

_________________
No scales on the trails


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 5:53 am
Posts: 476
ridley86 wrote:
those polished ones are pimpin


I sanded off the original finish on mine, gave them a nice fine brushed finish, and anodized them black. Doesn't look bad either. Quite some work for a bike build that is currently on the backburner.

_________________
blogging at 29in.ch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:33 pm
Posts: 218
Oh come on man, what have you done to those beautiful cranks?!?!

First of all, as chrism wrote, you've reduced the stiffness quite a lot. Weight saving is good, but not when it affects the stiffness as much as in this case. Second of all, how much weight have you actually saved? Was it worth it?

Anyhow, it's too late now, so at least finish it of nicely by sanding the rough edges so that it looks nice!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:50 am 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. New S-Works cranks

in Road

teufelhunden222

10

2755

Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:31 pm

teufelhunden222 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Deciding on Cranks

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

drainyoo

23

1562

Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:31 pm

drainyoo View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 180mm cranks

in Road

Phill P

6

417

Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:55 am

Causidicus View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 160mm cranks for TT?

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

jockster

17

1743

Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:22 pm

gregalfa View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. '14 s-works 172 cranks

in For sale - Pictures are mandatory 22-3-13

dmoneysworks

0

207

Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:58 am

dmoneysworks View the latest post


It is currently Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:09 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB