Page 2 of 3

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 5:57 pm
by PDXWheels
I believe the 4000 RS is a Germany only, tire. The marketing was something along the lines of giving German riders an advantage nobody else has. It was very limited production.

If you need an ultra-light Conti, the Supersonic is widely available. If you ask me, even a 175g 4000 is still going to be outperformed by the 195g Michelin Pro3.

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 5:57 pm
by Weenie

Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:05 pm
by rruff
Frankie - B wrote:the RS is just an R with a thinner thread.


And the SS has the same casing as the 4000, only without the puncture layer, and the tread is thinner. I've had no issues with the SS in a few hundred miles of riding.

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:38 pm
by Yiannis-Super 6.
Supersonic works great for me-front only though.

Re:

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:29 am
by aeroslave
rruff wrote:
Stats wrote: Expected wear (life) is approx half the GP4000S


IMO this is a no brainer and I'm surprised that more companies don't do this. Just make the tread half as thick and sell twice as many tires...



The Ultremo Rs are already that...1/10th the life of any racing tyre buwahahahaha

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:51 am
by SLight
Tour has done another clincher vs. tubular test and the GP4000RS clincher wins (of course... test are done @ continental)
and again, no latex innertubes used

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:48 pm
by ODT
Downloaded that test yesterday and I think the result was slightly less rolling resistance, lighter weight, but more prone to flats.
Slightly worse in the wet(but the S is excellent in the wet mind you)
Good for TT's

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:20 pm
by rruff
IMO the Conti SS is the TT tire. I recently got one of the Attack 22mm, and it has a thin tread like the SS, but apparently has the puncture belt. Not much difference if any between that and the RS.

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:46 pm
by ODT
Ah you mean the supersonic? I think it would be quite "odd" for a German company, to put "SS" in your product name, perhaps even prohibited

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:58 pm
by rruff
Yes it is the Super Sonic. The Attack I have weighs only 175g, and it is constructed like the GP4000RS, but is a little smaller in size.

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 12:50 pm
by Kraaf
SLight wrote:Tour has done another clincher vs. tubular test and the GP4000RS clincher wins (of course... test are done @ continental)
and again, no latex innertubes used


Bumping an old thread, for a small correction. Not getting into another Tour testing debate, just some facts:
- When talking rolling resistance and weight, Continental did not win, Veloflex did; the Record clincher is hailed as the lightest and best rolling tire ever tested. 2nd place in rolling resistance is the Continental GP Supersonic. The 4000 RS is in third. It did win the overall test (better puncture resistance and grip in the wet).
- The best rolling tubular tested was the Vittoria Crono EVO CS 22.
- Tour does test at the Continental facility, so it is logical that the Conti tires are optimized for that. Tour does however use there own measuring equipment.
- Tour acknowledges the effect of the inner tube. They tested with a 75g butyl tube (as opposed to a heavier tube in previous tests; results not directly backwards comparable) and state that with a latex tube, the rolling resistance of the clinchers, as tested, would drop by 2-3Watts.
- There is no measured difference in puncture resistance between the RS and the R (previous tests), as both tires pass the 180 second cut-off point in Tours' test (sharpened screwdriver pressed on the inflated tire with 35kg force, mechanical rocking motion applied)
- According Tour and Continental, the RS has a new compound, so it's not a R with a thinner tread, but it does have only half the tread depth. Tour tested the life of the RS at ~3000km for the rear tire.

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:28 am
by durianrider
Looks like 4000s one of the best tyres now..

http://www.conti-online.com/generator/w ... 00s_en.pdf

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:54 am
by 5 8 5
I like Tour tests but that one is 5 years old. Things have moved on.

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:52 pm
by Kraaf
Yes, they have.
For example, Tour no longer tests at Continental. They have their own setup, purpose designed and built. It can measure rolling resistance in corners, not just when the wheel is perpendicular to the road. Nifty.

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 7:28 pm
by WMW
Kraaf wrote:Bumping an old thread, for a small correction. Not getting into another Tour testing debate, just some facts


Are you referencing a new test?

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:31 pm
by allezkmiec
Umm, read a bit closer there... that bump was done over two years ago.

Re: Continental Grand Prix 4000 RS

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:31 pm
by Weenie

Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com