Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Sat Jul 30, 2016 12:35 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 465 posts ]  Go to page Previous 13 4 5 6 731 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:37 am
Posts: 5751
Location: Phoenix Arizona
:lol:

If I opened a wheel company and the concern with my 1080 gram 60-66mm Deep wheels was the viability of the White Industries Hub parts, I would guess I'de hit a home run...

_________________
charles@pezcyclingnews.com


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:24 pm
Posts: 4438
Location: BELGIUM
If I were to open a wheel company and would be concerned about the viability of the White Industries Hub parts of my 1080 gram 60-66mm deep wheels, I would guess I would be worried too... :lol:


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:37 am
Posts: 5751
Location: Phoenix Arizona
about what?

_________________
charles@pezcyclingnews.com


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Posts: 2643
Mario Jr. wrote:
11.4 wrote:

Lightweight uses DT in all wheels.



Not true... they use Tune as an option in their lighter wheels.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:38 am
Posts: 649
Location: Vancouver, BC
PezTech wrote:
:lol:

If I opened a wheel company and the concern with my 1080 gram 60-66mm Deep wheels was the viability of the White Industries Hub parts, I would guess I'de hit a home run...


Kind of true, but I feel that there are so many unanswered questions. The biggest one for me, is how they were able to make a 60-66 mm deep rim with so little carbon? The wheels are so light that they must be using less material. Weight savings in the spokes, true but that's another concern. Why will these spokes *not* be susceptible to catastrophic failure a la R-SYS? Every safe design I've seen incorporates kevlar strands to prevent a broken spoke from disintegrating.

And lastly, considering the design rules that have been violated (flat spokes, v-shaped rim, etc) why wouldn't these perform worse aerodynamically than other well-proven and measured designs?

From my perspective, we only know three facts about these wheels: how they look; how much they cost; how much they weigh. A couple of test rides won't be adequate to answer all the other unknowns.

John Swanson

_________________
www.bikephysics.com
www.lanternart.com


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:04 am 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:47 pm
Posts: 98
xnavalav8r wrote:
Mario Jr. wrote:
11.4 wrote:
Lightweight uses DT in all wheels.

Not true... they use Tune as an option in their lighter wheels.


No longer.
We stopped using TUNE ~03/2008! and switched to DT Swiss 190 Ceramic for Obermayer and Ventoux 190.

_________________
Andreas Schiwy, CarbonSports GmbH
http://www.lightweight.info
support[at]lightweight.info


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:24 pm
Posts: 4438
Location: BELGIUM
PezTech wrote:
about what?

about the fact that it would be a concern, which it isn't. just saying those hubs are fine.. must be my poor english.. :D


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 1:38 pm
Posts: 22
Location: Tampa, FL
ScienceIsCool wrote:
PezTech wrote:
:lol:

If I opened a wheel company and the concern with my 1080 gram 60-66mm Deep wheels was the viability of the White Industries Hub parts, I would guess I'de hit a home run...


Kind of true, but I feel that there are so many unanswered questions. The biggest one for me, is how they were able to make a 60-66 mm deep rim with so little carbon? The wheels are so light that they must be using less material. Weight savings in the spokes, true but that's another concern. Why will these spokes *not* be susceptible to catastrophic failure a la R-SYS? Every safe design I've seen incorporates kevlar strands to prevent a broken spoke from disintegrating.

And lastly, considering the design rules that have been violated (flat spokes, v-shaped rim, etc) why wouldn't these perform worse aerodynamically than other well-proven and measured designs?

From my perspective, we only know three facts about these wheels: how they look; how much they cost; how much they weigh. A couple of test rides won't be adequate to answer all the other unknowns.

John Swanson


First, traditional carbon rims have more material to prevent spokes from pulling through the rim, with Mad Fibers method of attachment, this is less of an issue so that they can use less material.

Second, R-Sys type failures aren't an issue, as Mad Fiber spokes are loaded only in tension, where as the R-sys spokes are like wagon wheels with the spoke subject to tension and compression.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 5:27 pm
Posts: 595
Also, many of the strength and weight gains come from improved carbon processes, allowing a higher ratio of carbon to resin in finished product.

_________________
Don't be alarmed.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:37 am
Posts: 5751
Location: Phoenix Arizona
strobbekoen wrote:
PezTech wrote:
about what?

about the fact that it would be a concern, which it isn't. just saying those hubs are fine.. must be my poor english.. :D


Have you seen how bad I write? How would I know if you had poor english!? :beerchug:

_________________
charles@pezcyclingnews.com


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 3:27 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:35 pm
Posts: 1429
Location: Toronto, Canada
Mine are going great thus far.
Very stiff, quite stable in cross-winds, nice ride quality.
No complaints.
Though they do sound a little "hollow" when going over major ruts and RR tracks, they've held up perfectly.
Just need to get them on a bike that fits me better :roll:
Image

_________________
Blacksmith Cycle - bespoke bicycles - info@blacksmithcycle.com
Website: http://www.blacksmithcycle.com
Stage-Race Distribution - the world's finest bicycles
Website: http://www.stage-race.com


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:38 am
Posts: 649
Location: Vancouver, BC
Tibber67 wrote:
First, traditional carbon rims have more material to prevent spokes from pulling through the rim, with Mad Fibers method of attachment, this is less of an issue so that they can use less material.

Second, R-Sys type failures aren't an issue, as Mad Fiber spokes are loaded only in tension, where as the R-sys spokes are like wagon wheels with the spoke subject to tension and compression.


In my first round of questions, I made the point that this method of attachment (a narrow aspect ratio cut through the sidewall and sidewall loading) is so different that it's unknown what stresses there are on the sidewall absent any modelling and testing. Has this been done? You sure that this requires less material than a standard spoke bed?

And I haven't seen any tension numbers on the spokes. You sure they never experience near complete detensioning during normal loads? And complete destruction of the spoke will happen under tension or compression anyways. That is why every commercially available wheel with carbon fiber spokes is also reinforced with kevlar strands.

I'm sorry everyone for my severe skepticism. The whole scenario reminds me too much of LEW. Supposedly some guys with aerospace experience can use less material than anyone else, use questionable engineering, charge a mint and somehow make a superior product.

I'm not saying it's *impossible*, just that when you go against well established engineering principles you shouldn't be surprised when people call you on it. Actual numbers and test data should be a minimum if you're going to ask people to believe you.

John Swanson

_________________
www.bikephysics.com
www.lanternart.com


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:24 pm
Posts: 4438
Location: BELGIUM
As for the way the spokes are attached to the rim, that is quite similar to the way carbonsports does it no ? Except here the spoke enters the rim a bit higher up while on Lightweights the spokes from each side of the hub cross in a X shape but are also bonded along the side of the rim. Either way, it would make sense you need less material as compared to wheels with standard spokes since the force of the tension of the spokes on these works on a really small surface area.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Posts: 2643
CarbonSportsGmbH wrote:
xnavalav8r wrote:
Mario Jr. wrote:
11.4 wrote:
Lightweight uses DT in all wheels.

Not true... they use Tune as an option in their lighter wheels.


No longer.
We stopped using TUNE ~03/2008! and switched to DT Swiss 190 Ceramic for Obermayer and Ventoux 190.



I stand corrected. :noidea:


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 9:53 pm
Posts: 144
ScienceIsCool wrote:
And lastly, considering the design rules that have been violated (flat spokes, v-shaped rim, etc) why wouldn't these perform worse aerodynamically than other well-proven and measured designs?

You put this last but I actually think it should go first. If the rim is really v-shaped then I would want to see some wind tunnel figures before spending any money.

_________________
CLB


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 465 posts ]  Go to page Previous 13 4 5 6 731 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Carbon Frame & AL Wheels Vs Quality AL Frame & Carbon Wheels

in Road

jeffy

13

1157

Wed May 04, 2016 4:33 pm

KimJaeCheon View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Which wheels for Dogma F8?

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 ]

in Everything wheels

TheGoldenGreek

55

2583

Tue Apr 12, 2016 1:28 am

caballero View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Alchemist wheels,... anyone?

in Cyclocross / Gravel / Touring

wheelsONfire

0

261

Sat Jan 09, 2016 8:06 pm

wheelsONfire View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. How many wheels do you have per bike?

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 ]

in Road

skiezo

48

2315

Thu Feb 18, 2016 2:39 am

FMB51 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. New wheels for Oltre

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

hanzo111

15

1353

Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:48 pm

zappafile123 View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited