Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Mon Jan 22, 2018 5:54 am

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 12:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:30 pm
Posts: 366
Tri bikes are also designed to be faster at higher yaws for two reasons.

1. Speeds are lower for a number of reasons, longer courses, you have to run after and you come from a swim, and the fact that athletes aren't specializing in just going fast on a bike

2. The hallmark event for tri is Kona, where even at world class pro speeds the riders are seeing high yaw. I wouldn't be surprised if this influences bike design because having a Kona winning bike is huge for marketing.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 1:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 1:38 pm
Posts: 743
Location: Greater Pittsburgh
Shrike wrote:
BMC TT (Mavic CXR) 190.5
BMC Tri (Mavic CXR) 196.8

BMC's TT frame is faster than the Tri version in this case (little bit faster again if you stick it on 808's)
The frame is identical, but the handle bars are different. The Tri version has the extended V, which gives you taller stack. The TT version has the flat aero bars. This accounts for difference.

No idea why the Canyon TT measured lower than the Tri... doesn't make sense. Was this test done with a rider or just with the bike? That makes a huge difference!

_________________
"Suddenly the thought struck me; my floor is someone elses ceiling" - Nils Ferlin


Top
   
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 1:01 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 8:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 1:54 pm
Posts: 18
First, consider that the margin of error for tours testing is unknown, and the difference between the canyon in TT and tri configuration is very small. Also, the Tri-version has more bits hanging on the front end. Although these surely blend in nicely with the head tube, the also increase frontal area somewhat. And it is not might be that the shape of headtube cluster has lower Cd without the added bits (to long aerofoils add more skin drag).


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. open mold time trial frames - 'best' options?

in Road

joejack951

11

1569

Wed Dec 20, 2017 1:08 pm

szabozed View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Time for a new bike - Eddy Merckx EMX 525 v Cannondale Supersix evo hi mod

in Road

sam1176uk

8

817

Fri Sep 22, 2017 1:44 am

zappafile123 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Help me find a bike article. Does anyone remember this bike?

in Road

alcatraz

10

1249

Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:08 am

alcatraz View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Fastest 700c clincher tire?

in Road

eyedrop

8

1421

Mon Mar 20, 2017 4:36 pm

Ltyarbro42 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 5kg bike claimed as "Worlds Lightest Bike"...

in Road

jimaizumi

11

3240

Sun Jun 25, 2017 5:40 am

SK5 View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AJS914, Bing [Bot], Jitensha, maverick_1, rcb78 and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited