Cervelo R3 vs Lynskey Sportive

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
User avatar
Kastrup
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:00 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

by Kastrup

Even though i didn't receive much help in my previous attempt to narrow my choices down to just one, i have now decided to try again but this time with just two contenders.

As the title states, i am on the lookout for a new frame to replace my 2008 Neo Exile. It has served me well but the coming season will see me attempt some of the very long and demanding Randonees such as Oslo-Trondheim, Ötztaler Rad Marathon and the PR and RvV sportives. I might keep the Neo as my criterium and faul weather bike so i am really looking for a bike suited for longer distances.

Firstly, frame material.
- Carbon, if laid up correctly, will give me all the things i need in order to complete these races. It'll be plenty stiff, light and will handle the rough surfaces of the spring classics with no problem if specced correctly. The only downside is that carbon won't be as crash and dent resilient as titanium. And as this is a bike that will travel a lot in the back of various vans, this might become a huge problem. And maybe not...
- Titanium combines the best of both worlds in my humble opinion. Crash and dent resistent, light and plenty stiff. It also has the well known titanium durability and ridefeel.

Spec
The Cervelo will be bought used and comes with the following items:
- Cervelo R3: Standard Cervelo fork, Cane Creek Headset and a 3t carbon seatpost, Rotor BBright to BSA BB.

The Lynskey will be bought brand new and so will the other parts.
- Lynskey Sportive: 3T Funda fork, CK headset, no seatpost.

Price

I can get the Cervelo for about 1800 USD. The Lynskey will be about 2400 USD.

Final decision

What will it be? The Lynskey is obviously going to be perfect for the PR and RvV because of it's ability to run 28 mm tyres. However it will significantly more expensive than the R3 which will be a lot lighter. And even though i probably can't run 28 mm tyres it is still going to be quite smooth with some nice 25 mm tyres.
I have tried to put together a list of pros and cons.

R3
-Pros:
Carbon frame
Cheaper then Lynskey
Replaceable dropout
Lighter
Stiffer?
-Cons:
Carbon frame
No 28 mm tyres
Won't enable me to completely build the bike myself as it comes assembled


Lynskey
Pros:
Titanium frame
Smooth and comfortable ( more or less than the R3?)
Durable
28 mm tyres
Self build
-Cons:
Heavyish
Expensive (when compared to the R3)
No replaceable dropout
Not as swift and responsive as the R3?

What does WW think? (other frame suggestions are welcome)
Last edited by Kastrup on Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:40 pm, edited 5 times in total.
"Stay cool and try to survive" A. Klier to the other members of the Garmin classics squad the night before P-R.

User avatar
Kastrup
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:00 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

by Kastrup

Obviously you are more than welcome to share your thoughts on the frames that i have already looked at.
"Stay cool and try to survive" A. Klier to the other members of the Garmin classics squad the night before P-R.

by Weenie


andyindo
Posts: 395
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 10:03 am

by andyindo

If you want to go steel there are a host of VERY good steel builders. Also modern steel is not that heavy. Wheels will make a much bigger difference on weight that an extra 300grams on a frame.

Look at Hampsten bikes, DeSalvo, Enigma(UK)

There are many more as well and that will be a beautiful bike that can last a lifetime.
OR, you could look for a 2nd hand Colnago C40. Would be very comfortable, especially for those longer sportives. Also a classic frame and it doesnt give too much away to the newer carbon frames IMO.

Ti is nice but its expensive.

User avatar
Kastrup
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:00 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

by Kastrup

Thank you for the advice Andyindo... I'll look into those builders :)

And gosh, 122 views and 1 reply? Seems that i've set myself a harder challenge than expected :evil:
"Stay cool and try to survive" A. Klier to the other members of the Garmin classics squad the night before P-R.

User avatar
Kastrup
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:00 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

by Kastrup

I have now narrowed down the frame choices to just two.
"Stay cool and try to survive" A. Klier to the other members of the Garmin classics squad the night before P-R.

bikedoc
Posts: 642
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:16 pm

by bikedoc

Lynskey, great bike and will stand up to be packed up and transported around so much better than the R3.

justkeepedaling
Posts: 1340
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:14 am
Location: by Crystal Springs (Sawyer Creek Trail)

by justkeepedaling

The R3 will take a pounding, just like the Lynskey. It will be way more responsive and stiffer.

Fontana
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:56 pm

by Fontana

Lynskey is art, Cervelo "only" a bike...

MARLON
Posts: 1227
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:59 am

by MARLON

Fontana wrote:Lynskey is art, Cervelo "only" a bike...


Only a Bike which Is a pure Race machine !

I own a R5, Ride R3 & The California this year.

All The Bikes has The Same charakteristic.

Stiff in The bB area and Front , ver comfy and a very Good agility.
The only differnce are The Weights!

So go and Ride your Art toy
BACK IN BLACK

campbellrae
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:20 am
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

by campbellrae

As mentioned above, some of Enigma's stuff is very very nice, and for the sort of money that you are looking at you could probably get a nice custom steel frame. That is if you don't mind the weight penalty. On the other hand, Lynskey frames are pretty special as well!

petepeterson
Posts: 1391
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:58 am
Location: 604

by petepeterson

Image

User avatar
prendrefeu
Posts: 8577
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California
Contact:

by prendrefeu

Describe your randonees: will they have pit-stop or support, or are they self-supported?
Exp001 || Other projects in the works.

bikedoc
Posts: 642
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:16 pm

by bikedoc

justkeepedaling wrote:The R3 will take a pounding, just like the Lynskey. It will be way more responsive and stiffer.

you must be joking, after 6months of use they look 6years old, light they might be , stiff is questionable, race machine only if you can bin it after a season, durable definatly not

theres a few carbon bikes i would feel happy with if i had to do a lot of travelling with them but not a cervelo

User avatar
djconnel
Posts: 7926
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

by djconnel

Definitely the Lynskey. The stiffness of the Cervelo will be wasted on rides like this, and you'll still pay the comfort penalty.

by Weenie


User avatar
prendrefeu
Posts: 8577
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California
Contact:

by prendrefeu

I also favour the Lynskey per your criteria.
Exp001 || Other projects in the works.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post