Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:17 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 6:45 pm
Posts: 10
Have you noticed any differences going back to regular rings after using Rotor Rings if any


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:52 pm
Posts: 218
Location: eNZed
I'm one of those who didn't notice any significant difference + or -ve whilst trying out O'symetric, easily going between them and round. I've aborted my trial so will gladly offload my 50/38 compact 110mm.

_________________
Less is more.


Last edited by shimmeD on Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:28 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:28 am
Posts: 118
Location: Berkeley, CA
I rode Q rings for at least 6 months before switching back to round rings. The round rings felt very strange for the first couple of minutes, but after that my pedal stroke smoothed out. That was the only difference I noticed.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 6:45 pm
Posts: 10
Did you find the Rotor Rings helped your pedal stroke and going back to round rings was easier


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 8:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 6:06 am
Posts: 968
Location: Perth, Western Australia
I have just fitted Rotor rings on my new training bike, had them lying round a while and I decided to try them out. Swapping between bikes I don't notice any real difference, they are on setting 3 to start with. I will let you know if I notice any differences as I do more km on the Rotor rings.

_________________
Ozrider - Western Australia
Parlee Z5 XL (6055g/13.32lbs) Trek Madone 5.9 (7052-7500g)Jonesman Columbus Spirit (8680g)
Chase your dreams - it's only impossible until it's done


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 9:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:31 pm
Posts: 1049
Like others, switching back to round rings felt odd for a half an hour or so but then I noticed no difference.

I ended up switching to shorter cranks over a period of time and I've not looked back. I did this after a winter of experimentation on the Wattbike - which used 170mm cranks.

Since getting used to that, my pedal stroke has improved substantially as evidenced by looking at the polar patterns generated by the wattbike.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 1:08 am
Posts: 8
I noticed a bigger difference going from osymetric to round than from Rotor to round. Using round rings now I seem to run at a higher heart rate for a given power (measured, but I should probably do more tests). In general, I feel like I expend more energy with round rings for an equivalent output, but this could be that I'm now so used to osymetric. I also have Rotor rings on my other bike, but they are about halfway between round and osymetric in terms of noticeable effect. So if you find Osymetic too dramatic Rotor might be a good middle ground. For me though I cant go back.. I just wish Osymetric rings werent so heavy. 110BCD 52t in the new thicker design is ~200g (big ring only)! A friend of mine who owns a machine shop drilled out holes to drop it 75g but its still really heavy and not very stiff.

One more thing, I think its easier to utilize a longer crank with Osymetric. Longer cranks typically made dragging through the dead zone exhausting on round rings but now its a breeze, and the increased leverage on the pedal stroke seems to make a difference. I ordered some 190mm Ciamillo cranks for this reason but havent tried them quite yet...


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:49 am
Posts: 2181
Location: Denmark
The Rotor QXL rings are not much heavier than the normal Q-rings and shifts very well, not at least because of their stiffness compared to the other brand you mention.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 6:45 pm
Posts: 10
Has anybody noticed a drop in watts.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:28 pm
Posts: 1185
You will notice that your bike shifts-


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:28 am
Posts: 118
Location: Berkeley, CA
windsurfingodie wrote:
Did you find the Rotor Rings helped your pedal stroke and going back to round rings was easier

I was always more of a spinner to begin with. The Q rings actually tended to make me spin slower which I didn't really like, so while my cadence increased going back to round rings it really just went back to normal. Regarding loss of watts I was immediately faster going back to round rings, but that probably has more to do with waxing and waning of form that chain rings.

I did try switching back to the Q rings for a crit and went from rolling around and chatting during the race to just hanging on. This was the same course with the same group of people at a similar average speed a week later. So, for me at least, the switch from round to Q rings is a much bigger difference than the switch from Q rings to round.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:49 pm
Posts: 16
I have ridden Q-Rings on my race bike for nearly 8 years now. I run round rings on my training bike, sometimes with a standard crank and sometimes with PowerCranks. The biggest difference is my heart rate is a little higher for a given power output on round rings and my top end power is higher on Q-Rings. I don't really feel any difference between Q-Rings and round rings.

I have also raced with Osymetric rings and Rotor RSX4 cranks, all work as advertised for me. Only the PowerCranks improve your pedal stroke, but it takes time and dedication. I have been training on PowerCranks off and on over 8 years, first 2 years exclusively except races. My best time trials were done on Osymetric rings, but the Q-Rings feel more natural. The Rotor RSX4 felt the fastest, but I could never match my best on Osymetric rings. To get the most from Q-Rings or Osymetric rings you need to have a pretty smooth pedal stroke to begin with. If you are not applying significant power through the dead spots you probably won't see any significant performance benefit and there is a penalty in shift quality.

My pedal stroke is smoothest on round rings, based on Computrainer SpinScan, 75+ on round rings and ~65-68 on Q-Rings.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 5:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:27 pm
Posts: 439
Wookieopolis wrote:
windsurfingodie wrote:
Did you find the Rotor Rings helped your pedal stroke and going back to round rings was easier

I was always more of a spinner to begin with. The Q rings actually tended to make me spin slower which I didn't really like, so while my cadence increased going back to round rings it really just went back to normal. Regarding loss of watts I was immediately faster going back to round rings, but that probably has more to do with waxing and waning of form that chain rings.

I did try switching back to the Q rings for a crit and went from rolling around and chatting during the race to just hanging on. This was the same course with the same group of people at a similar average speed a week later. So, for me at least, the switch from round to Q rings is a much bigger difference than the switch from Q rings to round.


Interesting I find quite the opposite. Going to Q-rings increased my cadence at least 10rpm on climbs. I'm using the OCP3 position.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:05 pm
Posts: 39
I have round rings on one bike and ovals on another, after 6 months on the Ovals I dont notice the difference when I switch between bikes.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:45 am
Posts: 176
On one Sworks Tarmac I have Qring 36, normal 50.

On the other I have Qrings 34 - 50.

I can no longer notice a difference between any of them. No idea if they make me faster or not, but I like the engineering principle behind them, so......

_________________
http://www.cyclespeedtours.com
5 star and bespoke cycle tours in Majorca


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Rotor Q-rings for Campagnolo

in Road

Attermann

2

431

Thu Sep 24, 2015 5:06 am

maggierose View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Sram Etap - Rotor Q rings

in Road

bruno2000

1

461

Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:20 pm

oskarbike View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. absolute black vs rotor Q rings - what is the equivalent OCP?

in Road

pavel

2

330

Tue May 24, 2016 3:46 pm

Marin View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Carbon ti rings versus praxis rings

in Road

coppercook62

7

729

Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:17 am

KCookie View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Rotor Qarbon Q-rings - it is aluminium and carbon inserts.

in Road

LeviR

11

1187

Sat Feb 20, 2016 3:34 pm

lewolive View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: HammerTime2, joshclick, scottw1987 and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited