Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:32 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2013 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Posts: 1818
Location: Houston, Texas
Not sure I understand how the UCI could rule against the stays, but I do see a problem with the stays being that low and wide canti brake arms possibly catching the back of the riders leg during dismounts or for out of the saddle efforts.

_________________
Michael - The Anaerobic Threshold is neither...


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2013 8:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:20 pm
Posts: 1611
Location: New Zealand
gt5504b wrote:
dereksmalls wrote:
I heard somewhere that the seat stay configuration above wasn't allowed in UCI races? Is that true? Anyone know?


What about the stays could be disallowed by the UCI? Is it too narrow in one direction?


Yeah not sure. I haven't read through the rule book to see if it mentions anything that in CS the satys must come from higher up the seat tube like a normal designed frame shape. Then again the Giant TCX has much the same shape in the seat stays, albeit a bit higher up the seat tube so I think someone was telling me the wring info there

Image

_________________
2012 BMC SLR 6.02kg http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=110390


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 4:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 3:48 am
Posts: 1428
AFAIK the rule is one that's applied to TT bikes most often.

I think the rule is roughly something that says the stays must make contact with the seat tube pretty much no lower than the height of the rear wheel.

Seeing as BMC do this on most of their frames, I can't see it being an issue.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Selecting between an Aero Road bike vs a Time Trial bike?

in Road

THUNDERHORSE

6

852

Fri Jun 10, 2016 1:04 am

pdlpsher1 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Bike wall mount/bike rooms

in Cycle Chat

Bely

6

879

Sat Aug 15, 2015 6:08 am

Bely View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. what bike do you like best

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

greenplay

18

1811

Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:35 pm

greenplay View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 3 X 9 XTR to 1 X 11 XT = Heavier Bike

in MTB

wilberforce

14

1626

Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:12 pm

wilberforce View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Next chain for my bike

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

TomColnago

17

1708

Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:40 am

froze View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited