HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Frame for big guys
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 1:32 pm
Posts: 253
Location: AUSTRALIA
I am currently on a Colnago C40 which is great but am starting on a new race bike. I need a lightweight frame as a base. Aluminium is out so that leaves Carbon or Ti. I am leaning toward the Ghisallo, which is light with no rider weight limit. I am 200lbs and put a lot of torque through the BB / rear triangle. I know the Ghisallo has a reputation for being a bit flexy - is the '05 model any stiffer? Any bigger guys out there with experience and / or any other frame / fork combo suggestions ? Thanx.

_________________
GO HARD OR GO HOME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame for big guys
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 12:01 am
Posts: 389
Location: California
smallfish101 wrote:
I am currently on a Colnago C40 which is great but am starting on a new race bike. I need a lightweight frame as a base. Aluminium is out so that leaves Carbon or Ti. I am leaning toward the Ghisallo, which is light with no rider weight limit. I am 200lbs and put a lot of torque through the BB / rear triangle. I know the Ghisallo has a reputation for being a bit flexy - is the '05 model any stiffer? Any bigger guys out there with experience and / or any other frame / fork combo suggestions ? Thanx.


Given your weight I'd look at carbon. The Ghisallo while light will be a noodle at your weight. I have ridden one and I'm 50lbs lighter than you and I thought it was to flexable. Just my .02 :lol:

_________________
Cheers,
:lol:

"Ride lots." -- Eddy Merckx

Click Here to see my Scott CR1.


Last edited by zoey on Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame for big guys
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:10 am 


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 1:32 pm
Posts: 253
Location: AUSTRALIA
Thanks Zoey. :) I respect these opinions a lot. It gets away from all the manufacturers BS and into the real nitty gritty.
Keep 'em rolling

_________________
GO HARD OR GO HOME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 2:57 am
Posts: 206
For what its worth, I really like the feel of a Trek. My dad has a 5900 and I ride it pretty frequently over my (former) Giant TCR carbon. It felt wayy stiffer in the BB area, and he even had aluminum Record cranks and I have FSA carbon. I weigh 140 so I'm not that good of an indicator, but he's 180-185 and loves it. I know its a "Trek" but hey, they do make good bikes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 4:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 509
I'm 220 lbs and I ride a Storck Carbon 1.1 with a regular Stiletto fork, nice and stiff, better than my old Trek 5200. Storck now has a 1.0 frame which is even stiffer. A good way to go for big guys.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Carbon
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 4:49 am
Posts: 1902
Talk to nicrump here at WW. He builds custom carbon (and steel) frames.

_________________
Success is how far you you bounce back up after being knocked down


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 7:35 pm
Posts: 1438
Location: Middle of nowhere, EU
1.96 meters and 92 kg´s on an XXL Scott Cr1. Nice and stiff, love it :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:02 pm
Posts: 1940
Location: Getting dropped
Every Ghisallo we sold broke and had to be warrentied. The walls of the tubing are just too thin and a person over 150lbs will flex and brake one.

I would look at a OCLV 110 Trek or a Scott CR1. I know of a 6'3 gentleman that loves his 120OCLV 5200 Trek and now that there is a lot of 110 models for 05 I think you'd love it. It's an inexpensive bike as well so you can race on it, thrash it, and if you crash it oh well. You don't want to crash your C40.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 9:10 pm
Posts: 378
Location: Colorado
One thing I will give Trek is that they have a really good warrenty program. I cracked an OCLV mountain bike and they replaced it no questions asked.

The really cool part was the the frame was no longer in production and not offered the year I broke it. They still replaced it for free.

Additionally, I had bought the bike from someone else (it was new in the box, but I was not the orginal owner). That's what I call a warrenty program!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 12:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 4:05 pm
Posts: 1288
Orbea Orca...

Only had it a couple of weeks but at 190 pounds so good so far

Very light as well....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 9:10 pm
Posts: 378
Location: Colorado
Speaking of Orbea, I was down at my LBS yesterday and they had the new Orbea Onix. It's a beafier version of the Orca. Frame weight is just over 1200 grams.

The owner of the store said it was very popular with bigger guys because it's stiffer than the Orca. It's also alot cheaper than a the Orca.

Just a thought.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame for big guys
PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 6:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 6:05 am
Posts: 1011
smallfish101 wrote:
I am currently on a Colnago C40 which is great but am starting on a new race bike. I need a lightweight frame as a base. Aluminium is out so that leaves Carbon or Ti. I am leaning toward the Ghisallo, which is light with no rider weight limit. I am 200lbs and put a lot of torque through the BB / rear triangle. I know the Ghisallo has a reputation for being a bit flexy - is the '05 model any stiffer? Any bigger guys out there with experience and / or any other frame / fork combo suggestions ? Thanx.


Good suggestions above .. but am wondering why you say aluminum is out? It's pretty cost effective, light, stiff and strong enough even for your weight. It might break sooner then steel or Ti but you could possibly afford to break anywhere from four to eight Aluminum frames at the cost of a carbon or Ti one. And if you're racing, that's worth considering, unless you have a team paying for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 06, 2004 1:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:32 pm
Posts: 1266
Location: the Netherlands
Aluminium can be just as good (especially the larger frames) as carbon is. for example the 2003 Scott alu xxl team issue is just as good as the 2004 carbon version (same goes for the Storck but here I think the alu versions are slightly better)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame for big guys
PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 1:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 1:32 pm
Posts: 253
Location: AUSTRALIA
bobalou wrote:
Good suggestions above .. but am wondering why you say aluminum is out? It's pretty cost effective, light, stiff and strong enough even for your weight. It might break sooner then steel or Ti but you could possibly afford to break anywhere from four to eight Aluminum frames at the cost of a carbon or Ti one. And if you're racing, that's worth considering, unless you have a team paying for it.

The reason that I do not want aluminium is that it is a much harsher ride than either carbon or Ti. Our roads are not great. I have had several Aluminium bikes in the past and the carbon is streets ahead.

_________________
GO HARD OR GO HOME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 6:05 pm
Posts: 571
Quote:
The reason that I do not want aluminium is that it is a much harsher ride than either carbon or Ti


Ti is a much better ride than Alu. or Carbon, but you do sacrafice stiffness.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:54 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: abstrait, Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], physeter, stestu101, Yahoo [Bot] and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Why is there that difference on my frame

in Road

isa

2

553

Wed May 07, 2014 4:45 pm

isa View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Look frame choice - 586 vs 595 vs 695

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

thencameyou

17

1654

Wed Jan 22, 2014 2:48 pm

denvertrout View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Refurbishing and ALU/carbon frame

in Road

themyers

2

411

Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:17 am

themyers View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. FSA Gossamer BB386 EVO on BB Right frame

in Road

uraz

6

691

Thu Jul 24, 2014 1:40 am

prebsy View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Help me identify generic TT frame

in Road

ultyguy

5

795

Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:26 am

ultyguy View the latest post


It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:08 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB