Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Mon Dec 05, 2016 5:52 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 8:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:42 am
Posts: 27
Location: Russia
Please help with new frame choice.
I already have Colnago EPS 61 traditional geometry during last 2 season.
It's a super bike, but with my 6'2'', is awfully not aero)))
Compare to my previous GIANT TCR Advanced ISP , old , 2007 year model.
Colnago about 1 km/h is slower at same power, course etc.
I don't want to use two bikes for trips on races since it is expensive in transportation in the avia plane.
I sold my Cervelo P3C, it is clear that it isn't comparable with a usual road bike, but Colnago with clip-on aerobar is awfully slow. It with comfort, but is senseless to participation in a TT races. As far as Scott Foil will meet my expectations, it is also possible it it will be slightly easier than Colnago (1250+360 gramm at 61s size).
I hope to hear of real responses of owners of Scott Foil, I consider 58 size.
Or I should continuing to enjoy Colnago, possibly it is my conjectures.
Cervelo was awful for bad pavings road, I couldn't give out on it the maximum power. It was uncomfortable and very rigid, ideal for glass road (not around).
I considered S5, but it is the same pain as it seems to me. If Scott same "a piece of plywood", it not option for me
Sorry for my poor english
Regards.


Last edited by camber66 on Mon Dec 01, 2014 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 7:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 4:24 am
Posts: 227
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Hi! It sounds to me like your two main criteria are comfort and aerodynamics. I have test ridden a scott foil, and while I have no basis to judge it's aerodynamics, it didn't feel any faster than my aluminum bike, but was definitely a lot more harsh (and I ride gatorskins at 120 psi most of the time, so it wasn't wheels/ tires).

I haven't ridden the S5, but from what I hear, it won't be as stiff bit definitely is one of the most comfortable aero road bikes. If it was me though, unless you're set on doing TT's in long distance travel races, I would just stick with the colnago. It sounds like a gorgeous bike, and it would be a shame to have to sell it. Whatever you chose, good luck at the races!


Top
   
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 7:06 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:53 pm
Posts: 96
I had a foil 61cm...and I sold it pretty quickly. It was hard, stiff and harsh.

I miss have a Trek madone 7.9. Great bike. Much more comfortable, and handles differently to the foil. Possibly not as well on the front end, but that would be hard to prove.

I can't comment on the cervelo. All tunnel tests suggest that it is more aero than the Scott or the Trek.

Also, consider the 58 rather than the 61 of you can make it work fit-wise.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 4:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:42 am
Posts: 27
Location: Russia
Ok, thanks for responses. I will continue to racing on Colnago EPS. 61S a little big for me.
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 3726
Whew! By the way, from the pic it doesn't really look like your bike is too big but that's totally your call. Not sure why someone would suggest you get a 58 unless they had way more information about you than could be found in this thread, before the pic even. And when referring to its size it should be referred to as a 61, or 61 traditional. At first I thought your added "s" behind the 61 was just a typo but you did it again. The "s" indicates sloping which yours is clearly not and the largest sloping size they make is 58s. Maybe it was just two typos because you clearly know the difference.

_________________
Colnago C60 - PR99
C59 Five Years Later
My Special Colnago EPQ
Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:22 am
Posts: 3657
Location: Leg hurty
Looks pretty sweet to me Camber. :)
Personally, I would never even consider the change you proposed. :beerchug:

_________________
Pedalling Law Student.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 5767
Location: Athens, Greece
+1

_________________
My 6696gr Cipollini Bond
My 9733gr Colnago Master X-light


Top
   
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 1:22 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 8:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:42 am
Posts: 27
Location: Russia
Yes, it's my mistake,
61 size (not sloping) have 590 mm ETT. The original Colnago seatpost will be replaced to 3T Ltd with zero feedback. It will allow to install saddle optimum ~ 80-90 mm of seatback from BB. It 's large size frameset problem, with 73 degrees of a saddle tube. The saddle appears too behind. I'm look to something is shorter with ETT 580. To buy new Colnago ... it it is expensive. It is strange that they aren't really appreciated in the secondhand market. Maybe because Colnago use oldschool lugged technology. All people look to new modern aero sexy frameset. I continue to use in the winter the youthful steel GIOS TORINO (I am 42 years old), and it isn't much worse present top carbon.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. scott foil xxl

in Road

marmot

1

407

Wed Nov 09, 2016 8:19 pm

marmot View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. What BB for quarq 975 and Scott Foil

in Road

mrowkoob

0

235

Sat Jun 25, 2016 7:50 am

mrowkoob View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Thoughts on the 2016 Scott foil

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

Jakehaslam

15

1716

Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:10 pm

wheelsONfire View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cipollini Nk1k or Scott Foil 2016 HMX

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 ]

in Road

REDUTOPIA

52

4392

Tue Mar 08, 2016 9:58 pm

REDUTOPIA View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Scott Foil 10 - Issue with Saddle Post Screw

in Road

bleko

1

480

Wed Jul 06, 2016 1:47 am

RyanH View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], hanz38, MJB and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited