HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 10:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:10 am
Posts: 5
I'm 5' 7" with short legs and currently riding a Giant with a 53.5 cm eff top tube, 13.5 cm head tube, 73.5 seat tube angle and a 90mm stem. I'm currently looking at a Van Dessel G & T. Not sure whether to go with the Size 50 with the 52 cm eff top tube and 10 cm head tube, or the Size 52 with the 53.5 cm eff top tube and 12 cm head tube; both size Van Dessels have 75 degree seat tube angles. Any suggestions would be appreciated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:48 pm
Posts: 233
Location: The Netherlands
I think you will be sitting much forward with 75 degree seat tube angle. In that case I'm not sure it's a good idea going for a shorter top tube length. Personally I don't like riding bikes with different seat tube angle, that's the only thing I wouldn't change on my bikes


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:01 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:37 am
Posts: 431
Location: Colorado
I believe I am similar to you in size. I ride a 52 Full Tilt. It fits me perfectly with a 90 stem.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:46 pm
Posts: 31
Location: belgium
I like to ride with a shorter crossframe then roadframe. My stem is also 1 cm shorter and bars are about 1 cm higher then roadbike.

Why they make a crossbike with a 75 seatangle is abit off a misteru to me because you should be able to lift your front more and this is easier with more weight on the rear...
If you buy one off these frames , I would take a seatpost with enough setback so you can sit at least as far back as on your roadbike..

If you follow my reasoning , I guess it would be normal to take the smaller size frame.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. I want a cross bike

in Cyclocross / Touring

boots2000

0

468

Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:54 am

boots2000 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. cross bike as temporary mtg?

in Cyclocross / Touring

Kevin3182

1

277

Thu May 08, 2014 8:46 am

mattr View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. New cross bike fit question

in Cyclocross / Touring

LittleSprinter

10

758

Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:51 pm

JBV View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Colnago Dream Cross cyclocross bike

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

SWijland

16

2129

Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:02 pm

nobrakes71 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) 48cm 2013 Cannondale SuperX Ultegra Cross Bike

in For sale - Pictures are mandatory 22-3-13

mtnbkr

0

245

Mon Jun 23, 2014 2:01 pm

mtnbkr View the latest post


It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:07 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB