What's the consensus on carbon clinchers, seriously?

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

MalibuCANE
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:18 am

by MalibuCANE

I was afraid of riding carbon clinchers because of failures but when I bought my 2014 Trek Madone 7.9 I opted for the Bontrager D5 cc since I was assured they were better than the older versions. I put 25mm tires on them and really loved them.

I live on the west side of LA and spend a lot of time in the local mountains. I am a very good descender and don't hit the brakes excessively. A few weeks ago, after months with no issue, I had a double carbon clincher fail on a warm day. The front just popped on a descent but I luckily recovered before I crashed. The rear had a slow leak so that may just have been a coincidence. My tire pressure was only around 100 and the rims were so hot to the touch I couldn't believe it.

I'll never ride carbon clinchers in the mountains again until disc brakes become cool. On the flats or rollers I would never worry. I miss the looks but it's not worth risking my life.

I don't race anymore but when I did I raced Zipp 404 tubulars and I nothing I have tried compares to the feel of light aero tubular wheels in my experience.

eric
Posts: 2196
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
Contact:

by eric

What descent were you going down? Which brake pads were you using?

I've always used aluminium wheels down there when descending roads like Yerba Buena and Deer Creek. I also use aluminium rims up here in the santa cruz mountains as we have some very steep and technical descents.

But I've been ok with carbon clinchers everywhere else including the big climbs in the sierras and the steepest and most technical descent that we race down in NorCal.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



User avatar
beatnik
Posts: 1237
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:38 pm

by beatnik

Ride best pads, SS black prince or shimano C3s , brake with both brakes at time shortly and more frequently , and inflate about 110 psi and dont use them at mountains or in hot days. That's best you can do. When you are not sure ride you ALU set . In the positive side they are aero, lighter, posh and comfier. I love them but not for everything. Don't waste money in Envés or Zipps, Farsports and LVWA Amazon and others make good ones for about 500 600 $ and good enough
Biomechanical spreadsheet. Sizing&Fitting.

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 8e319d185b

spdntrxi
Posts: 5790
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:11 pm

by spdntrxi

I have Enve 3.4s... just finished Levi's Gran Fondo... some major wrecks happened and the worst was on the first major descent after King Ridge .. witnessed a lot of people with flats on the side of the road on that descent. Kinda worried me and I actually stopped twice ..1, my hands were tired from braking and I wanted to see how hot my rims were. Yes they were pretty toasty but not burn me hot.

I never gave my Enve's a second thought going down Calaveras or Mt Diablo.( typical <10% grades). but Kings Ridge was something else.. it was HOT .. the road is in crappy condition and it is steep.
2024 BMC TeamMachine R Building
2018 BMC TImeMachine Road
2002 Moots Compact-SL- getting aero look makeover
2019 Parlee Z0XD - "classified"
2023 Pivot E-Vault - completed project, full Xplr package

Alex_ucsb
Shop Owner
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:31 am

by Alex_ucsb

Generally, it's only the big US brands that have the heat thing really figured out; I'd have no compunction in this day and age riding down the nastiest descents on a new set of Enve/Zipp/Reynolds wheels, but my experience hasn't borne out the same confidence in cheaper brands.

davidalone
Posts: 622
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:27 pm

by davidalone

according to HED's tsting, it's not the rim thats a problem.. it's the tubes and tyres inside them. read more about it here:


http://www.slowtwitch.com/Tech/A_tour_o ... _4001.html

fallzboater
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:26 am

by fallzboater

beatnik wrote:Ride best pads, SS black prince or shimano C3s , brake with both brakes at time shortly and more frequently , and inflate about 110 psi and dont use them at mountains or in hot days. That's best you can do. When you are not sure ride you ALU set . In the positive side they are aero, lighter, posh and comfier. I love them but not for everything. Don't waste money in Envés or Zipps, Farsports and LVWA Amazon and others make good ones for about 500 600 $ and good enough


I don't find any other hits when searching WW for LVWA, what's the story with them? There are very few reviews of any of their products on Amazon. I'm specifically interested in wide 35-40mm clinchers. I prefer to build my own, but some of these complete wheelsets are two cheap to ignore. Amazon is a plus for me.

User avatar
beatnik
Posts: 1237
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:38 pm

by beatnik

I have 38s C3 with scandium inside to solve heating problem, bassalt surface T700 U shaped rim and novatec- sapim 24 2x both sides rear and are great. No dif. in braking performance with my K-Es almost same weight and stiffer but more aero. I am glad with them . But i've done only 1000 km. I bought a second 50 pair for my daddy, but C1 with red decals and V shaped same hubs and lacing pattern but worst rim imho.
Biomechanical spreadsheet. Sizing&Fitting.

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 8e319d185b

User avatar
beatnik
Posts: 1237
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:38 pm

by beatnik

davidalone wrote:according to HED's tsting, it's not the rim thats a problem.. it's the tubes and tyres inside them. read more about it here:


http://www.slowtwitch.com/Tech/A_tour_o ... _4001.html

Kind of designers are scary more even than their wheels
Failure is because rim opens due to the heat and the pressure, both things make the rim flex out till the fiber breaks. Resin overheating is bad but not the worst. I'm civil engineer.
Biomechanical spreadsheet. Sizing&Fitting.

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 8e319d185b

Greg66
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:06 pm

by Greg66

I'll throw in my data point.

I like - liked - the idea of carbon clinchers. I've got a pair of Strikes and had a pairs of Assaults. I've ridden the Assaults at IMC and a Strike(R)/Assault(F) combo at Mallorca 70.3. I've ridden them elsewhere too - for a whole in the summer I commuted on the Assaults just for the hell of it. I've been satisfied with their performance.

Three weeks ago I was riding the Assaults in the Yorkshire Dales. I came to a descent - maybe 3 miles - which was twisty and steep (quite a lot of 16% and above on my Joule - I was glad of our route). I was stuck behind a car and couldn't get round due to the twisties and short straights between the bends. I had to ride the brakes a lot more than I would normally.

Bottom line: I should have stopped at the top, let the car go, then ride a clear road. Because by the time I was at the bottom I'd popped a bulge on the front rim. I took some air out of the tyre and rode very carefully back to base. But the wheel was dead.

So now I use it to stretch tubulars.

I've still got the Strikes - for now. I really want to like carbon clinchers, but this has made me realise that they - or perhaps just the low end models - are not yet sufficiently matured as a technology for genuine everyday all condition use.

If I had blown an Enve, or a Zipp, or a Reynolds Aero, I'd be seriously pissed off.


ETA: 80kg, Reynolds blue cryo pads.

kulivontot
Posts: 1163
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm

by kulivontot

How old were your rims Greg?

Greg66
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:06 pm

by Greg66

kulivontot wrote:How old were your rims Greg?



Two years (to the day!) from purchase date. Bought new and boxed but from eBay so no warranty. I was prepared to take that risk when I bought them, but hey ho.

More than 1000 but less than 2000 miles since I've had them. 2012 model with this decal set

Image

To be fair, Reynolds were very good and offered me a deeply discounted crash replacement option despite me having no receipt and being out of warranty. But the economics just didn't stack up - I didn't want to keep them, and I wouldn't get the repair cost of one wheel back if I sold the pair. So I wrote the front off, sold the rear with its aerojacket, and went for some tubs instead.

Now I'm waiting for a dry spell so I can try them out...

User avatar
beatnik
Posts: 1237
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:38 pm

by beatnik

New Mavic C40 solve the heat issue, but are expensive. Imho clinchers are now safe for right use. But not for everything . Prada Shoes are not made to play soccer. Tubulars are not for every day, except if you want to come back home by taxi. If you are scared just buy zipp 60 or cosmic with ALU braking surface. And you don't climb with them for another reason ;) . Finally we have to choose.
Biomechanical spreadsheet. Sizing&Fitting.

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 8e319d185b

bm0p700f
in the industry
Posts: 5777
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
Contact:

by bm0p700f

My view is any braking that gets a alloy rim too hot to touch should be avoided with carbon clinchers, no matter the brand. The mavic C40 is not a full carbon clincher that how they have solved it.

Tubular can be for everyday. Buidling a set of tubulars wheels which I intend to run though winter.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



User avatar
beatnik
Posts: 1237
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:38 pm

by beatnik

Ok so don't buy them. I'll buy another set while this thread becomes huge. Perhaps alu veloplugs with wider and longer border touching the rim are good idea to disipate heat. :noidea: in the meantime. Cheap and ingenious.
Last edited by beatnik on Wed Oct 08, 2014 8:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Biomechanical spreadsheet. Sizing&Fitting.

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 8e319d185b

Post Reply