Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Sun Dec 17, 2017 11:02 pm

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 6:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 3:04 pm
Posts: 340
wwnick wrote:
madone is named after a mountain climb (which we all probably know already), funny that, for an aero bike.
new stem is ugly, imho, maybe you could get a good price on 2017 as it could be on sale.

as far asthtetics, madone=bling, emonda=elegance.


Yeah but Emonda is just an anagram of Madone, so they're both named after the same climb, not funny at all.


Top
   
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 6:13 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:11 pm
Posts: 1195
moonoi wrote:
wwnick wrote:
madone is named after a mountain climb (which we all probably know already), funny that, for an aero bike.
new stem is ugly, imho, maybe you could get a good price on 2017 as it could be on sale.

as far asthtetics, madone=bling, emonda=elegance.


Yeah but Emonda is just an anagram of Madone, so they're both named after the same climb, not funny at all.


as well as Domane...


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:14 am
Posts: 1340
Location: by Crystal Springs (Sawyer Creek Trail)
kgt wrote:
+1
Emonda is obviously the "pure race machine". The 19 watts advantage calculations are only good for Trek's marketing department, not the racing team.


Just out of curiousity, have you ever ridden an aero bike and tracked power?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2015 9:47 pm
Posts: 149
justkeepedaling wrote:
kgt wrote:
+1
Emonda is obviously the "pure race machine". The 19 watts advantage calculations are only good for Trek's marketing department, not the racing team.


Just out of curiousity, have you ever ridden an aero bike and tracked power?

Please don't...


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 12:25 am
Posts: 21
Lieblingsleguan wrote:
justkeepedaling wrote:
kgt wrote:
+1
Emonda is obviously the "pure race machine". The 19 watts advantage calculations are only good for Trek's marketing department, not the racing team.


Just out of curiousity, have you ever ridden an aero bike and tracked power?

Please don't...


Why do you say that? I'm actualy curious now about this topic


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:02 am
Posts: 3762
Location: On the bike
jlmcabral wrote:
Lieblingsleguan wrote:
justkeepedaling wrote:
kgt wrote:
+1
Emonda is obviously the "pure race machine". The 19 watts advantage calculations are only good for Trek's marketing department, not the racing team.


Just out of curiousity, have you ever ridden an aero bike and tracked power?

Please don't...


Why do you say that? I'm actualy curious now about this topic


You are new and don't understand kgt and his irrational hate and lack of understanding all things aero. For someone that supposedly teaches engineering at the university level to boot.

_________________
"Marginal gains are the only gains when all that's left to gain is in the margins."


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 11:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:07 pm
Posts: 1330
Location: The Lone Star State
Before the conversation gets derailed, I'll just chime in: unless you're doing really hilly climbs, I'd go for the Madone. That being said, here are the knocks:

The brakes are a bear to set up. I built my bike up, myself, and this took longer than routing the cables through the frame (thank God for the liners!)
It is heavy. Like, really heavy. Like, heavier than my previous Madone 5 (all the parts that could be transferred, were transferred over from that frame - so it is an apples-to-apples comparison).

Here are the positives:

It is incredibly comfortable. Much more so than my Madone 5. I haven't tried a full century on it, but metrics are a walk in the park.
It turns heads, and you'll get a lot of questions - if you're into that.
Once you know what you're doing, the maintenance work isn't all that hard. There is a steep learning curve, however (it took me 12 hours to set it up, initially, but changing cables, recently, took me no longer than my Madone 5 (faster, actually).

_________________
Madone 9 https://goo.gl/7UwZpV
Crockett https://goo.gl/f5PdCN
Madone 5 https://goo.gl/cMdyFo

Madone 4, Cobia. I own a lot of Treks.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 7:40 pm
Posts: 54
On the climb vs non-climbing topic, I find it really interesting that the Trek team uses the Emonda bikes on climbs when both bikes weigh in the same (at the UCI limit). One of the announcers during the TdF made that point, and I couldn't figure out WHY, unless the bike positioning is more favorable for steep climbs, marketing pressure from Trek, or both? Any insights?


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:40 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 11:41 pm
Posts: 102
Dagger9903 wrote:
On the climb vs non-climbing topic, I find it really interesting that the Trek team uses the Emonda bikes on climbs when both bikes weigh in the same (at the UCI limit). One of the announcers during the TdF made that point, and I couldn't figure out WHY, unless the bike positioning is more favorable for steep climbs, marketing pressure from Trek, or both? Any insights?


That is a very interesting point. Could it be that with team sponsors Trek can't get the Madone to 6.8kg?


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 5:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 7:40 pm
Posts: 54
I don't have any first hand knowledge, but the announcer on TV said straight out that both the Emonda and Madone bikes that Trek were using for the race, and were at the disposal of the riders, came in at the 6.8kg. The announcer then went on to say that so-so (can't remember which rider they were talking about) had chosen to use the Emonda for that particular climbing stage.

JScycle wrote:
Dagger9903 wrote:
On the climb vs non-climbing topic, I find it really interesting that the Trek team uses the Emonda bikes on climbs when both bikes weigh in the same (at the UCI limit). One of the announcers during the TdF made that point, and I couldn't figure out WHY, unless the bike positioning is more favorable for steep climbs, marketing pressure from Trek, or both? Any insights?


That is a very interesting point. Could it be that with team sponsors Trek can't get the Madone to 6.8kg?


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 5:21 am 
Online

Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
Posts: 523
Whichever broadcaster you were listening to doesn't have a clue. You almost never see the Madone at the UCI weight limit, and it's almost always in the mid to high 7.x kg range. There are other factors to consider too, like how poorly the frame deals with crosswinds on descents.

https://www.globalcyclingnetwork.com/vi ... rek-madone 7.4kg

http://www.velonews.com/2016/02/gallery ... rsl_395062 7.59kg

There's a few smaller pros' Madones that get around 7.3kg with sponsored components, but that seems to be the realistic lower bound.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 5:30 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 11:41 pm
Posts: 102
TobinHatesYou wrote:
Whichever broadcaster you were listening to doesn't have a clue. You almost never see the Madone at the UCI weight limit, and it's almost always in the mid to high 7.x kg range. There are other factors to consider too, like how poorly the frame deals with crosswinds on descents.

https://www.globalcyclingnetwork.com/vi ... rek-madone 7.4kg

http://www.velonews.com/2016/02/gallery ... rsl_395062 7.59kg

There's a few smaller pros' Madones that get around 7.3kg with sponsored components, but that seems to be the realistic lower bound.


I have seen the Madone down to 6.8kg but that was with some boutique wheels (AX lightness if I recall) and a small frame.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 5:37 am 
Online

Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
Posts: 523
JScycle wrote:
I have seen the Madone down to 6.8kg but that was with some boutique wheels (AX lightness if I recall) and a small frame.


Yeah I was speaking within the bounds of the pro peloton. A 56cm Madone module weighs about .9kg more than a 56cm Emonda frameset plus brakes. We know an Emonda can get down to 4.5kg with some exotic parts, so a Madone can get to 5.4kg...


Last edited by TobinHatesYou on Mon Jul 31, 2017 8:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 5:45 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 11:41 pm
Posts: 102
TobinHatesYou wrote:
JScycle wrote:
I have seen the Madone down to 6.8kg but that was with some boutique wheels (AX lightness if I recall) and a small frame.


Yeah I was speaking within the bounds of the pro peloton. A 56cm Madone module weighs about .9kg more than a 56cm Emonda frameset plus brakes. We know an Emonda can get down to 4.5kg with some exotic parts, so a Madone can get to 5.6kg...


Yeh I totally understand you.
Does that Madone module include the handlebar and stem? If it does wouldn't the difference be closer to around 400-500g due to the weight of the bars and stem on the Emonda


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 7:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 6:09 pm
Posts: 1110
Location: Loveland, CO
I have an aero bike now and I won't go back to a climbing bike anymore. The weight penalty is roughly 400 grams. Also keep in mind that what goes up must also come down.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
   
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 7:16 am 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Trek Émonda 2018

[ Go to page: 111 12 13 14 15 ]

in Road

hlvd

211

34351

Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:11 pm

ddsg View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Low stack top cap for Trek Emonda

in Road

Geordiepaul

9

860

Tue Dec 05, 2017 5:44 pm

FIJIGabe View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2018 Trek EMONDA SLR?

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

Windstopper

21

3856

Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:05 pm

oldnslow2 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Trek Emonda SLR 2018 Rim Brake Build

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 ]

in Road

ClydesdaleChris

50

3775

Fri Dec 01, 2017 6:51 pm

morganb View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Any thoughts on the 2018 Trek emonda SLR rim brake version?

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 5 ]

in Road

Windstopper

61

5173

Fri Nov 17, 2017 5:11 am

ClydesdaleChris View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alorast, Baidu [Spider], crn, JScycle, mike001100, Monkeyfudger, reknop, TobinHatesYou, uraz and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited