HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:52 pm
Posts: 108
bb86 FTW!

_________________
Cervelo R2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 5:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:58 am
Posts: 797
Location: 604
Can someone comment on the long term effects on the shell surface of pressing and pulling friction fit bearings and BB's into the BB shell? Does anyone else worry that over time getting a perfect snug fit will not be possible because the metal has been deformed or removed from multiple installs/pulls? Maybe it's just not an issue but it concerns me given that I've had creaking from the get go on my current BB30 frame.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 5:17 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 1295
@Petepeterson... Absolutely your long term concerns are valid, from a theoretical point of view. But in fairness and in practical use, it's probably not something that you should worry too much about since it's not like you're pulling these things out and pressing them back in on a really regular basis. But yes, over enough time and enough removals and reinstalls... anything that gets pulled in and out will wear. Lots of things these days are "throw away" items. Really nice frames shouldn't be.

As for your creaking... perhaps some Loctite 609 might help if you haven't tried that already. Otherwise, yours is just another example of a less than ideal situation.

_________________
My Colnago C59
My Special Colnago EPQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:30 pm
Posts: 1515
petepeterson wrote:
I've had creaking from the get go on my current BB30 frame.

If you search for BB30 posts by me you can find how I have "solved" the problem. Combination of loctite 609 and NOT using wave washers.
It has continued to work, but is just a PIA to have to be so picky about setup. And it is getting to be about time to redo the BB again, so it really depresses me.

I am not having any problems, but it has been over a year now since the last time I cleaned and lubed everything, so it is about due.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
Posts: 2360
Location: Mississippi
This could not be more similar to the Shimano v Campagnolo thread, or the Tubular v Clincher thread......no catharsis.

_________________
Cervelo R3

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=125962


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 11:08 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 11:08 am
Posts: 6226
Location: Urbana, Illinois
All my bikes have the standard 68mm BS. Works very well for me. While the other systems claim or really are more stiff. Can anyone prove an actual performance difference?

It feels stiffer does not count. :smartass:

_________________
-For my next trick I will set myself on fire!
-This board and the world in general would be a much nicer place if everyone could just take themselves a little less seriously.
-Sticky Fingers John Rockefeller
-First one over the cliff wins!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 963
Location: Sweden
Also consider the extra drag of bigger bearings, nothing really comes close to decent square taper BSA BB's, I for one value that higher than outright stiffness on most occasions... Sure, it's probably only 1-3 watts, but I value that extra smoothness in the drivetrain so actual measurable performence doesn't really go into the equation for me... (The everlasting "you only save 0,02s in an entire race" argument that always go into these things... Sigh...)

Next best thing, BSA GXP, with a NDS bearing that actually fits the axle (read, not Sram BB).

_________________
Roadbike
Planet X Stealth w/ drop bars

Mountainbike
Van Nicholas Zion Ti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:17 pm
Posts: 32
Location: Denmark
I for one love the ISIS BB, and feel that it´s a good stiff concept.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 2:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 416
Location: Switzerland
if i was to choose between two frames exactly the same except for how the crank bearings are fitted to the frame, and one of them is bsa. i'd choose bsa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 963
Location: Sweden
I for one hope BSA68 will come back, or if we must continue with 30mm axle just oversize it, "BSA30", still threaded.

Ease of manufacture shouldn't really come into play at the price point were many of these frames are at... But now we've pumped the market with so much BS that there's no going back without admitting that none of the pressfit systems were ever for the customers benefit. They were to cut manufacturing costs and to add another marketable feature to increase sale...

How many didn't think 30mm axles were an upgrade worth upgrading for all in itself?

Let's pray someone atleast invents a pressfit-to-bsa converter that works EVERY time. They all seem a bit hit 'n' miss at this point, no one has a 100% perfect ratings or reviews...

_________________
Roadbike
Planet X Stealth w/ drop bars

Mountainbike
Van Nicholas Zion Ti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 5:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:21 pm
Posts: 166
Location: London, UK
I haven't heard any bad news about the Praxis Works BB30 converter... which is nice as I've just picked one up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 6:06 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:59 pm
Posts: 634
Location: Ruidoso, NM
DMF wrote:
Let's pray someone at least invents a pressfit-to-bsa converter that works EVERY time.


Must be tolerances or something...

I can understand the idea of of wider bearing spacing and larger axles... and making the frame wider at the BB also. Stiffer and lighter... good stuff.

But I'm a fan of old 7700 Octalink BBs and cranks which are light and work great. Last year I shortened some Octalink cranks for TTs and now I'm thinking of getting a newer (used) frame. I mistakenly assumed that everything could be adapted to BSA... I didn't realize that so many bikes are BB86 or BB90 or BB386 or whatever else cannot even be adapted to a BSA BB. Which means new cranks and BB too and pay to get them shortened again...

That's "progress" though... the old becomes obsolete.

_________________
formerly rruff...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:39 am
Posts: 1441
I prefer BSA everytime.

Campy now has the over-torque cranksets available with bb386 cups.

That would make a very good crankset for bb386 frames. around 630gr. for the Ultra crankset with cups.

_________________
██ MARTINI bike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:28 pm
Posts: 1403
Wow. I thought I'd be in the minority here, but it's BSA for me.

From a technological standpoint what is more advanced, a part which is pressed together or a part which is threaded together?

Probably one day there'll be a superior BB standard, but imo it doesn't exist yet.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:19 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:26 pm
Posts: 159
All the BB standards have their pluses and minuses. At the end of the day it comes down to frame and crank choice. I love the sisl2 so I have two bb30 (press fit) Cannondales with zero issues. I did have some issues with my Tarmac sl3 bb30 but that was due to improper installation by the shop. The only standards I tend to avoid are ones that severely limit my crank selection. (386evo and BBright are 2 good examples.) In terms of ease of install and serviceability threaded standards are always going to be easier but at the potential sacrifice of weight and stiffness.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], djconnel, Exabot [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], highdraw, LouisN, Martin1977, micropox and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2011 Hi mod vs 2013 evo

in Road

Northoceanbeach

0

722

Sun Oct 27, 2013 7:13 am

Northoceanbeach View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Parlee Z5 SLi 2013

in Road

adrianishikawa

9

1271

Wed Apr 16, 2014 5:29 pm

runner999 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. felt ar2 di2 2013 bb type???

in Road

fotispao

3

135

Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:14 pm

53x12 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Baddest bike of 2013?

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

in Road

elviento

47

7002

Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:58 pm

barsook77 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Reynolds 32 2013 Vs Attack 2014, which one?

in Road

eckhous

6

792

Tue Mar 04, 2014 2:17 am

eckhous View the latest post


It is currently Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:48 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB