Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Fri Nov 24, 2017 7:15 am

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 12:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 12:37 am
Posts: 24
Long time lurker, first time poster...

I know people hate this type of thread, but I'm looking at getting a new bike and can't decide between the following: Cervelo R5, Canyon Ultimate CF SLX 9.0 or new Look 785 RS. I'm leaning towards the Look as I think the geometry would suit me the best in the Large; I tend to be right between the 56/58 Cervelo and M/L Canyon. The stack and reach of the Large Look seems to be just right.

The only one I would be able to test ride would be the Cervelo...maybe the Look once it hits bike shops, but that's a big maybe since there's only one shop that carries Look where I live and they are tiny.

Weight is not my primary concern, ride quality is. I would probably sell the stock wheels that come with the bike and use my current Enve 4.5s.

Currently riding a Look 586, which is 10 years old. Any and all advice, musings, thoughts are appreciated.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 5:53 am 
Online

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2017 11:12 am
Posts: 179
Location: Christchurch New Zealand
Lookryder wrote:

I know people hate this type of thread, but I'm looking at getting a new bike and can't decide between the following: Cervelo R5, Canyon Ultimate CF SLX 9.0 or new Look 785 RS. I'm leaning towards the Look as I think the geometry would suit me the best in the Large; I tend to be right between the 56/58 Cervelo and M/L Canyon. The stack and reach of the Large Look seems to be just right.


Why have you limited your choice to these three bikes?


Top
   
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 5:53 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 6:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:19 am
Posts: 390
I hate to disappoint some people but Hambini on youtube has found boardman/cervelo/cannondale/specialized bottom bracket shells to be quite far from acceptable tolerances. 200 bikes were tested. They run a high risk of developing creaks.

Time and Look frames had the most impressive tolerances in the test. Hongfu/dengfu was not far behind.

/a


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 6677
Location: Athens, Greece
I am not surprised that Boardman, Cervelo, Cannondale or Specialized have a much lower manufacturing quality than Time or Look frames but honestly I did not expect to be even worst than Hongfu/Dengfu...

_________________
My 6536gr TIME Skylon
My 9733gr COLNAGO Master X-light


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 1:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:38 pm
Posts: 78
kgt wrote:
I am not surprised that Boardman, Cervelo, Cannondale or Specialized have a much lower manufacturing quality than Time or Look frames but honestly I did not expect to be even worst than Hongfu/Dengfu...
I have a R series frame with press fit with no issues at all...very quiet. Although, my son had a S5 for some time that we never got to stop creaking. He has replaced that with a Look, and it's quiet as well.

Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 2:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 12:37 am
Posts: 24
Squashednuts wrote:
Lookryder wrote:

I know people hate this type of thread, but I'm looking at getting a new bike and can't decide between the following: Cervelo R5, Canyon Ultimate CF SLX 9.0 or new Look 785 RS. I'm leaning towards the Look as I think the geometry would suit me the best in the Large; I tend to be right between the 56/58 Cervelo and M/L Canyon. The stack and reach of the Large Look seems to be just right.


Why have you limited your choice to these three bikes?


Hmmm, good question. I guess those were the three that I appealed to me, but I'm open to suggestions. I've been a fan of Look ever since I got my 586, and the size and geometry of the 785 seems just right. The canyon is a stunning value, but I would need to exchange the stock bar/stem for a shorter length. The Cervelo seems like a great bike in general.

I am worried a bit about press fit BB. My threaded BB has been hastle free.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 2:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:38 pm
Posts: 78
Lookryder wrote:
Squashednuts wrote:
Lookryder wrote:

I know people hate this type of thread, but I'm looking at getting a new bike and can't decide between the following: Cervelo R5, Canyon Ultimate CF SLX 9.0 or new Look 785 RS. I'm leaning towards the Look as I think the geometry would suit me the best in the Large; I tend to be right between the 56/58 Cervelo and M/L Canyon. The stack and reach of the Large Look seems to be just right.


Why have you limited your choice to these three bikes?


Hmmm, good question. I guess those were the three that I appealed to me, but I'm open to suggestions. I've been a fan of Look ever since I got my 586, and the size and geometry of the 785 seems just right. The canyon is a stunning value, but I would need to exchange the stock bar/stem for a shorter length. The Cervelo seems like a great bike in general.

I am worried a bit about press fit BB. My threaded BB has been hastle free.
Although I prefer a traditional threaded BB. I think the press fit options are generally good if installed correctly.

Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 3:15 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:10 am
Posts: 188
ntb1001 wrote:
Lookryder wrote:
Squashednuts wrote:
Lookryder wrote:

I know people hate this type of thread, but I'm looking at getting a new bike and can't decide between the following: Cervelo R5, Canyon Ultimate CF SLX 9.0 or new Look 785 RS. I'm leaning towards the Look as I think the geometry would suit me the best in the Large; I tend to be right between the 56/58 Cervelo and M/L Canyon. The stack and reach of the Large Look seems to be just right.


Why have you limited your choice to these three bikes?


Hmmm, good question. I guess those were the three that I appealed to me, but I'm open to suggestions. I've been a fan of Look ever since I got my 586, and the size and geometry of the 785 seems just right. The canyon is a stunning value, but I would need to exchange the stock bar/stem for a shorter length. The Cervelo seems like a great bike in general.

I am worried a bit about press fit BB. My threaded BB has been hastle free.
Although I prefer a traditional threaded BB. I think the press fit options are generally good if installed correctly.

Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk
-this-..........there is so much unwarranted worry and discussion about the fear of press fit. I have three press fit bikes.....two aluminum, one carbon. While the cheap, delrin bottom brackets from Sram and others can develop noise, all three of mine are equipped with Chris King PF bottom brackets. All three are and have been completely silent. The key is a well engineered bottom bracket with very tight tolerances. They should be true interference fit and not easy to press in. No chance of movement at all. King bottom brackets in general are of the highest quality. The ability to regrease them at will with the injector tool ensures that they will indeed last a lifetime. Not inexpensive, but totally trouble free.

edit to add.......everyone will comment "it's not the bottom bracket! it's the carbon shells that are out of tolerance"! The King stuff is just slightly oversized with chamfered lips to allow easy initial entry. As it gets pressed in the oversized diameter fills up any imperfections in the shell. As I said.......effort required to press in.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 12:37 am
Posts: 24
Thanks for all the replies! This eases my fears about press fit BB.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:59 am
Posts: 1003
Location: Surrey UK
All this creaking business we all can put behind and move on.
Aluminium threaded together inserts sort the issue out.

_________________
Cervelo S5
Cervelo R5 VWD 5637g/12.43lb
Pronghorn XC SW Race 8284g/18.26lb


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2016 1:13 pm
Posts: 24
1415chris wrote:
All this creaking business we all can put behind and move on.
Aluminium threaded together inserts sort the issue out.


You're right... and i think its standard on some 2018 Cervelo model.


Top
   
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:50 pm 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Size advice Cervélo R5 (not the new one)

in Road

machadok1

13

966

Thu Jul 13, 2017 2:02 pm

machadok1 View the latest post

This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. Canyon carbon bike

in Road

RussellS

1

569

Tue Feb 07, 2017 8:14 pm

Westbank View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. anyone own a CANYON BIKE in a non-shipping country?

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

g32ecs

38

3302

Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:10 pm

BRM View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Need advice on a good bike cam

in Road

TonyM

7

779

Tue May 16, 2017 6:17 am

TonyM View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Canyon stems

in Road

vinuneuro

4

1088

Wed Mar 08, 2017 8:51 am

shotgun View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], lovemyway, sinda67 and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited