Open mold wide profile carbon wheels

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

thegunner
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:38 am

by thegunner

is there any company doing the 25mm wide wheels in 60+ mm aside from carbonzone? checked farsports, but it doesn't look like they do the rims alone, and light-bicycle doesn't do the u-shaped rim for anything outside the 45mm.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



DrGalactus
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:45 am
Location: Bristol, UK
Contact:

by DrGalactus

Light-bicycle will do the U shaped rims in other depths, email them to see if they have any 60mm available, I know they do 90mm.

kulivontot
Posts: 1163
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm

by kulivontot

Two questions:
1. What's considered "wide" for aero wheels these days? 23mm? 25mm? 27mm? Zipp says they're 26.5, Reynolds are 26.2. Enve is 26mm.
2. Is there a company that does lightweight ~50mm "wide" tubulars? I got a farsports 88mm tubular wheelset that weights 1450g. Most of these companies are selling 50mm wide tubular wheels that weigh this much. For narrow 50mm tubulars, farsports has a ~350g rim that'll build up at 1150g. Does it really take that much more material to make a rim 5mm wider?

pushstart
Posts: 461
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:12 am

by pushstart

I have a set of the Farsports 24mm-wide (50mm) deep rims. They are a nice shape, though not a lot to compare them to. I like the wider (17mm) inner width. One thing is that Farsports' idea of high-temp (220F for my rims) is lower than others. I had to retension the wheels after a few hundred miles, but I still think they were/are good value. Braking leaves a lot to be desired , but I guess this is pretty par for the course with carbon.

I just bought a set of Light Bicycle U45 rims without braking surface for road disc-brake wheels I am building myself. Quality seems a bit better than Farsports from perspective of the surface finish, but that may just be differences in matte UD (Farsports) and matte 3k (LB). Decided to build myself this time. A little more expensive, but LB didn't offer hub choice I was looking for, and I would rather use CX Ray spokes than Pillar equiv, due to familiarity. Weight came in very close to advertised average (449g and 453g, for advertised 450g).

tk2306
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 3:40 am
Location: Melbourne - Aus

by tk2306

Hey guys old member here. Old account was having problems so created a new one :D.

I bought a pair of 23mm wide 50mm deep carbon clinchers from Helin Lius ebay store carbonspeedcycle 2 days ago. Helin told me that they would take ~4 days to build and 7-10 days to arrive after that. I was tossing up these or some of the farsports clinchers or the LB45's however these came out on sale to be over $100 cheaper. Wheels will be used mostly for criteriums and club road races where I cannot be bothered running the risk of tubs. Ordered matte ud rims, red nipples and an 11 speed shimano/sram freehub as my team bike next year will have 11 speed sram red. Will be running them 10 speed with the spacer for the time being though.

Has anyone else tried any of the wide wheels from Helin Liu / carbonspeedcycle?

sspring
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 7:06 pm

by sspring

tk2306 wrote:Hey guys old member here. Old account was having problems so created a new one :D.

I bought a pair of 23mm wide 50mm deep carbon clinchers from Helin Lius ebay store carbonspeedcycle 2 days ago. Helin told me that they would take ~4 days to build and 7-10 days to arrive after that. I was tossing up these or some of the farsports clinchers or the LB45's however these came out on sale to be over $100 cheaper. Wheels will be used mostly for criteriums and club road races where I cannot be bothered running the risk of tubs. Ordered matte ud rims, red nipples and an 11 speed shimano/sram freehub as my team bike next year will have 11 speed sram red. Will be running them 10 speed with the spacer for the time being though.

Has anyone else tried any of the wide wheels from Helin Liu / carbonspeedcycle?



I can't speak to the durability of the wheels but i can speak regarding the design. Essentially what you bought was a slightly wider V-shape clincher wheel, aka pre Firecrest. Its good and it'll work a lot better than a box wheel that's for sure but its not a newer design. To put it into context a 303 Firecrest, and the LB 45 clone, is as aero as a 80 mm V shape rim and far better in a crosswind.

tk2306
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 3:40 am
Location: Melbourne - Aus

by tk2306

I am aware they are not one of the new 'aero' shapes, I was going to purchase the 20.5mm version of the wheels but as these where discounted and I have been keen in trying some wider profile rims/wheels out I thought I would give them a crack. As I said these will mostly be used for crits a lot of which mine involve an uphill sprint nearly flat out every lap so went for these over some of the heavier more 'aero' shaped wheels out there :thumbup:

User avatar
WMW
in the industry
Posts: 893
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:59 pm
Location: Ruidoso, NM

by WMW

sspring wrote:To put it into context a 303 Firecrest, and the LB 45 clone, is as aero as a 80 mm V shape rim and far better in a crosswind.


If you can believe Reynolds their extremely pointy latest design has very good aero properties. Plus a lot of users report good crosswind performance.

Makes me wonder if the rim width (relative to the tire) is more important than rim shape...

Image
formerly rruff...

sspring
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 7:06 pm

by sspring

WMW wrote:
sspring wrote:To put it into context a 303 Firecrest, and the LB 45 clone, is as aero as a 80 mm V shape rim and far better in a crosswind.


If you can believe Reynolds their extremely pointy latest design has very good aero properties. Plus a lot of users report good crosswind performance.

Makes me wonder if the rim width (relative to the tire) is more important than rim shape...

Image



Not sure on that one, the whole point of the wide rims in the first place was to create a virtual airfoil on the trailing edge of each wheel. In order to do that the rim has to be wider than the tire. Now if the V-shape is wide enough and so wide that the tire has less width than the rim, it might be possible to create the Virtual Airfoil that way. However, the shape would have to be optimized for that and if you look at the Reynolds it does flatten out towards the tire, so it could be the case on that wheel. I think its both factors, width and shape.

V-shape rims is like riding a TT bike backwards! It doesn't work like that and creates a lot of drag. It'll still be more aero than a round tube bike but not by much.

A very wide V shape could possibly create a virtual airfoil but I doubt it would do it as well as say a 303 Firecrest. However the leading edge of the wheel would possibly be more aero than the 303 FC and overall they could be pretty close.

Wheel design is fascinating to me as its a balance between being aero on the leading edge of the wheel and the trialing edge at the same time.

The best design I think is one that finds the wheel shape that works best for the front wheel and then the best design for the rear wheel. Each one would be slightly different as there are tubes and legs pedaling causing all kinds of wind flow fluctuations. I think this is what you will see happening as the next evolution. Enve i think is doing the right thing by starting along that path.

Zigmeister
Posts: 938
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:09 pm

by Zigmeister

Straight line, headwind, those Reynolds are probably very aero and well done. In a xwind, not so much.

They have studied the common angles of wind riders encounter during races/riding from the peloton. That is how they came up with 10-15 degrees as an optimum angle to design aerodynamically for.

Hence, they then came up with the toroidal shape with the blunt/fatter section of the rim where the spokes are, and the slightly narrow brake track than the fattest part of the rim.

So, as the angle of wind increases, they are way more aero than the deep-V design, because when you are riding in the pack, or solo, it is highly unlikely, except track racing, you will be in a direct headwind all the time, or now wind at all.

User avatar
WMW
in the industry
Posts: 893
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:59 pm
Location: Ruidoso, NM

by WMW

I know the marketing story... but 10-15 deg isn't the yaw that is most important to me in TTs... more like half that. They aren't *designed* for 10-15 deg... rather this is the place where you *can* make a deep rim have less drag than a shallow one by delaying stall. Most people seem to think the Firecrests are good in crosswinds, which is a nice feature. But based on the testing I've seen, the new Zipps don't really have less drag than the old ones... unless you put a fat tire on them. Dig up some tests of the old 808 and the new one, and curves look nearly identical.

I haven't seen any independent aero tests of the Reynolds rims, but oddly every user opinion I've seen states they are stable in crosswinds... which I don't think would happen unless stall was delayed out to high yaw like the other good rims.
formerly rruff...

petepeterson
Posts: 1402
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:58 am
Location: 604

by petepeterson

Have any of you actually ever had a difficult time handling your bike with 50-60mm wheels in cross winds? People love talking about it but I have never had any issues with it. Maybe it's because I am big.

chazmtb
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:08 am

by chazmtb

Has anyone gotten the light bicycle 90mm u rim. I am planning to get the rear for flat tri setup with my 45mm u front.

eric
Posts: 2196
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
Contact:

by eric

petepeterson wrote:Have any of you actually ever had a difficult time handling your bike with 50-60mm wheels in cross winds? People love talking about it but I have never had any issues with it. Maybe it's because I am big.


I've done some big mountain descents after races here in California where the wind was gusting pretty hard and I got blown around enough that I slowed down. I've been blown around on regular rims too, but it can be worse on deep section rims. My race weight over the years has been 138-144 lbs.

A consistent wind is not so bad (just don't try to ride no hands). Random gusts are more difficult to handle.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



User avatar
WMW
in the industry
Posts: 893
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:59 pm
Location: Ruidoso, NM

by WMW

petepeterson wrote:Have any of you actually ever had a difficult time handling your bike with 50-60mm wheels in cross winds? People love talking about it but I have never had any issues with it. Maybe it's because I am big.


Do you race when there are 50+ mph gusts? I do...
formerly rruff...

Post Reply