HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2004 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:36 pm
Posts: 4123
Is the flex of the axle spindle linear? I'm not a physics major but my understanding is that flex is non-linear and will become increasingly more difficult before the point of failure is reached.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2004 4:57 pm 


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2004 6:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 5:31 pm
Posts: 125
The flex is linear over a certain range of load from zero to some percentage of it's ultimate breaking strength, after that it becomes non-linear and no longer springs back to it's original position, it yields. After it yields it also becomes much less stiff.

Any mechanical component intended to last for repeated cycles of loading and unloading, especially when the consequence of failure is injury or even death, is going to be designed within the elastic range of the material with a pretty good margin of safety. Once you yield the material you are well on your way to initiating a crack and then that crack grows and then you do a face plant in the middle of a sprint.

Also realize that putting out 2400 Watts at 60 RPM is putting down 282 foot-lbs at the crank which, given a 175 crank arm is like leg pressing almost 500 lbs with one leg. I know, I know they pull up on one crank and push down on the other but you get the idea.

The point is that even the "lowly" campy square taper, cro-moly bottom bracket axle is more than good enough for 99.9% of the riders out there.

The marketing department at Shimano would like you to believe otherwise though so that you'll buy a new drivetrain.

Properly designed most bikes should last a lifetime, which isn't very good for business. So they have to come up with "NEW AND IMPROVED BOTTOM BRACKET, WITH SCRUBBING BUBBLES" so you'll buy more stuff. How much you want to bet we see 11 speed drivetrains and 135mm road bike rear spacing with ten years. "Well waddya know, all your stuff is obsolete. WE just happen to have the latest and greatest, not like brand X which uses that OLD technology." [/END RANT]

Also, generally speaking for a given bottom bracket shell diameter it's going to be a tradeoff between axle size and bearing life. The larger the axle the smaller the balls have to be and the shorter the life span. I suppose with double row bearing and ceramics that is less of an issue though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:36 pm
Posts: 4123
Good info and thanks for the explanation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 8:45 pm
Posts: 558
Location: Anchorage, AK
It's like biopace and powercam! you get it all back at the bottom of the pedal stroke! :lol:

for a rather humorous explanation with some good analogies that make it all easy to understand (and explain to your friends) check out: http://bontrager.com/keith/rants.asp?id=32


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 5:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 5:31 pm
Posts: 125
A little more grist for the mill. If you crunch the numbers as I have above, you'll find that the ISIS design is about 3 times more torsionally stiff than the old square taper design.

Now, I've read on this board that Cipo rides an aluminum ISIS BB.

If that's the case, since the modulus of Aluminum is about three times less than that of steel, any stiffness gains by design are negated by material choice. All you've done is made a lightweight BB that's about as stiff in torsion as a traditional campy square taper cro-mo axle.

So Super mario doesn't care about the torsional stiffness of his BB axle, he's a weight weenie.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: agfu, Bing [Bot], eric, Google Adsense [Bot], jekyll man, JHinMD, MNX1024, TedStriker, wrcompositi and 76 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Mystery Pinarello

in Road

Lucas1234

12

1926

Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:17 pm

bigben99 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. The all new Pinarello Dogma F8...

[ Go to page: 1 ... 5, 6, 7 ]

in Road

ichobi

96

9830

Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:25 pm

ultimobici View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Pinarello Dogma 65.1 think 2 (or Dogma2) vs. Cervelo R5

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Road

RoyalV

39

6710

Fri Oct 25, 2013 4:15 pm

ianSWBB View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Pinarello Dogma2 vs Canyon Aeroad cf 9.0

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Road

Pepsi

31

3786

Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:41 am

dominikk View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Pinarello Paris sizing recommendations

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

tazik

17

1208

Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:12 pm

tazik View the latest post


It is currently Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:53 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB