Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:09 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 5:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 7:35 pm
Posts: 1484
Location: Middle of nowhere, EU
sharkman wrote:
The paint indeed chips off easy but reapairing is so easy. Teammate got some deep scratches on his frame. I sandpapered it and spraYed a new layer of clear coate on the chainstay and it from new.


Hey me being a dummy on recoating what kind of clearcoat spray was that?


Top
   
 Post subject:
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 5:57 pm 


Top
   
 
 Post subject: Scott purchase (Help)
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 1:06 pm
Posts: 38
Want to purchase a Scott CR1 frameset. Who has the best deal? I live in florida. Is purchasing overseas and getting shipped to US cheaper?
Help!!!

_________________
Maui Mike


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 7:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 12:34 pm
Posts: 1670
Location: New York City
just saw the scott cr1 team issue frame for the first time. my lbs has it in display in med. i must say i am impressed with the frame. only thing i am debating is which size to get.

any thoughts on size and fit? right now i am using a giant med. 55.5 top tube w/130 stem, the cr1 large is a 56 i would use a 120 stem or an XL which is 57.5, and a 105 syntace stem. any opinions?

what is the head tubes height, on the scott cr1 l and xl frames?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 9:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 8:39 pm
Posts: 1234
Location: Holland
I think you'd better take size L

_________________
Whow! That's a pretty damn nice garage door!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:36 pm
Posts: 4123
I also suggest you find out what the seat tube angle of the Scott is as well. If it's steeper than your Giant it will effectively increase the top tube length. As a result your saddle will have to be set farther back. Conversely a slacker seat tube compared to your current set-up will require a more forward saddle position in order to maintain the same pedal to knee/leg relation and shorten the effective top tube length.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 12:34 pm
Posts: 1670
Location: New York City
asphaltdude wrote:
I think you'd better take size L
why the large over the XL

the seat angles are 73.5 (large) 73.3 (XL) on the scott. and 73.5 in my giant frame.

i am still unsure. the Xl scott frame has a 57.5 cm top tube, it would be the same length with a 105mm stem as a 56 cm top tube frame with a 120mm stem. i could use a shorter seatpost, but i still dont know the height of the head tube, i would like to know this; because it might make my bars too high in a Xlarge frame size.

now are their advantages from using a smaller frame and longer stem?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 1:59 am
Posts: 1386
Location: Sydney, Australia
There would be weight advantages, but I'd guess the handling woul be more important than a few grams. Pends what you want in a frame.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 1:52 am
Posts: 1623
Pez Cycling review:
http://procyclingnews.com/default.asp?pg=fullstory&id=2460

_________________
"Gimondi è un eroe umano, che viene sconfitto ma che continua la sua corsa fino a tornare a vincere." - Enrico Ruggeri


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 5:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 10:30 pm
Posts: 225
cadence90 wrote:


Wa ?

Honestly i like guys over at pez but the reviews are just.... turd.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 5:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 1:52 am
Posts: 1623
Tim the Pineapple wrote:
cadence90 wrote:


Wa ?

Honestly i like guys over at pez but the reviews are just.... turd.

Wawa. :)
Yes, their "reviews" are badly written and all they do is gush, but it has different photos than the standard full side view, that's all. And so many folks on this forum seem in love with the bike....

_________________
"Gimondi è un eroe umano, che viene sconfitto ma che continua la sua corsa fino a tornare a vincere." - Enrico Ruggeri


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 10:30 pm
Posts: 225
cadence90 wrote:
Tim the Pineapple wrote:
cadence90 wrote:


Wa ?

Honestly i like guys over at pez but the reviews are just.... turd.

Wawa. :)
Yes, their "reviews" are badly written and all they do is gush, but it has different photos than the standard full side view, that's all. And so many folks on this forum seem in love with the bike....


Just had a chicken sandwhich and coffee from Wawa :)

Im wondering if there are any other (no crappy) reviews for the cr1; everyone here seem to like it but i don't buy it.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 8:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 6:05 am
Posts: 1011
cadence90 wrote:


The procycling report quotes the Scott stock fork weight at 290.

If you look earlier in this thread, velocity posted a pick of the fork weighing in at 446g!! That's a significant difference!

I've rarely seen anything negative about a scott but this weight difference would tick me off if I'd bought the frame. I wonder if the 290g is what Scott quotes or if procycling just plain got it wrong?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:01 pm
Posts: 2487
Quote:
I've rarely seen anything negative about a scott but this weight difference would tick me off if I'd bought the frame. I wonder if the 290g is what Scott quotes or if procycling just plain got it wrong?


You forget, Scott offers two different forks with the frameset. The standard is the aero fork, that's what weighs 440g. The Other fork is the Superlite model, made for 150lbs or under, and it weighs 290g.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:36 pm
Posts: 4123
They show and describe the aero fork and state it's 290g.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 9:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:01 pm
Posts: 2487
Quote:
They show and describe the aero fork and state it's 290g.


Obviously they messed up.


Top
   
 Post subject:
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 9:55 pm 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. SCOTT CR1 SL 2011 with Di2 ?

in Road

idinfo68

1

266

Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:38 pm

merkyworks View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Scott bikes 2017

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

tarmackev

19

3143

Thu Sep 15, 2016 4:16 am

FatCake View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2017 Scott availability

in Road

russianbear

0

242

Sun Sep 11, 2016 11:31 pm

russianbear View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Scott Addict size

in Road

cyclist

10

528

Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:57 am

gerardk1111 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) '09 Scott R2 & S-Works cranks?... No... Maybe ;)

in Road

L33boy

1

211

Mon Jul 18, 2016 2:26 am

andrewfelix View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beanbiken, Bing [Bot], elzilcho, Google Adsense [Bot], McGilli, MSNbot Media, nickf, PJCM and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited