Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!
Moderator: robbosmans
-
deek
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 6:32 pm
by deek on Thu Mar 30, 2017 6:57 pm
Juanmoretime wrote:Without doing any research myself I'm surprised the new Red does not have a removable spider. I have 2017 Force on my tt bike and it has a removable spider. Bought new and not O.E.M.
nickf wrote:Just got these last week. BB386 spindle, it's just BB30 with a longer spindle. Definitely heavier then exogram but its power ready which is nice. Putting extralite rings on to make up for the weight penalty.
If you aren't planning on using a powermeter, the integrated spider cranks are significantly lighter. And not that much more expensive to my knowledge.
-
jeffy
- Posts: 1325
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 11:51 pm
by jeffy on Thu Mar 30, 2017 7:05 pm
nickf wrote:Just got these last week. BB386 spindle, it's just BB30 with a longer spindle. Definitely heavier then exogram but its power ready which is nice. Putting extralite rings on to make up for the weight penalty.
depends how much the removed spider weighs but ....
would be interested how it stacks up with Force....
ball park numbers/estimates
470+130 (power spider)+160(rings bolts) is not far off what i think a P2M Force would weigh (i think).
for reference Rotor 3D24+P2M+Praxis (compact) = ~800g
-
ergott
- Posts: 2870
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:03 am
- Location: Islip, NY
-
Contact:
by ergott on Thu Mar 30, 2017 9:20 pm
My Red DZero was only 10-15g lighter (forget what spacers I had on when I weighted them.
This one is BB30 130BCD 170mm ams. I thought they would have been significantly lighter.
-
nickf
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:34 pm
by nickf on Thu Mar 30, 2017 9:23 pm
I'm going with a standard threaded BB. This BB386 with a longer spindle will allow me to run it in a 68mm shell with threaded BB386 cups. I'm more then likely gong to get power sooner then later.
-
nickf
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:34 pm
by nickf on Thu Mar 30, 2017 9:38 pm
This BB386 setup with extralite rings Is going to be around 60g heavier. That's comparing it against a standard gxp exogram with the same rings.
-
marcelfacd
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 6:53 pm
by marcelfacd on Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:15 am
nickf wrote:Just got these last week. BB386 spindle, it's just BB30 with a longer spindle. Definitely heavier then exogram but its power ready which is nice. Putting extralite rings on to make up for the weight penalty.
Hi,
Where dit you got these, been searching for them but they all seem to be out of stock and no one knows if they will come again ;-(.... BB386 is not even mentioned on the SRAM site !
-
sp3000
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 7:12 am
- Location: Sydney
by sp3000 on Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:02 pm
I made the mistake of getting the BB30 Sram red cranks before I got my Dzero with the 386, the whole ordering thing got quite confused and they offered me a return no worries, but after expensive postage back to Germany from Australia I decided to keep the chainrings and sell the cranks. So I'm now left with a brand new in the box set of 172.5mm 130BCD BB30 Sram red with etap graphics integrated cranks. I'll use the chainrings for the Dzero when it arrives, but if anyone want the cranks I'd be happy to do a sweet deal on them to a good home. PM me if you need them.
-
nickf
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:34 pm
by nickf on Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:34 pm
marcelfacd wrote:nickf wrote:Just got these last week. BB386 spindle, it's just BB30 with a longer spindle. Definitely heavier then exogram but its power ready which is nice. Putting extralite rings on to make up for the weight penalty.
Hi,
Where dit you got these, been searching for them but they all seem to be out of stock and no one knows if they will come again ;-(.... BB386 is not even mentioned on the SRAM site !
I know our supplier has them in stock through the shop I'm at. Mine are 172.5 110bcd the SRAM part number is
00.6118.446.002 their description says its exogram but it is in fact not.
-
topflightpro
- Posts: 829
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:35 am
by topflightpro on Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:46 pm
nickf wrote:I know our supplier has them in stock through the shop I'm at. Mine are 172.5 110bcd the SRAM part number is
00.6118.446.002 their description says its exogram but it is in fact not.
Yep, they are not Exogram. You can tell by looking at the NDS arm - it has that little metal lip between the arm and the spindle. The Exogram cranks do not have that. (See the picture Deek posted of the 371g set of Red 22 BB30 cranks.)
-
deek
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 6:32 pm
by deek on Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:44 pm
topflightpro wrote:nickf wrote:I know our supplier has them in stock through the shop I'm at. Mine are 172.5 110bcd the SRAM part number is
00.6118.446.002 their description says its exogram but it is in fact not.
Yep, they are not Exogram. You can tell by looking at the NDS arm - it has that little metal lip between the arm and the spindle. The Exogram cranks do not have that. (See the picture Deek posted of the 371g set of Red 22 BB30 cranks.)
Exogram just means hollow carbon. All of the Red branded cranks are hollow but the design of the removable spider ones is much heavier.
-
mattinnc
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 6:19 pm
by mattinnc on Fri Apr 07, 2017 2:22 pm
I ended up getting a Red 10sp crankset, non-Exogram. Here are the weights, with and without the chainrings.
I'll keep looking to see if I can find an Exogram at the right price, save the weight!