Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Tue Sep 27, 2016 8:19 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 3:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 5:58 pm
Posts: 32
In that photo, his bike computer doesn't appear to be the usual HAC4.
Any clue what hes using?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 3:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 6:05 am
Posts: 1011
Mav54 wrote:
In that photo, his bike computer doesn't appear to be the usual HAC4.
Any clue what hes using?


It looks like a vetta v100 wireless from the fork mount.


Top
   
 Post subject:
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 3:50 am 


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 3:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 1:52 am
Posts: 1623
Mav54 wrote:
In that photo, his bike computer doesn't appear to be the usual HAC4.
Any clue what hes using?

From Christian Vande Velde:
"Counting grams
Prior to the start Roberto had to change his rear wheel as his bike was 100 grams under the legal weight. The climbers on the team have bikes with small wheels as well. Lance had a weight problem before the start as well and the Postal mechanics had to throw a couple of computers, or something, on his bike to bring it to 6.8 kg. I was pleasantly surprised that my stock race bike came in at 6.9."
http://www.velonews.com/tour2004/diaries/articles/6636.0.html

_________________
"Gimondi è un eroe umano, che viene sconfitto ma che continua la sua corsa fino a tornare a vincere." - Enrico Ruggeri


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 3:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 6:05 am
Posts: 1011
cadence90 wrote:

I was pleasantly surprised that my stock race bike came in at 6.9.


What does he ride, I wonder?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 4:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 6:05 am
Posts: 1011
Wait... maybe I shouldn't have asked that. I think they're rebadged Giants (BH)! :lol: :lol:


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 4:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 1:52 am
Posts: 1623
Well, he's on Liberty right?
So...a Giant/BH??? Please, let's not reopen that rebadge thing again! :wink:
Image

_________________
"Gimondi è un eroe umano, che viene sconfitto ma che continua la sua corsa fino a tornare a vincere." - Enrico Ruggeri


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 12:45 pm
Posts: 1165
Location: In the Woods
BigFloppyLlama wrote:
Mile Ditch wrote:
It's been said before, but why doesn't Lance use a lighter seatpin or something, and then use a front STI. Maybe it's just for show or a psychological advantage. Those Trek frames can't be all that light if this is the case.


Why the brake at all? I doubt he was doing much braking today:D Isn't Lance known to go with what he knows and trusts, thus he uses the downtube shifter just because he's used to it?


the UCI demands the bikes to be fitted with 2 working brakes

_________________
Auribus teneo lupum


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 8:39 pm
Posts: 1234
Location: Holland
ShinyBaldy wrote:
asphaltdude wrote:
divve wrote:
...because weight isn't all that important. In real life conditions no one is going to loose time over a few hundred grams.


Rough calculation: every 100 grams cost 3 seconds.......


don't you think that calculation is rather simplistic?

not all savings in weight are equal

rotational weight saves more than static weight by quite a large margin - I'll rather have a bike that weights 8 kilos with sub 1kilo wheels than a bike at 6.8 with wheels over 1kilo.


When riding with constant speed weight distribution doesn't matter.

_________________
Whow! That's a pretty damn nice garage door!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 12:45 pm
Posts: 1165
Location: In the Woods
Do you have cruise control on your bike?
Have you ever checked the speed readouts on a Polar graph?
Even on the flattest of surfaces your speed is varying all the time, thus although you are correct in theory , in practice the influence of the rotating mass (wheels) is indeed playing all the time .
Another theory vs practice thingie.

_________________
Auribus teneo lupum


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 3:11 pm
Posts: 554
Location: Detroit-USA
So did Lance ride the Madonne SSL or the SL on the time trial?

Once again Frankie showed his bike beofe the climb and said that he was using the SL but the SSL was made especially for this climb-

Does anybody know for sure??????


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 4:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 4:04 pm
Posts: 18
C-40 wrote:
So did Lance ride the Madonne SSL or the SL on the time trial?

Once again Frankie showed his bike beofe the climb and said that he was using the SL but the SSL was made especially for this climb-

Does anybody know for sure??????


I believe Lance rode the SL, SL is right on the limit already and there were some questions regarding to the rigidity of SSL. But of course, it's too difficult to tell from pictures since both bikes pretty much looked the same.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 12:45 pm
Posts: 1165
Location: In the Woods
On Sporza they interviewed the mechanic where Lance gets his tubes and he said Lance used a frame especially made for this occasion with less fibers per square meter in the carbon .
He also said that Trek was thinking of commercialising this frame a rato of 6000€
There would also be a warning attached to it regarding the max weight of the rider.
About those tubes. They stay in a darkened room for 6-7 years to make them softer and less resistant thus better rolling. He only has 6 left . I'm not sure about the make of the tubes but it wasn't Vittoria , perhaps Clement.

Ulrich used a special frontwheel only to be used for uphill.

_________________
Auribus teneo lupum


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 5:31 pm
Posts: 125
Adri wrote:
About those tubes. They stay in a darkened room for 6-7 years to make them softer and less resistant thus better rolling. He only has 6 left . I'm not sure about the make of the tubes but it wasn't Vittoria , perhaps Clement.



Jeez, it's like a fine wine or cheese. :?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 8:39 pm
Posts: 1234
Location: Holland
Wasn't Lance riding Dugast tubulars?

_________________
Whow! That's a pretty damn nice garage door!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 7:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:44 am
Posts: 640
Location: Boulder, CO
aging tubulars is old-school man, all the big guns used to do that. I could see doing that to a set of Dugasts, heck yeah!

I've thought about aging clinchers, as I found some tires picked up flats earlier when they were new, then got tougher as they aged...or at least it appeared that way to me.


Top
   
 Post subject:
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 7:53 pm 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. MG Tech planetary gear crankset with 1.44 x multiplication. Bollocks or real benefit?

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

Sacke

33

1362

Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:49 am

mattr View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Multebear, tonytourist and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited