Srm/quarq powertap drivetrain losses dispelled?
Moderator: Moderator Team
I always read that powertap measures lower than srm because of drivetrain losses . I thought that doesn't make sense as the hub and crank are always connected by the chain. So the srm should see the same drivetrain losses.
Here's my analogy.
Say you hooked up a dynometer to the front of an engine then disconnected or pushed in clutch and measured horsepower. You would get the power of the engine. Then you jacked up car in air put it in gear and tested again so you'd add the drivetrain losses. But on a bike like we where saying everything is always connected so it doesn't matter where it is measured along the drivetrain.
Here's my analogy.
Say you hooked up a dynometer to the front of an engine then disconnected or pushed in clutch and measured horsepower. You would get the power of the engine. Then you jacked up car in air put it in gear and tested again so you'd add the drivetrain losses. But on a bike like we where saying everything is always connected so it doesn't matter where it is measured along the drivetrain.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Unfortunately you are incorrect.
The crank and hub may be connected by a chain but there are losses in the drive train, i.e. stress in the chain rivets and losses through heat, sound etc. These losses must be over come by the power generated at the crank and so a hub based powermeter will read lower than the power generated at the crank.
The crank and hub may be connected by a chain but there are losses in the drive train, i.e. stress in the chain rivets and losses through heat, sound etc. These losses must be over come by the power generated at the crank and so a hub based powermeter will read lower than the power generated at the crank.
-
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:41 pm
- Location: Shetland, Scotland
5W - 10W in transmission (chain) losses?
http://www.friction-facts.com/ultrafast-overview
http://www.friction-facts.com/ultrafast-overview
Ah I kept thinking about it and finally came to the conclusion that even though they are linked by a chain. The location of the powermeter is the difference. Everything ahead of powermeter although experienced isn't measured. So for the srm chainrings its measuring everything after the spider. So this would include chain friction. But it would not include pedal bearings or bottom bracket bearings as they are ahead of the spider so if those frictions went up although you would feel it your srm wouldn't be measuring it. Just took me awhile to get it clear in my head.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:05 pm
I have a quarq and was wondering which way is the best to calibrate the meter? Spinning the crank backwards 5 revolutions or calibrating it from the Garmin?
Agreed with the above and add that neither are actually a calibration, they are setting zero offset. In order to calibrate it you need a very precisely known weight and the ability to connect the "qalvin" android or iphone to your powermeter, or send it back to Quarq.brianwelchde wrote:I have a quarq and was wondering which way is the best to calibrate the meter? Spinning the crank backwards 5 revolutions or calibrating it from the Garmin?
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 4:43 pm
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
DC Rainmaker typically sees a loss of 5-10W in his tests. I trust the guy as a guru.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com