Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Thu Sep 21, 2017 11:41 am

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3323 posts ]  Go to page Previous 148 49 50 51 52222 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:18 pm
Posts: 621
djconnel wrote:
Another factor: acceleration-based cadence is challenging if you don't have a way to separate centrifugal acceleration from the bike bouncing up and down. I wonder how they make that work and how well it works, especially at lower cadences (for example, 40 rpm) on rough roads, especially since their accelerometers appear to be on an intermediate radius of the crank arm (where centrifugal acceleration is less than on the outer radius, for example at the pedal).


There is a pretty easy way to calculate this. If you place two accelerometers in the crankarm at a known distance (very little if possible) and you substract the two readings, you can calculate the radial component of acceleration. Neglecting the difference of acceleration between these two point due to the rotation of the bicycle as a whole and applying some sort of filtering you can get a pretty accurate value.

I'm impressed by the weight. Full strain gauges bridge with temperature compensation, accelerometer/s, Bluetooth chip and battery. There must be some sort of electronics WWism

_________________
http://cds-0.blogspot.com


Top
   
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:54 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5410
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
J-Nice wrote:
Put out a reliable power meter that measures power independently for each leg at a reasonable price point and it will be a niche product no longer.

Everyone who rides will get one. It's a disgrace that after 20 or so years we only have SRM and Powertap in an industry where change to whole bike lines occur every year.
Doping cover-ups are a disgrace. Slow progress in availability of low cost accurate power meters may be a disappointment, but I don't consider it a disgrace.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:16 pm
Posts: 75
Changing the topic slightly: Has anyone spoken with the reps at the Garmin booth regarding updates on the Vector release date? Are they even displaying them? I know this is wishful thinking but the Vectors, as advertised, are ideally suited to my needs.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:03 pm
Posts: 2014
Location: San Francisco Peninsula
Yeah, a teammate stopped by day before yesterday and just got the generic info. No timeline, still working on making the product perfect, etc.

_________________
2013 Wilier Cento1 SR || 2009 Ridley Crossbow || 2011 Yeti AS-R 5 Carbon


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: San Francisco, CA
Garmin had a poster only on Vector. Polar/Look had a non-working demo, but promised to "come back tomorrow" (I was there only yesterday). Rotor Power crank was very cool: best of the three crank arm based units (others were Pioneer and StagesOne). StagesOne was also quite impressive on a price-constraint basis. Likely not as accurate, though, even if they come out with a 2-leg version.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Last edited by djconnel on Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:26 pm
Posts: 182
mca56 wrote:
Changing the topic slightly: Has anyone spoken with the reps at the Garmin booth regarding updates on the Vector release date? Are they even displaying them? I know this is wishful thinking but the Vectors, as advertised, are ideally suited to my needs.


DC Rainmaker has an update but no firm release date.

http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2012/09/the- ... olden.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Quote:
Garmin’s stance is that they won’t go into production until they can press and ship thousands of units at once. And it was noted that they won’t do that until the quality bar is there. It’s been clear talking to numerous Garmin folks at both Eurobike and Interbike that the technical and timeline stumbles with the FR910XT are still painfully fresh in everyone’s mind. There’s no desire to reenact that again.

That all said, timeline wise the public stance is Q4 CY2012 (end of year). I think we might see some more concrete info and display at CES (first week of January) around their distribution and release plans. But I wouldn’t expect to see a Vector under a Christmas tree this calendar year.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:08 pm
Posts: 195
On the Vector, I was told "a few months into 2013."

Also, "it's a $1500 unit. That means we don't want a single return."

_________________
VeloNews Magazine/VeloNews.com tech


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: San Francisco, CA
VNTech wrote:
On the Vector, I was told "a few months into 2013."

Also, "it's a $1500 unit. That means we don't want a single return."


The Rainmaker article describes how Garmin is setting the quality/reliability bar high (in contrast, perhaps, to Polar/Look).

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:04 pm
Posts: 233
It sounded to me that Garmin wants to be able to have a lot of units ready for sale when they come to the market, while Polar/Look are simply selling the few units that they can actually successfully produce, i.e., to me it looks like Polar/Look also has yield problems, but still sell the items that make it through quality control.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: San Francisco, CA
I was a bit surprised, however, that there I was for my one day @ Interbike, ready to be impressed with how ultra-cool the Look/Polar system was, and they didn't even have it set up.

Come to think of it, I didn't see any working power meter demos, perhaps excepting the Quarq static torque arm-strength contest (winner was around 153, I think, while I got only to 27 :)).

Pioneer's torque-versus-angle diagram (with computed efficiency metric) was very cool. Their dedicated head unit allows more flexibility than relying on Garmin. It would be interesting to test how well it actually works, however.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:13 pm
Posts: 235
Image

Maybe old news but the design of the Dura Ace 9000 SRM powermeter is official. I guess it comes as no surprise that they are still using the 7800 arm.... Looks a little off due to shimano's new bolt pattern.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 12:35 am
Posts: 1474
Anything radical happening at the Brim Brothers booth? I heard their slogan was...

"Brim Brothers. Taking pre-orders on vaporware since 2006!!!"

_________________
Check out the latest controversies in sport-

http://berzin.blogspot.com/


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:20 am
Posts: 1464
They were at the Ant+ symposium

_________________
"Step forward the climber and all those who worship at the altar of lightness" - R. Millar


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:42 pm
Posts: 42
J-Nice wrote:
It's a disgrace that after 20 or so years we only have SRM and Powertap in an industry where change to whole bike lines occur every year.

There's a reason for that. It's not as easy as you think to make a cheap, accurate, universal power meter


Top
   
 Post subject: New powermeter rumours
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 1147
Gee, you have a monopoly by two major players and innovation stagnates while prices remain high? Who knew?


Top
   
 Post subject: New powermeter rumours
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:04 pm 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3323 posts ]  Go to page Previous 148 49 50 51 52222 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Can't Pairing PC7 with SRM Powermeter

in Road

Molek

3

438

Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:32 am

mrgray View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Shimano R9100-P Powermeter

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

jay cee

39

5829

Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:40 pm

benjaminm3 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Garmin Powermeter question

in Road

PrettyA

7

414

Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:53 am

3Pio View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. quarq powermeter connection to mac failing

in Road

weptunus

3

545

Fri Aug 18, 2017 4:17 am

jlok View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Powermeter Help - P2M Force vs Dzero Red vs InPower

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

MikeyBE

15

1538

Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:49 am

anlimdy22 View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 573, Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], crn, exilerunner, Google [Bot], Philbar72, rsantos450, shotgun and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited