Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Fri Nov 24, 2017 2:09 pm

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 11:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 10:31 am
Posts: 52
This is interesting, unless anyone more technically minded than me can find a flaw with the methodology.

Most of the big players were subject to testing and only a handful are actually within the manufacturers stated accuracy. Luckily my Quark comes out ok (in the middle of the best performers), Stages have a proper rinsing though.

https://roadcyclinguk.com/how-to/fitnes ... think.html


Top
   
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 11:12 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 11:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 5:49 am
Posts: 344
Location: Seattle, WA
It's interesting. Like the article, I wouldn't be worried too much about the the accuracy in regards to "true" power output unless you are, for some reason, comparing the output between multiple separate units. Otherwise, the results are normalized to your unit and bike (a "300w" to you will mean something slightly different to someone else, but that would always be the case given that everyone has different fitness levels). Having multiple bikes equipped with PMs would be a concern though when riding to power. Only way to be for-sure is to treat the numbers separately (ie. measure each effort based off of separate FTP on both bikes/PMs).

The most alarming thing in the article is the variation with the exact same unit. Stages loses out here again, but the article admits (and shows) that many were precise while a few weren't. They tested 12 SRM, 10 PowerTap, 11 Quarq, 13 Stages, 3 Verve, 2 Power2Max, 1 Garmin, 1 Polar, 1 Rotar. Was the testing sample large enough to conclude that this behavior is systemic or they just had a few defective ones (4 out of 13 of the Stages had over 2% variance in the individual precision test)?

_________________
BMC Teammachine SLR01 (2018) | Rodriguez Rainier (2015)


Last edited by bilwit on Thu Aug 24, 2017 11:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 11:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:23 pm
Posts: 32
It seems it's the same study that was discussed here viewtopic.php?f=3&t=54198&start=3120#p1315887


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 4:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
Posts: 450
It's a pretty shitty "study" that lumps multiple versions of branded PMs as one. The sample sizes are also way too small, especially for any brands outside the top 4.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 3:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 6:25 am
Posts: 13
Who cares about 4%


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 3:53 pm
Posts: 60
fasdflkjweorinjs wrote:
Who cares about 4%


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


So long as it is always either 4% or -4% that's fine, but if the precision is off and it can vary from -4 to +4 from ride to ride, a 350w interval can go from being 334w to over 366w. That's a 32watt spread. Not at all insignificant.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2017 1:59 pm
Posts: 92
bilwit wrote:
It's interesting. Like the article, I wouldn't be worried too much about the the accuracy in regards to "true" power output unless you are, for some reason, comparing the output between multiple separate units.


Which you'll be doing when you get a new powermeter.

Accuracy matters because when you get that new powermeter, if it's different than your previous one than you're essentially starting over with all your power data. Which is hors categorie suckitude.

A big reason I won't touch a one-sided powermeter with a stick.

_________________
Cat 1


Top
   
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:39 pm 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Power Meter For Campagnolo

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 ]

in Road

lw11

46

5177

Sun Jul 23, 2017 11:34 pm

Mockenrue View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. power2max power meter

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

bikeracer99

35

3221

Thu Mar 30, 2017 6:12 am

PinaF8 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Power meter lifespan

in Road

stormur

7

940

Sun Aug 20, 2017 2:55 pm

RyanH View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. power meter Q again, compatibility

in Road

Boshk

6

566

Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:31 pm

pdlpsher1 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Shimano Power Meter

in Road

cunn1n9

1

527

Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:48 pm

cycleboyco View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AZR3, Bing [Bot], Broady, Littlemad and 44 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited