spytech wrote:[...] he did say they were 178g
or so... AFAIK different figures are floating around.
Probably different versions (normal/Skyline) - who knows...
Moderator: robbosmans
Florian wrote:spytech wrote:nino says "some new cranks (should be lighter than the Storck)" which cranks is he talking about.
I guess he means the upcoming tune carbon cranks said to weigh 210 g - still in prototype stage though!
Florian wrote:spytech wrote:i think he said 178g - or did he mention 210g somewhere else?
Nino is not the only source out there.
I read the 210 g in a German forum.
spytech wrote:ahhh, sucks, i was looking forward, to losing 1/2 lb if that frame ever came into market this year. so i guess we wont see a 800 gram frame
jim wrote:for me, it is a challenge and fun to build a bike as light as possible, yet have it remain 100% usable, be reliable, etc. i also like having trick looking parts on my bike, that set themselves apart from the norm.
If you want to see 'meh' content of me and my bike you can follow my life in pictures here!'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'
mrowkoob wrote:Ok guys fill me in what´s the point in striving after a bike and the components like the Giant when it´s under UCI weight limit anyway? Excepts for the moment when UCI lowers it ofcourse.
mrowkoob wrote:Ok guys fill me in what´s the point in striving after a bike and the components like the Giant when it´s under UCI weight limit anyway? Excepts for the moment when UCI lowers it ofcourse.