HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Posts: 7
Thanks for the reply eric.

Can I swap out the spindle for say one from Rotor or Quark or wont that fit Cannondale cranks? I've never swapped/taken apart a BB before (in case I just said something stupid).

Cheers


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:04 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:41 pm
Posts: 720
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
even if it would be possible the chainline and q-faktor will nog be that good, considering that the crankset is made for 68 bottombracket shell


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Posts: 7
ok, thanks for the reply jensw - thats a very valid point. i guess im gonna have to take another look at rotor 3d. i guess theyre good, i just hate the graphics on them :-)

Skickat från min GT-N7100 via Tapatalk 2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 10:38 pm
Posts: 1193
Location: NorCal
Image

It's been done, but it required a custom fabricated bottom bracket that you can't get anymore. I had 2 and sold both. I really wish that I had kept both of them....

_________________
Have you ever wondered if there was more to life, other than being really, really, ridiculously good looking?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:33 pm
Posts: 167
I'm not so sure that it cant work. Keep in mind that the sisl2 is wider than the sisl and doesn't have the step on the sisl axle. You'd have to leave off all spacers from the none drive side. Just use the the crank and bearing cover, then see if their is enought clearance for the crank to fit without bottoming out on the frame on the drive side.

It may be possible to buy a tiny bit more space by sanding down the lip on the Pressfit cups also.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:23 pm
Posts: 263
Location: Austin, TX
eric wrote:
A true BB30 crank will not fit in a BBright frame. The spindle is too short. They only fit in 68mm wide frames. Rotor and Quark 30mm spindle cranks have longer spindles and will fit.

Just a point of clarification. Your RS is NOT BBRight. It's a standard English threaded BB. Have a look at the Rotor BSA 30 BB. Might do the trick.

http://www.rotorbikeusa.com/products/bsa_bottom_bracket.html

_________________
My Cervelo R5
My Cervelo S3
My MTB


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
BBright is 11mm wider on the NDS. Does the SISL2 spindle have that much room? The ones I have seen on bikes do not look like they are even close... there are little to no spacers on the NDS, not 11mm worth.

If you could find a longer SISL spindle, or use an MTB one, you'd end up with a very wide Q factor.

30mm ID BSA external bearings won't work for a true BB30 crank. They add about 10mm to the 68mm BB width on each side. Cranks with long 30mm spindles like Rotor and Sram Quarks will work.

I understand about the Rotor graphics. But they'll go on a bike with a giant CERVELO on the down tube and a bunch of logos elsewhere so it is not going to stand out. And when you are riding you won't be looking at it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Posts: 1519
Location: Houston, Texas
rmerka wrote:
Just a point of clarification. Your RS is NOT BBRight. It's a standard English threaded BB. Have a look at the Rotor BSA 30 BB. Might do the trick.

With a mix of BB30 and BB86 frames and 3 Hollowgram & 2 FSA SRM powermeters, nobody wishes this would work more than me but sorry, the Rotor's BSA 30 BB is not going to make that work either. The Rotor 3D+ crank spindle incorporates the BB386 standard which has a 86.5mm long spindle and enough offset on the backside of the spider to allow it to work with either Rotor's BSA 30, BB30/PF30, or BB386 bottom bracket standards. As already mentioned, because of the offset of the spindle, a true BB30 crank like the Hollowgram SiSL will only work with BB30/PF30 framesets and because the hollowgram spider has next to no offset, an adapter or longer spindle is only going to push your chainrings further out from the bottom bracket shell. Take the image below of a cross chained engagement and then ask how well would that setup work if the chainrings were 5-10-15mm further out?

Image

_________________
Michael - The Anaerobic Threshold is neither...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:33 pm
Posts: 167
Good drawing. Have you tried a sisl2 spindle with BBright and hollowgram crank arms? I'm just curious how much more spindle width is needed , if any , not worried about chainline.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:49 am
Posts: 1253
The idea behind BBright is having BB30/PF30 on the drive side and a width similar to Shimano on the non-drive side. It could be an idea to make a FrankenCrank, using the SiSL2 drive side and a BBright non-drive side arm/axle, but that requires the same spline interface with the correct placement width. Just a thought...

_________________
RideWert.com
Wert Cycling on Facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Posts: 7
yes it's become clear that it's a 68mm english threaded bb and nothing else. someone over on the cervelo forum (was it perhaps you rmerka?) also wrote about the bsa bb allowing for a 3d+ crank. it's not the hollowgram and not superlight, but as far as consolation prices go, I'll take it.

Skickat från min GT-N7100 via Tapatalk 2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:49 am
Posts: 1253
For the price of an SiSL2 crankset you might be able to get an THM M3 cranks instead. It'll work with BSA and is lighter than Rotor. Take our host's offer, for example:http://www.starbike.com/en/thm-carbones-clavicula-m3/

_________________
RideWert.com
Wert Cycling on Facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Posts: 1519
Location: Houston, Texas
styrrell wrote:
Have you tried a sisl2 spindle with BBright and hollowgram crank arms? I'm just curious how much more spindle width is needed , if any , not worried about chainline.
Our bikes are BSA, BB30/PF30, and BB86 but I have no experience with BBright. Based on the outline in BikeRadar's article 'Complete guide to bottom brackets', on the drive side BBright and possibly BB386, is a true BB30 interface with no drive side offset and an 11mm longer spindle length. So at least in theory, it sounds to me like a longer Hollowgram spindle, one that has had the bearing ridge machined off - say the new 109mm hollowgram II spindle - might work with no ill effects but we will not know for certain until such time as someone gives it a shot.

Image

_________________
Michael - The Anaerobic Threshold is neither...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
If you could get that to work the NDS crank arm would be 11mm farther out from the centerline of the bike than the DS arm.

I think that would mess up ergonomics quite a bit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:54 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Posts: 1519
Location: Houston, Texas
eric wrote:
I think that would mess up ergonomics quite a bit.
Based on what I read about BBright, that seems a forgone conclusion regardless of the crank.

_________________
Michael - The Anaerobic Threshold is neither...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: raisinberry777, wheelsONfire, Yahoo [Bot] and 64 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Hollowgram SiSl with SRAM 22?

in Road

TerribleCadence

2

505

Wed Jan 15, 2014 7:49 am

TerribleCadence View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Hollowgram SiSL bond weakening?

in Road

hmai18

5

545

Sun May 04, 2014 2:44 am

hmai18 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cannondale SI / Hollowgram compat

in Road

HillRPete

4

340

Wed Jul 30, 2014 5:54 pm

topflightpro View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Weight of new cannondale hollowgram si crank.

in Road

NiFTY

0

818

Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:48 am

NiFTY View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cannondale Hollowgram Replacement Ideas

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

allenpg

18

1708

Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:44 am

oreoboreo View the latest post


It is currently Thu Jul 31, 2014 12:17 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB