Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Sat Nov 18, 2017 7:56 am

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

Quarq v Stages
Quarq Dzero SRAM 91%  91%  [ 67 ]
SRAM Red with Stages 9%  9%  [ 7 ]
Total votes: 74
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 4:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:08 pm
Posts: 924
leicaman wrote:
Perhaps a stupid question but am I right in saying that the the Quarq SRAM red Dzero is compatible with etap? I have etap and don't want any nasty surprises when the power meter arrives.

Cheers


Yes but you have to buy the power meter etched onto the crank. You can't buy the power meter spider and install it yourself on a SRAM Red eTap Graphics crankset.

This will work:
https://www.quarq.com/store/item/1770/

Theres also an aluminium arm version, and a Quarq carbon version (same as Sram but Quarq logo instead). Both will also work.


Top
   
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 4:49 am 
  • SRAM Quarq DZero Carbon BB30 30mm hidden bolt BCD 110mm 170mm
  • 770.9 EUR
  • Price includes 19% V.A.T. which will be deducted when goods are leaving the EU. Shipping costs may be added.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 4:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:08 pm
Posts: 924
sd5500 wrote:
Shrike wrote:
@Troy

are you not making 165mm SRAM eTap Dzero's?

Asked Wiggle and they said no, they won't be stocking any.

Is there anywhere that has a 165mm SRAM eTap Dzero GXP in stock if you are making them?


I just ordered that exact one (its 130 for my 53/39 rings) last night from clevertraining.com


Yeah some 130s around, but 110's aren't anywhere.
http://www.clevertraining.com/quarq-sra ... ower-meter

'Special order'


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:27 pm
Posts: 579
Delorre wrote:
For me, Stages V2 have been performing really well for most than a year now: consitant, reliable, light and reasonably affordable. It's maybe not 100% accurate, but if consitant, that's OK to track own progress and do workouts based on power. I own a Drivo since last week, and seems Stages reads low on power, but being left side only, its possible my left - right balance is not 50 - 50 %, so nothing I can fault Stages for :wink:


The consistent but not accurate argument again, eh? no, it does matter.

Say your real L/R balance is 55/45. For simplicity sake, lets assume an FTP of 100 Watts, 55W left, 45 watts right Stages assumes 50/50, so it would read 55 watts left foot and multiply it by two- telling you your FTP is 110 W. Stages will OVER estimate your power by 10%. If you are using power to design your workouts- you'd be 10% over your required power all the time. would your intervals be effective then? Worse, if you're riding a time trial and pacing using power- you'd be going out 10% too hard, a recipe for disaster.

Now say you were 45/55 L/R balance. Assuming an FTP of 100Watts again, Stages now UNDER estimates your power at 90 watts. again, all your workouts would then be 10% below what you'd really need to hit, you'd be too conservative for your pacing. Considering stages is +/- 2% accurate you could be looking at as much of a 12% error.

granted, if your L/R balance is lower- say 42/58, you'd get less error, but your L/R can drift when you are fatigued, and it's been pretty much shown that MOST folks are not 50/50. Stages is also highly inaccurate for Short sprint intervals. if you ride track, A stages is not going to give you good data.

For most people, a stages may be 'good enough', but unless you know your true L/R balance you won't really ever know. If you're already spending $700 odd on a stages, why spend so much money on an imperfect product?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 1165
dataplz


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 27
davidalone wrote:
The consistent but not accurate argument again, eh? no, it does matter.

Say your real L/R balance is 55/45. For simplicity sake, lets assume an FTP of 100 Watts, 55W left, 45 watts right Stages assumes 50/50, so it would read 55 watts left foot and multiply it by two- telling you your FTP is 110 W. Stages will OVER estimate your power by 10%. If you are using power to design your workouts- you'd be 10% over your required power all the time. would your intervals be effective then? Worse, if you're riding a time trial and pacing using power- you'd be going out 10% too hard, a recipe for disaster.

Now say you were 45/55 L/R balance. Assuming an FTP of 100Watts again, Stages now UNDER estimates your power at 90 watts. again, all your workouts would then be 10% below what you'd really need to hit, you'd be too conservative for your pacing. Considering stages is +/- 2% accurate you could be looking at as much of a 12% error.


This is not true if you use the same Stages PM to perform the workouts; you will be in the right powerzones although inaccurately measured. Of course, swapping to another (L/R) PM there will be a substantial discrepancy. But then again measurements will differ between any PM (although hopefully not by 10%).


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:40 pm
Posts: 30
Excuse my weak legs. But here's 2 rides. First one with Stages Duraace version 2. Second with Quarq DZero. Exact same route except where I hit start and stop is off by a few seconds. Elevation discrepancy is cause of my Garmin. You be the judge!

Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 27
So many other variables (bike/wind/position/temperature/...) that you can't draw any conclusion from the data.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:08 pm
Posts: 924
You can conclude that no significant discrepancy is currently apparent.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 3:04 pm
Posts: 338
Average power is a useless measurement to determine the accuracy of a power meter


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:40 pm
Posts: 30
Clearly the only we can really be sure of the accuracy is testing it in a lab situation. has this been done before? it there a power meter accuracy test out there? All I've seen is comparing one PM vs another in those youtube tests.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 10:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 3:04 pm
Posts: 338
Take a look at how Ray Maker does his PM testing, there is probably no more accurate testing methodology in a real world environment than what he does.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2017 5:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:27 pm
Posts: 579
raven14 wrote:

This is not true if you use the same Stages PM to perform the workouts; you will be in the right powerzones although inaccurately measured. Of course, swapping to another (L/R) PM there will be a substantial discrepancy. But then again measurements will differ between any PM (although hopefully not by 10%).[/quote]

That assumes your L/R remains the same on a day to day basis, with fatigue, and at different levels of intensity. The moment you swap power meter, you're also screwed. your previous data becomes pointless.

THe point is, you're already spending already circa 700 dollars on a stages. why not pay 100-150 more for a power2max, or a powertap?


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2017 8:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 1165
Show me real data that lr balance changes on a day to day basis otherwise I will continue to consider this a strawman argument.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 2:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 3:04 pm
Posts: 338
Well I got bored waiting for my repaired/replacement Quarq and bought a Stages, so far I'm very happy with it and the data correlates well with my Rotor Inpower in similar conditions


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 8:54 am
Posts: 204
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Is there a big difference in color (carbon structure) between Sram eTap cranck and Stages cranck?

Is it possible to remove Stages logo from Stages cranck?


Top
   
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 3:13 pm 
  • SRAM Quarq DZero Carbon BB30 30mm hidden bolt BCD 110mm 170mm
  • 770.9 EUR
  • Price includes 19% V.A.T. which will be deducted when goods are leaving the EU. Shipping costs may be added.


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Lil help w/ old SRAM (Red?) power meter?

in Road

Kidtreo

4

360

Fri Aug 18, 2017 4:34 pm

sungod View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Power meter for 2016 Sram red 22

in Road

Monkeychunki

5

547

Mon May 22, 2017 8:23 pm

ergott View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Stages Carbon Power Meter

in Road

JoeFlan

11

1838

Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:30 am

shotgun View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Stages Power Meter Questions...

in Road

wboyle3

13

913

Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:38 pm

GothicCastle View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Stages power meter and Cannondale

in Road

Thenuge

3

434

Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:06 pm

morrisond View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Gold Knight, Google [Bot], GothicCastle and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited