Armstrongs new bike! Holy S@#!

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
Post Reply
User avatar
Superlite
Posts: 2492
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:01 pm

by Superlite

http://www.cyclingnews.com/teamtech04.p ... _armstrong

Armstrong isn't taking any chances, check this thing out!

DAMN!! Those wheels are pretty sweet, and the frame wow! Trek and Bontrager really have taken things up a notch, a BIG notch!

by Weenie


User avatar
cyclemanpat
Posts: 1716
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Location: Kentucky, USA

by cyclemanpat

looks like all the other boring Trek bikes

User avatar
cyclemanpat
Posts: 1716
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Location: Kentucky, USA

by cyclemanpat

but the wheels are very cool.....what is the weight of the wheels?

User avatar
Superlite
Posts: 2492
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:01 pm

by Superlite

cyclemanpat wrote:
looks like all the other boring Trek bikes


:roll:

Obviously you never heard " Don't judge a book by it's cover."

BigFloppyLlama
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 10:02 am

by BigFloppyLlama

Superlite wrote:
cyclemanpat wrote:
looks like all the other boring Trek bikes


:roll:

Obviously you never heard " Don't judge a book by it's cover."


What's your point? He never commented about anything other than the looks of the bike. When judging solely on aesthetics the “cover” is the only thing that matters. I’m impressed by the technical details of the bike, but other than that it looks like every other Trek out there for the umpteenth year in a row.

User avatar
Cyco
Posts: 1903
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 4:49 am

by Cyco

The front hub looks at lot like the B-T-P one Florian posted the article on.
Success is how far you you bounce back up after being knocked down

User avatar
martin
Posts: 950
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 9:49 am
Location: München
Contact:

by martin

Superlite wrote:http://www.cyclingnews.com/teamtech04.php?id=tech/2004/probikes/madone_ssl_armstrong

Armstrong isn't taking any chances, check this thing out!

DAMN!! Those wheels are pretty sweet, and the frame wow! Trek and Bontrager really have taken things up a notch, a BIG notch!

That is one sloooow bike :-)
somehow that reminds me of the famous piece "The Gringo" in Santi Boteros Tour diary 2000:

"His smile said to me, ‘I was training while you were sleeping, Santiago.’ It also said, ‘I won this tour four months ago, while you were deciding what bike frame to use in the Tour. I trained harder than you did, Santiago. I don’t know if I am better than you are, but I have outworked you and right now, you cannot do anything about it. Enjoy your ride Santiago. See you in Paris.’"

http://www.chuckiev.coach-site.com/arti ... 7/7145.htm
Snowman and Strong Walker
Scott Sc
my old stuff
my new stuff

User avatar
Bruiser
Posts: 1386
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 1:59 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

by Bruiser

Don't you think they could find a new colour pattern or scheme?

Brian

Scapin/Dean
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 6:08 pm
Location: South NJ Shore

by Scapin/Dean

The one thing that this picture really shows well is how HUGE and ungainly looking the new DA 10-speed shifters are. Just as butt-ugly as their crankset.
Just because you are not paranoid doesn't mean we aren't out to get you.
Those who ignore histroy are doomed to repeat it.

User avatar
Dr.Dos
Posts: 904
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 11:00 pm

by Dr.Dos

Treks only achievment is make already long chainstays look even longer. The bike is butt-ugly with the top tupe (optically) sloping downward to the front. Also Lance' setup with the high bars and brakelevers is a slap in the face.

User avatar
tobias
Posts: 154
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 11:21 pm
Location: haan* <GER>
Contact:

by tobias

...i totally agree (i never likes the trekies...).
the interesting part about that bike are the hubs...

who finds any any simularities;) ??

Image

Image
nothing.

User avatar
Dr.Dos
Posts: 904
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 11:00 pm

by Dr.Dos

That's how edco builds their hubs for quite a time.

Joel
Posts: 751
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 1:43 pm
Location: Belgium

by Joel

The bontrangers are more conical shaped and don't have the bump in the middle

User avatar
divve
Posts: 4123
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:36 pm
Contact:

by divve

Just window shopping cause at the end of the day it still has to weigh 6.8kg or more. Any decent production bike can reach that with a set of light wheels. No need for anything else really exotic and you've saved weight in the smartest place.

Regarding the brand Trek, I don't find them very interesting but some available paint jobs make them look pretty okay. The only thing I really can't stand is anything with the name Bontrager on it....just doesn't sound right as a brand name.

by Weenie


SnakeHead
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 12:21 pm

by SnakeHead

Hands up who has actually riden a madone?????
Well when you do you can stop thinking about those candy apple paint jobs you only get from some euro manufacture like colnago etc, they have paint jobs like that to distract you from the lack of workmanship!!
have a ride on one and look at the technology, this i a production platform bike with of the shelf groupo, bars, stem, seat etc. You dont see one of these one peice seat and posts (very light mind you) which you would never be able to get comfortable on, but your allready on the weight limit for UCI use.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post