HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:43 am
Posts: 94
I always read that powertap measures lower than srm because of drivetrain losses . I thought that doesn't make sense as the hub and crank are always connected by the chain. So the srm should see the same drivetrain losses.
Here's my analogy.
Say you hooked up a dynometer to the front of an engine then disconnected or pushed in clutch and measured horsepower. You would get the power of the engine. Then you jacked up car in air put it in gear and tested again so you'd add the drivetrain losses. But on a bike like we where saying everything is always connected so it doesn't matter where it is measured along the drivetrain.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:29 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:43 am
Posts: 94
Just to preface I'm looking for someone to prove me wrong as I Definately might be. Thought it might be an interesting topic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 8:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:51 pm
Posts: 939
Location: France
Unfortunately you are incorrect.

The crank and hub may be connected by a chain but there are losses in the drive train, i.e. stress in the chain rivets and losses through heat, sound etc. These losses must be over come by the power generated at the crank and so a hub based powermeter will read lower than the power generated at the crank.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:30 pm
Posts: 1504
I think it is correct that there are losses between the crank and the rear hub.
But I don't think they are very much. I suspect it would be lower than the accuracy of either unit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:41 pm
Posts: 220
Location: Shetland, Scotland
5W - 10W in transmission (chain) losses?
http://www.friction-facts.com/ultrafast-overview


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:43 am
Posts: 94
Ah I kept thinking about it and finally came to the conclusion that even though they are linked by a chain. The location of the powermeter is the difference. Everything ahead of powermeter although experienced isn't measured. So for the srm chainrings its measuring everything after the spider. So this would include chain friction. But it would not include pedal bearings or bottom bracket bearings as they are ahead of the spider so if those frictions went up although you would feel it your srm wouldn't be measuring it. Just took me awhile to get it clear in my head.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:05 pm
Posts: 3
I have a quarq and was wondering which way is the best to calibrate the meter? Spinning the crank backwards 5 revolutions or calibrating it from the Garmin?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:54 pm
Posts: 345
*Best* is through the Garmin. IMO, the question is whether the backpedal is *good enough*.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 6:14 pm
Posts: 2
brianwelchde wrote:
I have a quarq and was wondering which way is the best to calibrate the meter? Spinning the crank backwards 5 revolutions or calibrating it from the Garmin?
Agreed with the above and add that neither are actually a calibration, they are setting zero offset. In order to calibrate it you need a very precisely known weight and the ability to connect the "qalvin" android or iphone to your powermeter, or send it back to Quarq.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2013 1:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:29 am
Posts: 35
I may be wrong, but I assume that the farther a power measuring device is mechanically from the source of the power will introduce variables such as flex, friction, heat,etc... that will make accuracy more difficult to obtain.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 4:43 pm
Posts: 5
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
DC Rainmaker typically sees a loss of 5-10W in his tests. I trust the guy as a guru.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:40 pm
Posts: 194
Accuracy may suffer but you only need precision for proper training.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:50 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 11:08 am
Posts: 6777
Location: Urbana, Illinois
brianwelchde wrote:
I have a quarq and was wondering which way is the best to calibrate the meter? Spinning the crank backwards 5 revolutions or calibrating it from the Garmin?


Answer part 2.

Pedaling backwards or using the Garmin is zeroing the power meter not calibrating it. Zeroing it brings the meter back to zero from drift. Calibrating is tuning the meter to show a given value against a known value of torque on the meter.

_________________
-For my next trick I will set myself on fire!
-This board and the world in general would be a much nicer place if everyone could just take themselves a little less seriously.
-Sticky Fingers John Rockefeller
-First one over the cliff wins!


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:50 am 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: joec, mischiefchowder and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Fibrelyte chainring on a XX1 drivetrain

in MTB

konky

9

734

Sat Sep 07, 2013 10:14 am

Mattias Hellöre View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Raceface 1x drivetrain specific crank?

in MTB

doctacosmos

4

780

Sun Sep 22, 2013 3:52 am

limba View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Nuseti - a bike with 'hidden' drivetrain

in Cycle Chat

tymon_tm

9

786

Mon Jul 07, 2014 11:18 pm

Pharmstrong View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Campa chain on SRAM drivetrain?

in Road

addict

2

181

Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:32 pm

Imaking20 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Drivetrain feels weird/Dereailleur skipping?

in Road

Kermithimself

6

427

Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:39 pm

Kermithimself View the latest post


It is currently Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:06 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB