Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Fri May 27, 2016 9:36 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED

If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 2:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:52 pm
Posts: 467
Location: Dela-Where?
bb86 FTW!

_________________
Bar tape is overrated

Altamira 6.87 kg

2016 Foil ----> 2012 Foil


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 5:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:58 am
Posts: 1161
Location: 604
Can someone comment on the long term effects on the shell surface of pressing and pulling friction fit bearings and BB's into the BB shell? Does anyone else worry that over time getting a perfect snug fit will not be possible because the metal has been deformed or removed from multiple installs/pulls? Maybe it's just not an issue but it concerns me given that I've had creaking from the get go on my current BB30 frame.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 2940
@Petepeterson... Absolutely your long term concerns are valid, from a theoretical point of view. But in fairness and in practical use, it's probably not something that you should worry too much about since it's not like you're pulling these things out and pressing them back in on a really regular basis. But yes, over enough time and enough removals and reinstalls... anything that gets pulled in and out will wear. Lots of things these days are "throw away" items. Really nice frames shouldn't be.

As for your creaking... perhaps some Loctite 609 might help if you haven't tried that already. Otherwise, yours is just another example of a less than ideal situation.

_________________
C59 Five Years Later
My Special Colnago EPQ
Trek Emonda SL


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:30 pm
Posts: 1871
petepeterson wrote:
I've had creaking from the get go on my current BB30 frame.

If you search for BB30 posts by me you can find how I have "solved" the problem. Combination of loctite 609 and NOT using wave washers.
It has continued to work, but is just a PIA to have to be so picky about setup. And it is getting to be about time to redo the BB again, so it really depresses me.

I am not having any problems, but it has been over a year now since the last time I cleaned and lubed everything, so it is about due.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
Posts: 2689
Location: Mississippi
This could not be more similar to the Shimano v Campagnolo thread, or the Tubular v Clincher thread......no catharsis.

_________________
Mosaic RS-1
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=138478

Cielo by Chris King Cross Racer
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=134376


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 11:08 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 11:08 am
Posts: 6705
Location: Urbana, Illinois
All my bikes have the standard 68mm BS. Works very well for me. While the other systems claim or really are more stiff. Can anyone prove an actual performance difference?

It feels stiffer does not count. :smartass:

_________________
RESIDENT GRUMPY OLD MAN.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 1027
Location: Sweden
Also consider the extra drag of bigger bearings, nothing really comes close to decent square taper BSA BB's, I for one value that higher than outright stiffness on most occasions... Sure, it's probably only 1-3 watts, but I value that extra smoothness in the drivetrain so actual measurable performence doesn't really go into the equation for me... (The everlasting "you only save 0,02s in an entire race" argument that always go into these things... Sigh...)

Next best thing, BSA GXP, with a NDS bearing that actually fits the axle (read, not Sram BB).

_________________

The Shivenge


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:17 pm
Posts: 109
Location: Denmark
I for one love the ISIS BB, and feel that it´s a good stiff concept.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 2:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 544
Location: Switzerland
if i was to choose between two frames exactly the same except for how the crank bearings are fitted to the frame, and one of them is bsa. i'd choose bsa


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 1027
Location: Sweden
I for one hope BSA68 will come back, or if we must continue with 30mm axle just oversize it, "BSA30", still threaded.

Ease of manufacture shouldn't really come into play at the price point were many of these frames are at... But now we've pumped the market with so much BS that there's no going back without admitting that none of the pressfit systems were ever for the customers benefit. They were to cut manufacturing costs and to add another marketable feature to increase sale...

How many didn't think 30mm axles were an upgrade worth upgrading for all in itself?

Let's pray someone atleast invents a pressfit-to-bsa converter that works EVERY time. They all seem a bit hit 'n' miss at this point, no one has a 100% perfect ratings or reviews...

_________________

The Shivenge


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 5:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:21 pm
Posts: 166
Location: London, UK
I haven't heard any bad news about the Praxis Works BB30 converter... which is nice as I've just picked one up.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 6:06 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:59 pm
Posts: 829
Location: Ruidoso, NM
DMF wrote:
Let's pray someone at least invents a pressfit-to-bsa converter that works EVERY time.


Must be tolerances or something...

I can understand the idea of of wider bearing spacing and larger axles... and making the frame wider at the BB also. Stiffer and lighter... good stuff.

But I'm a fan of old 7700 Octalink BBs and cranks which are light and work great. Last year I shortened some Octalink cranks for TTs and now I'm thinking of getting a newer (used) frame. I mistakenly assumed that everything could be adapted to BSA... I didn't realize that so many bikes are BB86 or BB90 or BB386 or whatever else cannot even be adapted to a BSA BB. Which means new cranks and BB too and pay to get them shortened again...

That's "progress" though... the old becomes obsolete.

_________________
formerly rruff...


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:39 am
Posts: 1538
Location: Canada
I prefer BSA everytime.

Campy now has the over-torque cranksets available with bb386 cups.

That would make a very good crankset for bb386 frames. around 630gr. for the Ultra crankset with cups.

_________________
██ MARTINI


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:28 pm
Posts: 1405
Wow. I thought I'd be in the minority here, but it's BSA for me.

From a technological standpoint what is more advanced, a part which is pressed together or a part which is threaded together?

Probably one day there'll be a superior BB standard, but imo it doesn't exist yet.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:26 pm
Posts: 176
All the BB standards have their pluses and minuses. At the end of the day it comes down to frame and crank choice. I love the sisl2 so I have two bb30 (press fit) Cannondales with zero issues. I did have some issues with my Tarmac sl3 bb30 but that was due to improper installation by the shop. The only standards I tend to avoid are ones that severely limit my crank selection. (386evo and BBright are 2 good examples.) In terms of ease of install and serviceability threaded standards are always going to be easier but at the potential sacrifice of weight and stiffness.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. light bb86 crankset verdict ?

in Road

felipedana

9

780

Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:02 am

Kayrehn View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Can you run a Campagnolo 12/29 with a standards 53/39 crank?

in Road

kbradfor

8

468

Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:01 pm

kbradfor View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2013 Supersix Value

in Road

eagle34

3

662

Fri Aug 14, 2015 6:32 pm

eagle34 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Boardman AIR 9.2 2013

in Road

Pirlo

0

167

Sun May 22, 2016 9:51 pm

Pirlo View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cervelo S2 2009/2010 or R3 2013?

in Road

KAoslo

5

381

Fri May 27, 2016 8:17 pm

geedawg View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], Ltoddokc, meesterbond, Shmitt and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited