Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:36 pm

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:53 am
Posts: 806
that is a big change and it's going to take miles to get use to it... I had a change/fit that was just about the same ... too drastic for me I tried to keep the fit as best I could for about 500 miles, but I couldn't get use to the change on steep climbs out of the saddle. While I feel that I had a good fit, and I know there are "issue" with my current fit..I had to move back to original set up.

I don't think you can do a fit on a trainer... they have to be on roads and done over time.. and that means you and your riding buddies have to learn how to fit and/or buy the software. And to make it worse as your flexibility, riding skills and strength change so does your fit.

Sorry there is no easy way to get a bike fit! Just like steep climbs you have to do the work!

C


Top
   
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:38 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 1:40 am
Posts: 16
I've been working on a little side project called bikegeo for fitting issues like this.

Image

On my BMC Roadmachine 61cm with 25mm of spacers, 120mm -6 deg stem, I'm:

Code:
>>> import bmc
>>> axle_x = bmc.roadmachine[2017][61]['points']['front axle'][0]
>>> bars_x = cockpit(bmc.roadmachine[2017][61], (120, -6, 25))['bars'][0]
>>> axle_x - bars_x
122.18659451049905


Or 122mm behind the front axle, approximately.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:44 am
Posts: 7
TobinHatesYou wrote:
evan326 wrote:
Unless I'm completely misunderstanding what to measure, I'm going from the center of my bars at the stem with a plumb, and measuring from the front axle to that. If I had a third hand or friends I'd take a photo.


I'd have to see how you're setting everything up. How are you leveling out your bike? I use two Feedback Sports bike stands for example.

Anyway, I did the math on my H1 Emonda with a shorter front-center and a longer 110mm stem...and the distance behind the stem was 105mm based on advertised geometry.

Ettore also did the math, with proof, on his bike geometry and his bar is 126mm behind the front axle (thanks to a slack head tube angle and bigger rake than normal)

So do you trust the math or do you trust your eyeballs?


He can also place the bike on a level surface and hang a string with a weight on it from the center of his bars, and measure the horizontal distance from the string to his front axle. If he wants eyeball-proof.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:05 am
Posts: 631
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
for those who think that obtuse means stupid, a sinus is a snot-producing cavity, and a tangent something you go off on to avoid answering a straight question:

- place bike on level surface, front wheel against a wall
- measure horizontal distance from front hub to wall
- measure horizontal distance from center of bars to wall
- subtract

Do the same with center of BB and tip of saddle for saddle setback (pro-tip: turn the bike around)


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:36 pm
Posts: 59
basilic wrote:
for those who think that obtuse means stupid, a sinus is a snot-producing cavity, and a tangent something you go off on to avoid answering a straight question:

- place bike on level surface, front wheel against a wall
- measure horizontal distance from front hub to wall
- measure horizontal distance from center of bars to wall
- subtract

Do the same with center of BB and tip of saddle for saddle setback (pro-tip: turn the bike around)


Now you made me feel stupid. Measured difference saddle tip / BB recently, this method would have helped me alot...


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 6:43 pm
Posts: 3314
BdaGhisallo wrote:
Indeed. Coming up with an optimum fit for a rider does not automatically lead to a well handling bicycle based on that fit. It takes a different skill set to design a well riding bike and, in my experience at least, very few "fitters" have that skill set.
:D A guy i used to ride with spent a *lot* of money on his fit for his MTB. Allegedly gained significant power and was more comfortable.

Unfortunately the bike was all but unrideable, resulting in a season of multiple falls and injuries and eventually a fused wrist.

Refused to even entertain the idea that the fitter might not have known what he was doing........

Now only rides to the shops/green trails with his kids.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 11:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 6:43 pm
Posts: 3314
basilic wrote:
for those who think that obtuse means stupid, a sinus is a snot-producing cavity, and a tangent something you go off on to avoid answering a straight question:

- place bike on level surface, front wheel against a wall
- measure horizontal distance from front hub to wall
- measure horizontal distance from center of bars to wall
- subtract

Do the same with center of BB and tip of saddle for saddle setback (pro-tip: turn the bike around)
This was in a cycling magazine in the 80's (before fitting was the massive industry it is now)

Think it was an article about how to copy set up from one bike to the next.

It's how i still do it today.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 12:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:05 am
Posts: 631
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
niklasp wrote:
basilic wrote:
snip


Now you made me feel stupid. Measured difference saddle tip / BB recently, this method would have helped me alot...


That's also how I felt when I read about this method (in a post by the framebuilder Dave Kirk iirc). As mattr says, probably ancient wisdom.
Works well for reach and stack, too.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:45 pm
Posts: 40
All you guys with fancy cad software.

I did it with an excel spreadsheet. I basically just subtracted the reach + stem horizontal extension from the horizontal front-center measurement.

One thing I thought was interesting was that when I calculated the front center for a few different bikes, it didn't always match the F-C on the geometry charts, and I think its because certain companies measure the chainstay length as a horizontal, while others measure it as BB-rear drop.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:52 pm
Posts: 1529
rothwem wrote:
I just got a bike fit, and the new position is a solid 10mm back at the seat and 30mm back at the bars.



Why did you get a fit in the first place? Was there an issue?

_________________
Colnago C59


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:45 pm
Posts: 40
AJS914 wrote:
Why did you get a fit in the first place? Was there an issue?


Yea, I've been having nagging on/off knee problems over the past couple years. I mainly was interested in seeing what the fitter said about my cleat positioning, but I got on the trainer and the first thing he said was that I was way too forward and low.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:52 pm
Posts: 1529
If you trust the guy's experience, give it some time and try it out. There's no real right or wrong answer but you want to be comfortable on rides and get power to the pedals.

I've shorted up my reach in the last 5 years. I didn't really even fit my old Litespeed anymore for a number of reasons. I'm also 51 now and don't want to be as stretched out and low as I was when I was 25.

_________________
Colnago C59


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 1:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:03 am
Posts: 507
Location: Madison, WI USA
saba wrote:
I've been working on a little side project called bikegeo for fitting issues like this.

Image


This is awesome. I can't wait to play with bikegeo when I get home tonight. Well done!

To everyone else:

If you know how to code even a little bit (even just basic HTML) you'll be able to use this program. You can follow Saba's example to feed in the geometry of your bikes and compare them like this:

Image

You can do this in a spreadsheet, but it's awkward and error-prone. You can also do this in CAD, but many CAD programs are expensive, and using bikegeo would be way faster than learning CAD.

It's written in python, which is easy to follow even if you're just learning how to program. If you have any interest, check it out.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 1:40 am
Posts: 16
Well, I guess now I have to do a little documentation.

Another use is to compare frame sizes for a particular model:

Code:
with canvas():
    draw_bike(bmc.teammachine[2018][47])
    draw_bike(bmc.teammachine[2018][51])
    draw_bike(bmc.teammachine[2018][54])
    draw_bike(bmc.teammachine[2018][56])
    draw_bike(bmc.teammachine[2018][58])
    draw_bike(bmc.teammachine[2018][61])


Image

The project was born out of need to work out what size Salsa Fargo I would need, since it's geometry is so weird.


Top
   
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:23 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 4:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2016 8:51 pm
Posts: 477
Location: RVA,USA
TobinHatesYou wrote:
evan326 wrote:
Unless I'm completely misunderstanding what to measure, I'm going from the center of my bars at the stem with a plumb, and measuring from the front axle to that. If I had a third hand or friends I'd take a photo.


I'd have to see how you're setting everything up. How are you leveling out your bike? I use two Feedback Sports bike stands for example.

Anyway, I did the math on my H1 Emonda with a shorter front-center and a longer 110mm stem...and the distance behind the stem was 105mm based on advertised geometry.

Ettore also did the math, with proof, on his bike geometry and his bar is 126mm behind the front axle (thanks to a slack head tube angle and bigger rake than normal)

So do you trust the math or do you trust your eyeballs?

I hope you don't think I was trying to argue with you, especially because you're right :lol:
I didn't have the bike level like a fool. It's 120mm :beerchug:

_________________
My Strava Profile
2016 Cannondale CAAD12


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Can wheel types affect front end twitchiness?

in Road

Shrike

5

616

Mon May 08, 2017 1:13 pm

spud View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Thru axle adapter

in Road

markyboy

7

320

Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:42 pm

ms6073 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Mag 150 with Carbon Axle?

in Road

whydobearsxplod

5

457

Fri Sep 29, 2017 11:30 am

ms6073 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. BSA 68 support for 30[mm] crank axle

in Road

Shmitt

10

863

Sun May 07, 2017 1:13 pm

bikerjulio View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Rim brake thru-axle frames/bikes ?

in Road

ooo

9

607

Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:21 am

bm0p700f View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Gold Knight, Google Adsense [Bot], gospastic, romalor, russianbear, Yahoo [Bot] and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited