HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 687 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 42, 43, 44, 45, 46
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 3:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 3778
Location: Bay Area
Definitely true^ I think the problem lies when people way overeat it, which it is easy to do, and then skimp on calories that provide energy.

Another point that is helpful to bring up is that saying arbitrarily that you need to hit a certain weight to be fast doesn't necessarily make a ton of sense. What you should focus more on is increasing power while decreasing bodyfat percentage unless you are riding pro level races with long 20-60min climbs. Cyclists can get very warped idea of size and weight. Sure, the climber types are definitely very thin, but a lot of really successful pro tour riders aren't actually as thin or as light as you'd think in person. Jumping down to the domestic level neither are a lot of those guys, however, a lot of them are really lean. Although he was on drugs, Lance is a great example as he was definitely heavier for his height some of the years that he won the Tour.

Its easy to become obsessed with the scale because it gives you a hard and fast number that you can comprehend, but in the end it could be a losing battle. I know that during a hard training block my weight can swing 4 lbs in just a day depending on water retention, glycogen levels, and even a bit of bloating after a really big ride on a hard day. A better solution has been to get a DEXA scan a few times a year to assess overall muscle and bodyfat levels. A scale can really prevent one from adopting healthy eating habits because it can also push them to keep pursuing drastic strategies when its not going down. I have a very good friend that is a high level domestic racer that goes through this every year. He tries to get below 155lbs, does one weird diet after another (no solid foods after a ride, 2,000cal deficits etc.), ends up not fulfilling his riding potential, then hits the off-season and stops dieting and his weight jumps back up to 165-170. He is already lean as hell and none of his races need him to weigh less, but he chases these numbers as if they're the key to success. I did for years as well and it definitely hurt more than it helped.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously.
Bike
Strava


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 3:32 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 3:43 pm 
Offline
Formerly known as wassertreter

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:08 am
Posts: 1944
Location: Pedal Square
This above post by KWalker should be made sticky on top of the thread.
Diet should only ever serve as a means to support the training (and facilitate better training), not an end in itself.

_________________
Bikes: Raw Ti, 650b flatbar CX


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 8:08 pm
Posts: 65
Location: Bremerton, WA
I too have chased weight with subpar results. It just isn't worth the decreased energy levels and unless you have a very high bodyfat %, you will probably lose a lot of strength with your weight. I find that if I eat when I'm hungry, stop when I'm full, and stick to a wholesome diet (minimal processed carbs, lean proteins, whole grains, veggies, etc.), my weight hovers slightly over what I'd consider "skinny bike racer", but I tend to be a lot stronger on the bike.

_________________
Moloko Plus 6.24 kg

"We haven't located us yet"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 6:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:35 pm
Posts: 55
Too much, 202lbs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 am
Posts: 2342
A year gone by, I shall quote myself... quoting myself.
Tapeworm wrote:
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=105601&p=903615#p903615" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Quote:
...Paradoxically, some cyclists don't eat enough to lose weight. They skimp on calories (and consequently nutrients) which means recovery is compromised and they can't train as hard. And because they don't train as hard they don't lose as much weight, so they eat less...

When you're training properly its a case of struggling to get the calories in. Prolonged, consistent training and diet can bring about the loss of muscle without much or any lose in power. But for most of us its not an immediately obtainable goal. Also not overlooking genetics. Some just won't have those ultra-dense fibres. That's is not to say improvement cannot be made but the "pro" look may not be there...


viewtopic.php?f=8&t=98834&start=45" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Quote:
If your power to weight ratio is less than 5 w/kgs then eat more, train harder and stop obsessing about inconsequential matters. Performance will lead to low body fat, not the other way round.

Diet should be done smart.

But here's a question. Are you training harder (quality) and eating "right" and seeing a significant rise in FTP and a reduction in body fat levels?

if not then answer could be to eat more.

I have seen plenty of cyclists get caught in the "losing weight paradox". They try to lose weight so they eat less, they can't train as hard, recover poorly, don't lose much weight, so they eat less, can't train as hard etc...

Then when they've killed their FTP they give up, eat "normal" and weight stacks on.

I prefer the path of train hard, eat well, recover, train harder, eat well etc. There maybe some net weight/fat gain. But I promise you someone with a 350watt FTP will lose weight easier than a 250watt FTP. Additional someone who has done the work to get to 350watts probably would have shed a bit on the way. Performance first and foremost.

If you get to 350watts and have a 20% body fat then yes, a bit of cutting will make you even better. Anything else is poser wankery. Like I said, if yall are worried about BF levels before you've got a decent engine you're all backwards...

_________________
"Physiology is all just propaganda and lies... all waiting to be disproven by the next study."
"I'm not a real doctor; But I am a real worm; I am an actual worm." - TMBG


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 1:05 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 7300
Location: Geeeelong!
Conversely, if everyone kept this in mind I'm certain racing would be a lot harder.

So I will extol the virtues of calorie deficits and over eating a given macronutrient.

_________________
http://www.nicksquillari.com.au Forum Jedi


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 4:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 4:21 pm
Posts: 25
Location: Estonia
35 yrs, 185cm, 67 kgs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 4:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:44 am
Posts: 1336
For the first 5 months of the season i ate 3 cookies everyday. I kinda made my lunch probably smaller to make room for those cookie calories, but it made me happy. Some days admittedly i felt a little weak at the knees, but 99% of the days i think i trained decently and was able to make some gainzzzzz. i raced early season 10 lbs lighter than what i raced at last season....and there were days i felt angelic climbing. I think seeing an all time weight low, got me nervous when i was racing later in the season and zomg i weighed 6 lbs more, but i think i still had fun and did well. So that was a good reminder weight doesn't make or break a race.

since the end of RR season, i told myself i wont step on the scale til next year after 2015 training has started lolol. I got sick of those 3 cookies (madelines), and now im doing donuts with icecream for dessert instead.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 6:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:56 pm
Posts: 710
drainyoo wrote:
35 years
6ft/182cm
208lb/94kg

Trying to burn off the daddy fat and get down to 190lb.


I'm down to 200lbs/90kg. Getting there, slowly.

_________________
6.24kg CAAD10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:20 pm
Posts: 41
Location: Vienna
Excellent news.
Around these parts, a packet of butter is 250g. Maybe where you are it's an 8oz packet?
Remember, butter is very similar to adipose tissue in colour and form.
Next time you are at the supermarket, just stack up sixteen packets of butter and puff out your chest a little.

Keep it up, sir


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 5:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 7:40 am
Posts: 8
30 years old, 1.87m, 67kg.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:01 am
Posts: 35
44 years, 1.85cm and 78-82 kg :)

_________________
Canyon CF SLX DA Di2 2014, LW Meilenstein C, 6,0kg
Canyon Aeroad DA Di2 2012, LW III, 6,8kg
Grand Canyon CF DA Di2 2012 650B, 9,5kg
Canyon Speedmax DA Di2 2010, Zipp 808/Disk


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 687 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 42, 43, 44, 45, 46


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Stem-Bars Weighing. Shimano Pro Vibe and Carbon Bars

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

Zigmeister

15

1670

Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:06 pm

Zigmeister View the latest post


It is currently Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:47 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB