Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Sat May 28, 2016 9:30 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED

If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Titanium V's Carbon
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 1:59 am
Posts: 1386
Location: Sydney, Australia
While Cadence asks about Ti frames I am interested in comparing the stiffness and quality of the two materials.

I know lots of people dream of Ti, but how does it compare in ride to Carbon?

Stiffness,
Vibration dampening,
Durability,
Cost.

Thanks in advance

Brian


Top
   
 Post subject: Dosn't matter
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 4:49 am
Posts: 1903
The tube's shape, butting profile, length, ply count, ply oriientation, material quaility, joining technique and joint design play a far greater role in bicycles than material.

This wont stop other from answering though :lol:

_________________
Success is how far you you bounce back up after being knocked down


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 360
Location: Colorado
I'm with Cyco on build design is most important

Up until now Ti was the top of the line as it allowed the best "custom" builds where you could choose the qualities of the bike and a good builder made it happen. You got durability and a frame which will last forever (and is repairable!)

Now you can get custom Carbon! I assume they will be able to offer the same customization. As to durability and repairability - don't think it's proven yet. Some lugged carbon frame allow for replacement of tubes, stays etc.

I have two Ti bikes and love them. Was getting a carbon but had issues getting it so had to compromise for now and got an alloy. A light carbon for climbing is next for me. (Kuota Kredo or Khan or a Orbea Orca probably)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 1:52 am
Posts: 1617
nzkiwiguy wrote:
I'm with Cyco on build design is most important

Up until now Ti was the top of the line as it allowed the best "custom" builds where you could choose the qualities of the bike and a good builder made it happen. You got durability and a frame which will last forever (and is repairable!)

Now you can get custom Carbon! I assume they will be able to offer the same customization. As to durability and repairability - don't think it's proven yet. Some lugged carbon frame allow for replacement of tubes, stays etc.

I have two Ti bikes and love them. Was getting a carbon but had issues getting it so had to compromise for now and got an alloy. A light carbon for climbing is next for me. (Kuota Kredo or Khan or a Orbea Orca probably)

I'll agree with that. I thought a lot about carbon, and this forum is a jewel for info esp. on carbon frames. The Giants, Kuota, Scotts I see are so seductive....
But I think Cyco and nz are right: design and build quality is critical.
Also, at least for me, carbon might be an option if I were looking for a specific-event bike, but for general everyday use I don't see the investment value, at least on my budget. I think with the good Ti builders, you have assurance on material quality, tubing selection, welds, warranty, durability, and most important some good experience, not just the builder but with the material itself. With carbon, there are "changes" every week it seems on lay-up theory, directionality, etc. For a team bike, great, but for me, everyday, I don't know....
In terms of Bruiser's specific questions, from what I've learned so far:
1) ti can be as stiff as carbon.
2) the vibration damping might be a bit better on an all-carbon frame (but I'm not sure on lugged designs, the lug design and bond will be critical there.
3) durability = ti
4) cost: I'm not sure yet, a good ti frame can run from +/- $1300 - $2000- $3300, so a very wide range....

_________________
"Gimondi รจ un eroe umano, che viene sconfitto ma che continua la sua corsa fino a tornare a vincere." - Enrico Ruggeri


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Carbon or Titanium rear triangle

in Road

slick1

14

882

Thu Aug 20, 2015 5:25 pm

hornedfrog View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Schmolke Carbon + Titanium bolts upgrade

in Road

njyeti

5

590

Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:27 am

njyeti View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Titanium, can it be improved?

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 5 ]

in Road

Poulidor

63

5621

Tue Dec 29, 2015 3:50 pm

reippuert View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Red anodized Titanium?

in Road

verbs4us

13

1326

Thu Nov 26, 2015 6:30 pm

verbs4us View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Titanium 7900 sti bar clamps

in Road

bm0p700f

12

665

Mon Nov 16, 2015 4:58 pm

uraqt View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], erik$, Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], poppiholla and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited