Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:59 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: TT fit for Scott Foil
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:50 pm
Posts: 453
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Hello all,
I am planning on buying a Scott Foil 15 as my #1 road bike. I'd like to use the Foil as both a road and a TT bike by mounting aerobars(not clip-ons) and setting the saddle further forward. Is this doable?
I can imagine the handling will be awkward as the front wheel will carry more weight than usual.
Any comments welcome.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
SHUT UP LEGS
2015 Giant Propel Advanced
2013 KTM Strada mod. GOT IT BACK!
2011 Pinarello Dogma 60.1(loaner)
2011 Scott SUB 45(sold)
ITU Aeronautical Eng.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 1045
Location: Sweden
What size are you looking at? The larger sizes not that suitabale for TT fit but the smaller ones are, more than most road bikes both for HTA and STA. In fact they are more TT than road bike geo...

Image

This is a 2011 geochart so it might not be accurate. Look at the S and M, they are almost same reach but the S is much better suited for a TT fit, so if you're in that size range or smaller, the Foil may suit your wishes very well. Extremely slack HTA's in the small sizes too, so steering won't be poor with TT bars (but will be with road bars IMO).

_________________

The Shivenge


Top
   
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 6:48 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:50 pm
Posts: 453
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Thanks, yeah I forgot to mention my size. I'm looking at size M, that one is the closest to my current bike.Image
This is supposed to be 2013, I think the geos are the same.
If (for example) 77 degrees is my optimal TT STA, I would need to set the saddle forward by 37 mm. I don't know if a saddle can offer that much adjustment, my current one doesn't.
If the Foil were using a round or flippable seatpost, flipping a setback SP would solve the problem.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
SHUT UP LEGS
2015 Giant Propel Advanced
2013 KTM Strada mod. GOT IT BACK!
2011 Pinarello Dogma 60.1(loaner)
2011 Scott SUB 45(sold)
ITU Aeronautical Eng.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 1045
Location: Sweden
My point exactly that the S is only 1mm shorter in reach, but with a steeper STA so you would get the same reach as the M but your seat further forward with no tradeoffs. Well except for a lower stack height but the Foil has a pretty tall head tube in a S too if we are talking about a TT fit per se.

Ofcourse I don't know your current bikes fit, but the S seems like the obvious choice over the M as its the same fit, just a steeper STA.

I.e, the Foil doesn't scale down proportionately.

_________________

The Shivenge


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:43 pm
Posts: 2367
efeballi wrote:
If the Foil were using a round or flippable seatpost, flipping a setback SP would solve the problem.


You can get an inline post for it.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 1:38 pm
Posts: 691
Location: Greater Pittsburgh
You're much better off keeping it as a road bike and add shortie aerobars for TT's. No need to mock with the fit and toss the balance of the bike off.

_________________
"Suddenly the thought struck me; my floor is someone elses ceiling" - Nils Ferlin


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 1045
Location: Sweden
I don't know the fork rake, but assuming ~43mm on all sizes, I dont think the smaller sizes would have the handling impaired by a TT bar, rather the opposite... But as the OP doesn't have a slightest clue as to STA nor reach for his/her own TT fit, this all seems a bit futile...

_________________

The Shivenge


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 12:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:50 pm
Posts: 453
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
@audiojan really? I thought of that, but will it perform close to a full-on TT bike?
DMF, the talk went a little OT. What I'm wondering is the feasibility of swapping the bike between TT mode and road mode. That is one of the reasons I'm looking at Ultegra Di2(hence Foil 15), I won't have to do gear cable routing/tuning every time.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
SHUT UP LEGS
2015 Giant Propel Advanced
2013 KTM Strada mod. GOT IT BACK!
2011 Pinarello Dogma 60.1(loaner)
2011 Scott SUB 45(sold)
ITU Aeronautical Eng.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 1:38 pm
Posts: 691
Location: Greater Pittsburgh
efeballi wrote:
@audiojan really? I thought of that, but will it perform close to a full-on TT bike?
DMF, the talk went a little OT. What I'm wondering is the feasibility of swapping the bike between TT mode and road mode. That is one of the reasons I'm looking at Ultegra Di2(hence Foil 15), I won't have to do gear cable routing/tuning every time.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Yes, road bike are not designed to have a forward weight distribution, but rather a rearward of center. Keeping the weight balance and still gaining most of the advantages of a tt position means using clip on bars that moves the pads further back and has the shorter reach needed to keep the standard road position. BTW, Ui2 works great for exactly these set ups.

_________________
"Suddenly the thought struck me; my floor is someone elses ceiling" - Nils Ferlin


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 7:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 1045
Location: Sweden
Audiojan, you're making a generalisation that doesn't fully apply to the smaller sized Foils.

Efeballi, weather it is feasible or not for you, depends very much where on the spectrum of STA's you are for both a TT and road fit. If you are at the 78 degree end of the STA for a TT fit then no. If you are at the 75-76 degree end then this could likely be made to work very well. But ofcourse it also depends on your reach requirements.

In short, the Foil is in a few of the sizes a suitable object for this idea, in other sizes it is not due to handling issues. But if it suitable for YOU is another question, nobody could possibility answer that without knowing atleast a little about your fit numbers.

_________________

The Shivenge


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 1:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 1:38 pm
Posts: 691
Location: Greater Pittsburgh
Are you sure about that? It's not as simple as STA or HTA… look at front-center measurement to get a better idea of designed balance.

Admitting that I have only been on a medium Foil and never on a XXS or XS, but if that's an indication, I don't think I would like to have a forward biased weight distribution. The Foil is not a very slow handling bike and my gut feeling tells me that it would not be the most stable if I through off the balance. I would still recommend using shortie clip on's to maintain the rearward balance...

_________________
"Suddenly the thought struck me; my floor is someone elses ceiling" - Nils Ferlin


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 1045
Location: Sweden
Look at the HTA of the smaller sizes, very slack, very much slack TT angles which should yield a more composed steering with TT bars (and unbearably slow steering with drop bars). The M Foil seems like a different beast here. Ofcourse rake angles will play a part and for all I know the smaller sizes may have a different fork that offsets the slack HTA.

As for center to front, I assume you mean reach, that is very much up to the riders personal preference less than how it actually imposes on handling. But you don't buy a frame basing the reach on preferred handling. And as I said, the M and the S are near identical for reach. This is in most cases well within reason for adjusting the last 20mm with choice of stem, pad position and so forth.

_________________

The Shivenge


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:09 pm
Posts: 919
The only Foil that would have any chance of being used for a better TT setup, but still be used as a road bike is the 52cm/49cm.

I sold my 56cm because it was too large, and I ran a no-offset post. I switched to a 54cm, and really, there isn't too much difference between the 54-56cm in reality.

The only frame then would be a drop down to a 52cm, where the HT/angles are different that would lend itself to a more aggressive setup forward/aero.

Matt Goss supposedly rides a 52cm Foil, he is listed at 5'10". That is a road setup. He slams the stem, runs a 130mm stem. Personally, I'm 5'10.5" and run a 110mm stem with -10 and zero offset seatpost....that is my road setup. I don't do TTs. But if I had imagined myself needing something more TT, then the 52cm is the only frame that would lend itself to that, but wheelbase, positioning..who knows how that would play out in reality trying to do two jobs of Road/TT.

You could use the Foil, but you need to lean towards a good road setup, and compromise on the TT part, and not the other way around if that is your plan. The only way to get a real TT setup, is run a dedicated TT frame.

I would say only the BMC TMR, maybe the new Felt, S5 would lend themselves better to TTs setups with the flip seatpost that are somewhat designed to give you that steeper seat angle and more forward to TT positioning.

I don't think Scott ever had intentions of making this a dual purpose frame. They want you to buy a Plasma for that.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 7:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:50 pm
Posts: 453
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Zigmeister wrote:
The only Foil that would have any chance of being used for a better TT setup, but still be used as a road bike is the 52cm/49cm.

I sold my 56cm because it was too large, and I ran a no-offset post. I switched to a 54cm, and really, there isn't too much difference between the 54-56cm in reality.

The only frame then would be a drop down to a 52cm, where the HT/angles are different that would lend itself to a more aggressive setup forward/aero.

Matt Goss supposedly rides a 52cm Foil, he is listed at 5'10". That is a road setup. He slams the stem, runs a 130mm stem. Personally, I'm 5'10.5" and run a 110mm stem with -10 and zero offset seatpost....that is my road setup. I don't do TTs. But if I had imagined myself needing something more TT, then the 52cm is the only frame that would lend itself to that, but wheelbase, positioning..who knows how that would play out in reality trying to do two jobs of Road/TT.

You could use the Foil, but you need to lean towards a good road setup, and compromise on the TT part, and not the other way around if that is your plan. The only way to get a real TT setup, is run a dedicated TT frame.

I would say only the BMC TMR, maybe the new Felt, S5 would lend themselves better to TTs setups with the flip seatpost that are somewhat designed to give you that steeper seat angle and more forward to TT positioning.

I don't think Scott ever had intentions of making this a dual purpose frame. They want you to buy a Plasma for that.


Of course not, not after pouring all that money for R&D.

I looked at the TMR but the price is quite close to the Foil and Plasma combined, all having Ui2.

The 52 cm will have too much drop for me, 54 looks better in terms of fit. Spacers on 52? I don't know, I may be stoned to death for that.

All in all, I'm more inclined to the 54, as the bike will be doing %95 road riding and %5 TT's.

The dual-purpose bike project is moving further and further away...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
SHUT UP LEGS
2015 Giant Propel Advanced
2013 KTM Strada mod. GOT IT BACK!
2011 Pinarello Dogma 60.1(loaner)
2011 Scott SUB 45(sold)
ITU Aeronautical Eng.


Top
   
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 7:53 pm 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. scott foil xxl

in Road

marmot

1

408

Wed Nov 09, 2016 8:19 pm

marmot View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. What BB for quarq 975 and Scott Foil

in Road

mrowkoob

0

237

Sat Jun 25, 2016 7:50 am

mrowkoob View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Thoughts on the 2016 Scott foil

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

Jakehaslam

15

1719

Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:10 pm

wheelsONfire View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cipollini Nk1k or Scott Foil 2016 HMX

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 ]

in Road

REDUTOPIA

52

4412

Tue Mar 08, 2016 9:58 pm

REDUTOPIA View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Change my Scott Foil 10 to Giant Propel Advanced SL1 ?

in Road

bleko

4

649

Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:08 am

davetung View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], chris47, Google [Bot], GothicCastle, MSNbot Media, oldnslow2, sethjkay, topflightpro and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited