Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:53 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:14 pm
Posts: 32
Location: South
I would like to know if any one on the forum has experience of this wheel set?

I currently own a set of Enve 6.7's which I really enjoy on flat and rolling terrain but feel a lower profile wheel set would be more beneficial for the short steep climbs near by. Also I find the deep section front of the Enve's a little draining when it's windy.

Any flexing issues or hub problems (I've read there is a new hub for 2014).

Thanks

_________________
2013 Pinarello Dogma 65.1
2014 Cannodale SS Evo


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 4:46 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 359
Why not 3.4 out of curiosity?

I also own 6.7's as well as 3.4's and 2013 Zipp 404's and it's a hard choice some days.

202's are nice from what I've seen but I have no experience on them.

_________________
carbonLORD.com


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:26 pm
Posts: 178
202 tubs are a great climbing wheel but I don't understand the point of the 202 clincher when Enve 3.4s can be built up around the same weight. My 3.4 clinchers with alchemy hubs weigh in at 1420 grams with rim strips.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:37 am
Posts: 5751
Location: Phoenix Arizona
They're a damn nice wheel. The new hubs are a good change from past versions (and there are a LOT of past versions in just the last couple years as they made running changes.

They're a 32mm depth front and rear and have damn near no cross wind response... The weights are published.

Maybe the biggest win is at the brake track. If you're talking clinchers, Zipps braking is the best in the carbon clinch class right now. Zero heat issues, very consistent feel.

_________________
charles@pezcyclingnews.com


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:14 pm
Posts: 32
Location: South
Carbon Lord:

I've not owned a Zipp wheelset and now that they are offering an improved hub I'm keen to give them a try, the aesthetics of the 3.4's don't do it for me this either.

asv:

Zipp 202 FC are quoted as 1380g which is still a little bit less? Plus If they are that close in weight I prefer the look over the 3.4's.

CharlesM:

Have you tried the new 188/V9 Hub? If so how do you find it in comparison to previous versions (a noticeable difference or subtle change)?

I find the breaking on the Enve 6.7's very good unless it's damp. It will be interesting to feel the difference.

Thanks for your replies.

_________________
2013 Pinarello Dogma 65.1
2014 Cannodale SS Evo


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:23 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Austin, TX
Love my 202's. Best wheels I've ever ridden. Braking performance is phenomenal and cross winds are complete non-issue. If had to pick them over again I'd still get the 202's but I'd probably have them custom built with better hubs. Not that the hubs are bad but there are better ones.

_________________
My Cervelo R5
My Lynskey Helix
My MTB


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 6:07 pm
Posts: 16
I love my 202 FC too, but at 135 lbs I do feel the wind sometimes. That's why I avoided the 3.4s.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:32 pm
Posts: 797
Location: belgium
Consider Hyperons.

_________________
Bianchi EV3, Master Olympic, Pinarello Asolo


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 4003
Location: Natovi Landing
Love my 202s also (2011 version)

Rear hub does have a bit of play and that could be better yes.

Not too bothered by that as I can live without rear pads being close to rims, but it is a downside.

That's the only real downside though. The 32mm depth wide-ish pre FC rim is a nice effort with some aero benefits while still feeling nimble.

I ruled out hyperons on account of poor aerodynamics - wld do my f***ing head in riding around with -15W on my mind all the time :-)

_________________
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!! :thumbup:


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 565
sawyer wrote:
wld do my f***ing head in riding around with -15W on my mind all the time :-)

ha! I've had this exact same thing (and number) in my head in the last few days. I usually race on some cheap carbon/alu aero wheels, but they're a little flexy for pounding out of corners, so I wanna put back on my alu wheels for the stiffness and 'snap'.

So, I was riding home last Thursday from a race in which I didn't do as well as I expected to, and was saying to myself: "that's it! These wheels are going back on my other bike, but can I handle the extra 15w of drag? Nah, stuff it, I'm going back to 28 spokes and aluminium."

Ha :thumbup:


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 10:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:14 pm
Posts: 32
Location: South
There's a trade show on this weekend near me so I'm hoping they will have some of the 2014 Zipp offerings on show. I will take some pictures and post over the weekend.

_________________
2013 Pinarello Dogma 65.1
2014 Cannodale SS Evo


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 5:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:44 pm
Posts: 113
202 fc's are noticeably faster, more comfortable and sounds much better than my ksyriums. (I've ridden ksyrium elite, sl, sls)
Conti 4000s 23c tires measure 24.94mm wide on them.
For 32mm profile they are light.
Weights are with 23c 4000s tires/110psi and xg1090 11/28 red cassette on. (1207g/922g)

Image
Image


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 7:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:14 pm
Posts: 32
Location: South
Thanks for the weights and pictures Boralb. Your SS Evo looks great with them!

_________________
2013 Pinarello Dogma 65.1
2014 Cannodale SS Evo


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 8:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:44 pm
Posts: 113
Sparks wrote:
Thanks for the weights and pictures Boralb. Your SS Evo looks great with them!


You're welcome Sparks, thank you...


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Zipp 202 Firecrest
PostPosted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:18 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 2578
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
The 202 is a good rim. I rebuilt a wheel with one as the original Zipp wheel has a cracked hub. The customer after some discussion went for a Royce Venus hubs. What a delight. Cannot remember the final weight but the rim was 430g if I remember. Not too bad.

_________________
www.thecycleclinic.co.uk


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 202 Firecrest clincher flex

in Road

thencameyou

8

949

Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:10 am

kgt View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 404 set or 404/808 (606)

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

coneill0422

15

1715

Mon Nov 09, 2015 11:22 am

Samuel Sanchez Gonzalez View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 303 NSW?

in Road

troydupe

3

1624

Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:32 pm

4151zero View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 303 or 404 for Do-it-All Wheels

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 ]

in Road

ryanw

56

4344

Wed Jun 08, 2016 1:15 pm

Odonata View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp bearing?

in Road

PLuKE

9

651

Fri Jul 08, 2016 11:04 pm

PLuKE View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], McGilli, MSNbot Media, OhPinchy, Yahoo [Bot] and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited