HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 220 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:54 am
Posts: 107
Location: Denmark
Feedback time Beatnik :beerchug:

I found your spreadsheet when I was building up a new bike and I used the guidlines in the spreadsheet when ordering the frame and setting up the bike. I have now done 1000 km on the new bike, and the fit feels amazing! The only things I have changed from the data in the spreadsheet is to lower the seat 5-7 mm and move it 7-8 mm forward. The changes made based on my feeling on the bike.

Today I went to the LBS to have my fit checked according to their body-scanner. They were scratching their heads because they had never seen a bike set-up so well by someone not having access to some ''pro set-up tools''. According to their measurements my seat is 2,1 mm to high, and the seat is 1,5 mm to far back. Everything else within ''measurement errors''. You can actually say that the mentioned measurements for the seat is also within measurement errors, but I mention them here to indicate that the fit is spot on.

Thanks for the excellent spreatsheet. Without it I would have bougt a frame one size to big, ordered 172,5 mm crank arms instead of 175 mm and I would never had gotten such a nice fit without the guidlines :thumbup:

PS... I'm glad that I could participate (you now use a picture of my arm in the spreadsheet) :wink:

Cheers,
Morten

_________________
My BMC SLR01 Team Machine: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=75502


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:58 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:55 am
Posts: 8
Location: Switzerland
Hi beatnik,

great spreadsheet ... it helps a lot :thumbup:

What reach of the bar you consider in your calculation? I'm using a compact bar with a reach of only 72mm, so I ended up with 10mm longer stem as proposed in your calculation.

Regards, Regge

_________________
09 Pinarello Prince
05 Time VX Edge
03 Canyon MR8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:08 am
Posts: 66
i'll try this one :thumbup:

_________________
"Invest in the frame which will last a lifetime, play with the components to keep it fresh and to meet your weight needs." Darren Crisp


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:38 pm
Posts: 1228
Thx for your feedback. :up:

_________________
Biomechanical spreadsheet. Sizing&Fitting.

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 8e319d185b


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 8:33 pm
Posts: 19
Beatnik,

Thanks for all your work. It's very interesting, and quite some distance from where I currently am. I am going to give this a go and move towards the suggestions. It seems my custom fit frame was made with a very slack seat angle, and probably for good reason (72.5 degrees I think), so I can't get very close to the seat to bottom bracket setback (Still +2cm), but then my femurs are very long. So it's all a matter of compromise. Whilst the changes will certainly enable me to move forward and down, which I think will be a good thing.

I'm in the process of getting a new race bike so it's time to try things out before I buy. I'm going for a fitting later this week so I now have another set for reference.

:beerchug: Cheers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 5:06 am
Posts: 507
This is a really good calculator. It repeated my current fit (tt + stem) within 1cm but with much less drop (which probably accounts for the 1cm of extra stem given).

I am curious, is there a specific seat tube angle that is assumed? I broke out the trig and gave up trying to figure it out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:38 pm
Posts: 1228
Bigger Seat tube angles means only more setback and longer effective T.T., better handling and nothing else. Most important thing is to fit the bike acording to your body. Nevertheless bike handling will be different but if your bike is well fitted, you will avoid muscle stress, you will have more power and less fatigue.

_________________
Biomechanical spreadsheet. Sizing&Fitting.

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 8e319d185b


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:46 pm
Posts: 279
Location: Paradise City
Hey erm.. i came across this while searching for some bikefitting help. The link is however broken. Can i get it somewhere else or... ?!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 5:39 pm
Posts: 515
Location: Tropical Wales
Hi,

I am very interested in bike fit as I have recurring medial knee pain.

Clearly there are lots of factors affecting a good fit and lots of balancing of these factors in order to get the best fit for an individual.

My question is this: What are the overall biomechanical goals of the correct bike fit (for me this would mainly be in relation to comfort rather than performance)? Forget frame lengths, saddle setback and so on, what are we trying to acheive in terms biomechanics?

For example what are the kinematics and kinetics of the lower limbs that are desired and where do these values come from? References? A knee flexion angle of 150-155 degress has been mentioned here for example, but how about internal/ external rotation of the knee, ankle and hip motion, joint moments within the hip, knee and ankle etc...

I realise accurate kinetics and kinematics can not be checked by eye but that is the benefit of have access to skin marker based motion analysis and fluroscopy amongst other little goodies :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:38 pm
Posts: 1228
x Danw Buy Qrings is the best advice for you and your knee.

Link is working ;)

_________________
Biomechanical spreadsheet. Sizing&Fitting.

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 8e319d185b


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:04 pm
Posts: 196
This certainly seems really accurate and thanks for you're work on it! I'm just confused as to how it can have so few measurements for your body? Am I missing something, or can this really be done with only the inseame and forearm, plus flexibility??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:38 pm
Posts: 1228
I have another version that includes torso length as critical measure (See the graphic below). But it´s not easy to measure correctly you must find the top of your ilium and measure perfectly vertical till the top of your clavicle, and yes,you need another person and a taylor meter, or for sure you go wrong.

If you take your measure correctly you will find that in most of the cases that measure is identical than your inseam perhaps one or two cm. up or down. Once you have torso length m. you need a complicate calculation, with angles, sine and cosine in order to find the perfect angle for your torso. And you must install some other excel trigonometric module and...you know it´s more difficult than v8 datasheet for any language.

From the practical point of view, this formula could be simplificated as this

(Put this measure as you inseam in datasheet)

Virtual Inseam Length = ((102/100)*(Real Inseam length-((Torso length-Real Inseam Length))/2))

Is not exactly because is not trigonometric, but works. And perhaps must be included, in order to obtain more accurate results, nevertheless i´m pretty satisfied with v8 because is as easy as it can be and give very good results. Sometimes "perfect" and "very good" are big enemies ;). Greetings and thx for your feedback.


Attachments:
SKELETON.JPG
SKELETON.JPG [ 62.08 KiB | Viewed 2075 times ]

_________________
Biomechanical spreadsheet. Sizing&Fitting.

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 8e319d185b
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:04 pm
Posts: 196
Thanks for the response, I'm really impressed by your work!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:38 pm
Posts: 1228
Somebody asks me how to put the correct measurements

Image

_________________
Biomechanical spreadsheet. Sizing&Fitting.

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 8e319d185b


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 172
Which way is most accurate to measure your inseam?


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:47 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 220 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Road or MTB helmet version : any differences ?

in Road

LouisN

3

390

Fri Feb 07, 2014 3:53 pm

project3 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Trek Domane alloy version 2.3 weight?

in Road

hjb1000

9

1285

Thu Feb 13, 2014 11:08 am

MajorMantra View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. S-Works Crank - MTB version fit road BSA + Lightning compat

in Road

BikeTart

5

692

Sun Nov 17, 2013 6:47 pm

bricky21 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Lynskey Cooper CX cant version; tyre clearance and fork?

in Cyclocross / Touring

Nopea

0

483

Tue Sep 03, 2013 10:14 pm

Nopea View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Fitting mechanical to a Di2 frame

in Road

CIANSUTCLIFFE

6

709

Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:41 pm

SuperDave View the latest post


It is currently Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:47 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB