Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Thu Jun 30, 2016 6:53 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 10:55 pm
Posts: 3
Anyone know the weight of the Shimano Hollowtech II FC-4603 or FC-5703 triples?

FC-6603 is supposed to be 892g but does that include bottom bracket or not?

Any other options to consider for a lightish triple crankset?


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:32 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 2568
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
Campag cranksets are normally lighter than shimano one. For example my Veloce chainset +BB is lighter than my 6600 standard + BB. Thge same may be true for Campags new triple chainset.

_________________
www.thecycleclinic.co.uk


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:19 am
Posts: 60
The new campagnolo triples include an athena 11speed triple that has carbon crank arms. Powertorque BB. I'd be surprised if that isn't going to be lighter than all the shimano offerings. They all are meant to have the lowest Q factors available in road triples.

Apparently they use hollow technology in their aluminium crank arms, so they might come in quite light too. I'm thinking of getting the centaur version for myself, I might change some of the ratios I want with TA crank rings.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:23 am
Posts: 655
Location: so. cal.
i believe lightning has a triple spider option, they cost a good amount, but they might be the lightest triple.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 1:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:19 am
Posts: 60
Is the llightning triple a mountain bike triple only? As in, 64/104 BCD?


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:23 am
Posts: 655
Location: so. cal.
if you look at their website, they advertised a 130X74 road triple. they offer this along the 110, 130 and 94 bcd.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 6:33 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 8:17 am
Posts: 6328
Location: Drenthe, Holland
It seems you are set on a triple crank, but if you are not hindered by physical problems, please also have a look at compact cranks. Paired with the right cassette they offer about the same gearing ratios without the downfalls of a triple.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

_________________
Quote:
'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 3699
Location: HULLGARIA UK
Agree with Frankie. I did a spreadsheet a few years ago when I switched from triple to compact. The range of gears was almost the same with the compact, except that with the triple there were quite a few gears were wasted as they were so close together as to make no difference. I have a compact with 48/33 rings and a 12/27 cassette. Even for my old legs it's enough.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 8:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:49 pm
Posts: 1590
Location: Near Horgen, Switzerland
Unless you ride a tandem. Then I would go for a triple unless you are either both extremely fit or live in Florida.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 10:55 pm
Posts: 3
The question was about weights of various triple cranksets. Not about peoples preferences to compacts or triples!


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:25 am
Posts: 1293
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Stronglight Fission Triple is about the best road-specific triple on the market - carbon cranks with a titanium axle. And you have the option of steel or ceramic bearings. It is traditional 110/74 BCD so lots of chainrings to choose from.

Yes there are lots of MTB triples, but these of course come with MTB chainlines.

Yes Campag triples are good, but they are not 110/74 BCD. Mr Campagnolo has not kind of worked out that triple uses generally want small chainrings.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:26 pm
Posts: 2529
Some of us want maximum range for the mountains. I used a 53/39/28 for a number of years, riding exclusively in the Colorado mountains. Worked great, with a 12-25 cassette. Today, I'd choose an 11-25, 11 speed.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 11:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:29 am
Posts: 373
Frankie - B wrote:
It seems you are set on a triple crank, but if you are not hindered by physical problems, please also have a look at compact cranks. Paired with the right cassette they offer about the same gearing ratios without the downfalls of a triple.

DaveS wrote:
Some of us want maximum range for the mountains. I used a 53/39/28 for a number of years, riding exclusively in the Colorado mountains. Worked great, with a 12-25 cassette. Today, I'd choose an 11-25, 11 speed.

Yes, a 50/34 or 52/34 compact crank can be used with an 11-34 10spd cassette, using an M772 or M972 MTB RD, and actually provide more range than a 53/39/28 triple and 12-25 cassette :-)


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 1:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:19 am
Posts: 60
Yes, but with very wide gear spacing. Sometimes its nice on long rides to be able to ride with closer gear spacings, at the cadence you want. Plenty of times I'd pick that option over a slight decrease in weight...much more efficient in the long run.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 3:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 12:19 am
Posts: 79
pow216 wrote:
The question was about weights of various triple cranksets. Not about peoples preferences to compacts or triples!


As a former triple user and someone who mainly rides in the mountains, let me suggest one other option. Get a compact crankset and replace the 34t ring with a 33t ring (available from TA Specialites). Pair that with an 11-28 rear cassette and you very nearly have the same low gearing and gear range as a triple. I have this setup on my bike with a D/A 7900 drivetrain. It shifts beautifully front and back, and is WAY lighter than any triple setup. It's actually lighter than a normal 7900 drivetrain with an 11-28 cassette, since the 33t ring is lighter than a 34t ring.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. light weight wonders?

in Road

Memphis

10

1177

Wed Feb 17, 2016 11:23 pm

zev View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Light weight 25.4mm post with setback

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

logy

19

638

Sat Apr 16, 2016 11:22 pm

prendrefeu View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Any light weight square [ ] shape stems ?

in Road

KarlC

6

890

Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:55 am

mvacolnago View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Light weight fast rolling hubs

in Road

oreoboreo

6

783

Wed Jan 06, 2016 5:00 pm

oreoboreo View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Light weight, gloss white, carbon finishing kit for C60

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

greentimgreen

16

1506

Fri Oct 02, 2015 2:45 am

RyanH View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bogdanescu, CPongpanich, FourthWall, Google [Bot], HammerTime2, jeffy, Liol, mpetersrx7 and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited