HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 01, 2015 3:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 8:15 pm
Posts: 53
Hello,
I am considering buying a Storck Scentron G1 frame and while trying to figure out the right size I got stuck due to what seems to be strange reach vs Effective TT lengths.
I need to chose between the size 47 and 51 frames and these are the Effective TT and Reach values for these two sizes according to Storck's catalog (see attached image):

Size: 47 Eff TT : 524 mm Reach: 387 mm
Size: 51 Eff TT : 548 mm Reach: 378 mm

Maybe I am missing something here, however this seems counter intuitive to me.

Also upon checking the sizing for other Storck bikes (Fenomalist, Aernario, Fascenario) the smaller bikes always has the shorter Eff TT and shorter reach.

Is this a printing mistake in the catalog or maybe the Scentron frames have a strange geometry?

Many thanks for your help.
Kind regards,
Jano


Attachments:
Storck Scentron sizing.jpg
Storck Scentron sizing.jpg [ 124.85 KiB | Viewed 455 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 11:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 11:15 am
Posts: 26
If you plan on getting a Storck, why not get a fitting session to help to decide on the sizing?
Stock dimensions rarely work and although it might seem weird, a few millimeters here, a centimeter there really can make all the difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 11:21 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 11:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 8:15 pm
Posts: 53
Hi Jaroslaw,
Thanks for your kind reply.
The issue is there is no Storck dealer around here, even those mentioned on their site do not have the frames available.
All I have left is to compare the geometries of the two bikes and when I try this, the reach and Effective TT do not make sense.
I am trying to get an answer from a dealer, maybe they mixed the reach values between the 47cm and 51cm size frames.
Kind regards,
Jano


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 12:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:36 am
Posts: 1202
Location: UK
A quick search shows that the geometry was the same in 2012 so I don't think it's a typo. Also other models have similar differences between the 47 & 50 sizes.

The 47 has a much steeper seat angle (75deg) versus the 50 (74). This accounts for a big chunk of the reach difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 8:15 pm
Posts: 53
Hi 585,
Thanks for taking time to research the sizing for the Scentron, indeed they use the same sizing since 2012 when it was launched.
The issue I have is that the 1 degree difference in the Seat Tube angle can not make up that difference in reach, especially when you consider the Effective TT length difference of 24 mm.

I did try to draft both of the frame geometries in 2D, and this is what I get (dimensions are in centimeters):

Image

Maybe I am making a mistake somewhere, please bear with me on this one, I really want to make sure I chose the right frame.
I am 168 cm tall and according to Storck the 47 size is for up to 167 cm, while the 51 size is for 165 to 172 cm tall riders.
Right now I am riding a Litespeed Ghisallo, size M, which might be a tad to big, and my issue is to chose the right size Scentron frame, I am however not sure how they got to those reach values they mention for the two frame sizes.

Thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:58 pm 
Offline
Resident Pro

Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2003 9:42 pm
Posts: 2102
it is not a mistake. go with the effective top tube length. storcks have longer effective top tubes than any other brand i know for small frames, so you can go with a shorter stem and/or a sweeping bar like the MCFK.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 10:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 8:15 pm
Posts: 53
Thanks Mike,
I guess I'll go with the 47 then, the 524 mm Effective TT would allow me a more aggressive stance, and if needed I can always use a slightly longer stem.
Let's see how it goes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 4:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:36 am
Posts: 1202
Location: UK
jano, on your 51 drawing, the Seat tube should be 50.

Here's a pic showing the geo. The ETT is to the centre of the TT / Headtube and not the top of the headtube (stack and reach).
Image

There isn't enough info to draw it properly. It would be useful to have the BB drop etc.

BTW I believe Storck forks are longer than standard (380 versus 368/370). Not sure if this is important.
Scott do the same and I got caught out because it wasn't on the geo chart.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 9:13 pm 
Offline
Resident Pro

Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2003 9:42 pm
Posts: 2102
you made the right choice. you will be pleased. I especially like the horizontal dropouts so you wont lose your wheel slipping.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 9:13 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], ElMacho, Google Adsense [Bot], HakeemT, troydupe and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Am I understanding this BB90 stuff correctly?

in Road

jspaceman

5

930

Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:44 pm

FIJIGabe View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Mavic shoes sizing

in Road

drainyoo

4

523

Fri Jun 06, 2014 10:52 pm

bikerjulio View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. lake shoe sizing vs. s-works

in Road

sungod

1

485

Sun Aug 10, 2014 1:11 pm

thasle View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Sidi Wire half sizing

in Road

windsurfingodie

11

1084

Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:36 pm

UncleJamsArmy View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Bont and Shimano shoe sizing

in Road

coneill0422

13

991

Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:59 pm

mdeth1313 View the latest post


It is currently Mon Mar 30, 2015 12:52 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB