Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:35 am

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 6:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 4:04 pm
Posts: 18
Maybe even with the bars Jan's bike still weights 6.8 kg. As I understand that now bikes can get so light some T-Mobile riders ride with SRM cranks.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 7:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 4:15 am
Posts: 3308
Location: tucson
the water point is moot as well, if you watched closely you would have noticed riders like basso jetisoning water throughout the stage (just squeezing it onto the road) why do you think that they wouldd do that if they didn't feel like the weight advantage was worth it?


Top
   
 Post subject:
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 7:03 pm 


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 8:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 2:23 am
Posts: 35
Location: UK
Bruiser wrote:
looked a bit like an aero advantage.
I know that camelbacks are illegal due to their aero advantage :?


Aero advantage at 15mph?! :?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 360
Location: Colorado
Quote:
Maybe even with the bars Jan's bike still weights 6.8 kg


They said Jan's bike weight was 7.2kg - strange he had a heavier one.

Notice Lance only had one ring on the front (at least no shifter cable on the left)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:14 pm 
Offline
AKA "The Nils"!
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 11:01 pm
Posts: 1069
Location: Germany
Lance used a double setup in the front.
But he (once again) hasn't been using the left STI unit, but a thumb shifter on the downtube.
Notice the front derailleur cable in the pic and Lance being on the small chainring.
Image

[/img]

_________________
| http://www.ax-lightness.de |
| pk0r.com | "I respect the work in coloring parts but the result is stupid-monkey in silk clothes is still monkey." |


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 10:24 pm
Posts: 329
Location: UK
It's been said before, but why doesn't Lance use a lighter seatpin or something, and then use a front STI. Maybe it's just for show or a psychological advantage. Those Trek frames can't be all that light if this is the case.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 360
Location: Colorado
thanks for the correction. I just noticed no sti on the left. Unusual set up


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 10:02 am
Posts: 98
Mile Ditch wrote:
It's been said before, but why doesn't Lance use a lighter seatpin or something, and then use a front STI. Maybe it's just for show or a psychological advantage. Those Trek frames can't be all that light if this is the case.


Why the brake at all? I doubt he was doing much braking today:D Isn't Lance known to go with what he knows and trusts, thus he uses the downtube shifter just because he's used to it?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 10:24 pm
Posts: 329
Location: UK
nzkiwiguy wrote:
thanks for the correction. I just noticed no sti on the left. Unusual set up


I think Alex Zulle started this, quite a few people have done this on their climbing bikes over the years. Ullrich used to do it too.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 11:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 8:31 pm
Posts: 478
asphaltdude wrote:
divve wrote:
...because weight isn't all that important. In real life conditions no one is going to loose time over a few hundred grams.


Rough calculation: every 100 grams cost 3 seconds.......


don't you think that calculation is rather simplistic?

not all savings in weight are equal

rotational weight saves more than static weight by quite a large margin - I'll rather have a bike that weights 8 kilos with sub 1kilo wheels than a bike at 6.8 with wheels over 1kilo.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 11:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 10:24 pm
Posts: 329
Location: UK
BigFloppyLlama wrote:
Why the brake at all? I doubt he was doing much braking today:D Isn't Lance known to go with what he knows and trusts, thus he uses the downtube shifter just because he's used to it?


Unfortunately they have to have 2 brakes. Tom Danielson used only 1 on his hillclimb bike for some American race, not under UCI rules.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 11:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 10:02 am
Posts: 98
Mile Ditch wrote:
BigFloppyLlama wrote:
Why the brake at all? I doubt he was doing much braking today:D Isn't Lance known to go with what he knows and trusts, thus he uses the downtube shifter just because he's used to it?


Unfortunately they have to have 2 brakes. Tom Danielson used only 1 on his hillclimb bike for some American race, not under UCI rules.


Just tape the cable to the handlebar and yank on it when you need to:D Forgot about that rule though.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 11:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 9:10 pm
Posts: 378
Location: Colorado
to futher add to Mile's post - they have to have 2 working brakes.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 11:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 10:02 am
Posts: 98
And to add to the downtube shifter thing, if the SLBS-78 downtube shifter he uses is set to friction, it could give him greater control over the front derailuer. Much more so than the trimming the STI levers use.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 3:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 8:05 pm
Posts: 2069
Great photo of L'Alpe d'Huez from a satellite.

_________________
PLAY DARTS! *WARNING* MUST HAVE A SENSE OF HUMOR TO PLAY!!!


Top
   
 Post subject:
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 3:14 am 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2013 Northwave extreme tech SBS vs current extreme tech shoes

in Road

Delorre

3

490

Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:37 am

mrlobber View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Parlee Altum owners- Let's Talk tire sizes

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

boots2000

23

2081

Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:58 pm

RichTheRoadie View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Future tech, can road bikes get any faster?

in Road

eyedrop

14

1763

Thu Apr 06, 2017 7:44 pm

TurboKoo View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Applesoap, CarlosFerreiro, Littlemad, wheelsONfire, Yahoo [Bot] and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited