Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:54 am

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 198 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 514 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 2:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:52 am
Posts: 1046
these guys have b****



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlZvFPdLulI

_________________
Current Rides:

2017 Giant TCR Advanced SL 0 DI2 9150


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:10 am
Posts: 258
No doubt. Disappointing Aeolus results. I have Aeolus 3's and love them. Can't see ever putting them through that kind of braking scenario, but still..........


Top
   
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:18 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:31 am
Posts: 397
The test is flawed in all sorts of ways, but still shows how much difference there can be in performance.

As mentioned in the test/writeup, two things stand out for me (1) why is it still an issue (albeit decreasing incidence) and (2) what the hell is the right testing/real world test anyway ?


Anyway, I'm a disc convert, so its something I don't worry about, just other potential failures :thumbup:


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
Posts: 559
I think the biggest issue is their own rim had the worst actual braking performance so less heat overall was being put into the rim. Also the resins they use may very well be more thermally conductive, but Raoul Luescher says the resins that can transfer heat better also tend to be more brittle. So maybe the Alto rims can survive >3min of brake drag at 7lbs brake force at a constant 21mph, but it's possible they're more likely to get damaged by potholes... That's for another test though.

There is correlation between what I saw happen to a pair of Knight wheels at Phil's Fondo though. In the Alto test, the Knight wheels only lasted 2 minutes...

Anyway, if the rims do perform better for heat dissipation, that's definitely a better end result than what happened to the Roval, Boyd and Knight rims. This could all be avoided by switching to disc brakes however.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:08 pm
Posts: 1009
Tubulars are stronger/more heat resistant? They're lighter usually so I thought maybe they'd be more fragile. Is it the complex shape of the clincher rim that makes them weaker?


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:37 pm
Posts: 101
More bulls**t from Alto, their arrogance astounds me. Here's a test using pads that aren't specified by the manufacturer, look how our competitors fail.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:08 pm
Posts: 1009
Though using different pads invalidates the test even more as you're removing a control.

But yes, they should really have repeated the test - one test with a control pad and the other with manufacturer's recommended pads.

Then we can learn something from the comparison.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:37 pm
Posts: 101
It makes the test completely invalid not using the recommended pad. If the rim isn't designed to be used with that pad, when it fails using that pad is irrelevant. If the a rim fails after 30's of braking with a Black Prince but lasts 45 minutes with the recommended pad would it still be a bad rim? It's just a bullsh**t made up marketing show to make their wheels look better. For all we know they could have built a rim specifically for this video just to make it look like it has a better performance than others.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:08 pm
Posts: 1009
Yes a different pad would/could delay how long it takes for the resin to heat up to that degree, but the test does have validity as it's just finding a way to heat the rim. No-one spends any real time braking for that long with that much force.

Again, we really would need both tests. As if you did it with just manufacturer's pads, then you have a less valid test protocol. You would have no way of reading any information from the test as there is no control. You can simply say 'cork pad' was best in test, and have no discernible way of making any conclusion. You couldn't even say 'x combination of pad and rim' was best, unless you cross tested every pad v every rim.

If you had to do just one test, the one with the most controls has the most validity.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:53 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Expat in Washington DC
Good review of the test on cycling tips .com


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:36 pm
Posts: 750
Here is a link to the Cycling Tips article @corky mentioned:
https://cyclingtips.com/2017/12/carbon-clincher-safety/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
It's all downhill from here, except for the uphills.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:34 pm
Posts: 520
I'm in the camp of use the recommended pads. I can see they just want to heat up the rim to get a result but using the correct pad will delay or even avoid overheating all together. But in the end another reason why i'll never buy carbon clinchers.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 4934
Shrike wrote:
Tubulars are stronger/more heat resistant? They're lighter usually so I thought maybe they'd be more fragile. Is it the complex shape of the clincher rim that makes them weaker?

Clincher tires are constantly forcing pressure against the sidewalls of the rim, like a mechanical “spreader”. If the resins soften up enough the pressure from the clincher tire can deform the rim, and voila... the carbon clincher issue becomes a problem. With tubulars, the pressure is entirely contained within the tire, the only real force on the rim is being applied against the rim bed itself, where you want it. The braking surface can still heat up mind you, and the resins can soften but you don’t have this constant force from the clincher wanting to spread apart the rim.

I agree with others that the test is pretty lame however, raising more questions of protocol than answering anything definitively.

_________________
Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
C59 Five Years Later
Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:52 am
Posts: 599
I can see the following problems right off the bat-
1) Use of pad unauthorized by rim mfg
2) prolonged heat may cause pad glazing, which reduces brake torque and energy dissipation
3) pad will have different coefficient of friction against different rims, leading to different energy dissipation

Just don't see the value in this test unless they
1) use manufacturers recommended pads
2) run them at a constant wheel torque and wheel speed to ensure they are actually producing the same stopping power. If I cover my brake track in Crisco, I can squeeze that brake as hard as I want for as long as I want, and the rim won't fail.

Of course, there's also the question of what's necessary in terms of total heat/braking capacity, work rate, and the tradeoff of heat resistance to mechanical toughness due to epoxy used.


Top
   
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:57 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:50 pm
Posts: 1129
Location: FIN
TobinHatesYou wrote:
I think the biggest issue is their own rim had the worst actual braking performance so less heat overall was being put into the rim.


That was my 1st thought.... suprisingly low temperatures and fast cooling like for such "friction" applied.

IMO they glazed own rim. no friction, no heat, no fail. But no braking ...

_________________
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
Mark Twain


I can be wrong, and have plenty of examples for that ;)


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 198 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 514 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Bikeradar Tyre Test

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

Ozrider

29

3853

Sun Mar 05, 2017 1:51 pm

kgt View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling Weekly Aero Bike Test 2. XR4 looking legit.

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

Shrike

28

2693

Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:46 pm

F45 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aero test. Trek Madone, Venge, Cervleo S5, Giant Propel & Canyon Aeroad

[ Go to page: 14 5 6 7 8 ]

in Road

User Name

105

16036

Wed Sep 20, 2017 5:38 pm

BeeSeeBee View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Fastest 700c clincher tire?

in Road

eyedrop

8

1432

Mon Mar 20, 2017 4:36 pm

Ltyarbro42 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Victoria corsa G+ un-gluing clincher

in Road

Allen254

10

958

Thu Nov 02, 2017 8:13 am

Marin View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Delorre, Google Adsense [Bot], Lewn777, vladi78 and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited